Integrated Family Centres: Directions for Future Developments

Two major types of family centre can be identified. The first type aims to support families in the community by offering a range of practical services to alleviate stress. The second type of centre focuses on assessment and therapeutic intervention in families where children are at risk of abuse. In practice, many centres fulfil both functions and can be termed \u27integrated centres\u27. This paper reports on an evaluation of an integrated centre. The evaluation was conducted on three levels: the managerial level, the level of professionals who work in the centre, and on the level of the families who use the centre. Findings show a contradiction between the two different kinds of services provided by the centre. The contradiction results in the professionals experiencing tension in their role and the families expressing ambivalent feelings about the approach taken to them. The authors outline ways to resolve the tension by suggesting an alternative role for integrated centres

Kindesschutzsysteme: Ein internationaler Vergleich der “Good Practice” aus fünf Ländern (Australien, Deutschland, Finnland, Schweden und Vereinigtes Königreich) mit Schlussfolgerungen für die Schweiz.

Ein internationaler Vergleich der “Good Practice” aus fünf Ländern (Australien, Deutschland, Finnland, Schweden und Vereinigtes Königreich) mit Schlussfolgerungen für die Schweiz

Child Protection in Europe: Development of an International Cross-Comparison Model to Inform National Policies and Practices

We report a five-nations project in comparative child protection to provide recommendations on policy and practice to inform the redevelopment of the Swiss child protection system. The Swiss Federal Government and the Optimus and Oak Foundations commissioned the project—collective title: Association Programme National pour la Protection de l'Enfant. We identify the historical developmental trajectories of child protection systems together with common drivers: the evidential basis for the prevalence and effects of child abuse, the co-joining of social and economic policies and practices to promote early investment in children, the influence of children's rights and comparative international league tables on child well-being. We describe the cross-national project methodology and analysis of results. Three key indicators for the performance of national child protection systems are indicated: creating a culturally sensitive child protection governance framework, building a relational heart and using evidence to inform policy and practice. These encapsulate the recommendations made with respect to the Swiss child protection system. The results provide a prototype model with potential utility in similar cross-national studies, and add weight to the argument that cross-cultural learning in the context of a globalised society is not only possible, but desirabl