Infection Control and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination in Nursing Homes

Adults over the age of 65 are at increased risk for influenza and pneumococcal infections; particularly those residing in nursing homes (NHs). Despite the efficacy of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, vaccination receipt rates among NH residents remain well below federal recommendations and racial/ethnic disparities exist. Minority NH residents (non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics) are less likely to be offered either vaccination and are more likely to refuse them compared to their non-minority counterparts (non-Hispanic Whites). In the past decade, requirements have been implemented to increase vaccination coverage in NHs, but there is little documentation regarding current racial/ethnic disparities in vaccination receipt. Furthermore, activities important to resident care delivery and the prevention of care deficiencies such as infections are primarily dependent on the care provided by certified nursing assistants (CNAs). For these reasons, current research examining racial/ethnic disparities in vaccination receipt in NHs is needed and more attention directed towards CNAs is necessary to improve resident care delivery and outcomes related to infection prevention and control. This dissertation furthers our understanding of racial/ethnic disparities in influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage among minority NH residents and the role racial/ethnic diverse CNAs play in infection prevention and control. Chapter One introduces the problem of health disparities in nursing homes (NHs) related to differences in preventative vaccination receipt by racial/ethnic status and the role CNAs play in infection prevention and control. Chapter Two, an integrative literature review on racial/ethnic disparities in NHs, describes racial/ethnic disparities occurring in the NH setting in the context of infection prevention and control and influenza and pneumococcal vaccination receipt along with contributing factors and existing strategies related to policy that have been implemented to address poor care quality. In Chapter Three, facility-level factors related to the CNA’s role and the barriers and facilitators they experience that contribute to infection prevention and control are discussed. In Chapter Four, a systematic review of previous research on racial/ethnic disparities related to influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in NHs, individual, community, and facility-level factors that determine these disparities in influenza and pneumococcal vaccination receipt, along with associated strategies and practices are discussed. In Chapter Five, a national quantitative analysis of vaccination receipt practices (vaccination administered) and reasons for vaccination non-receipt (i.e., not offered versus refused) are presented. The results of this dissertation will inform clinicians and NH administrators as well as future policy and public health interventions and provide evidence needed to improve racial/ethnic minority health and eliminate health disparities

Perceived barriers to infection prevention and control for nursing home certified nursing assistants: a qualitative study.

Healthcare-associated infections, while preventable, result in increased morbidity and mortality in nursing home (NH) residents. Frontline personnel, such as certified nursing assistants (CNAs), are crucial to successful implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers to implementing and maintaining IPC practices for NH CNAs as well as to describe strategies used to overcome these barriers. We conducted a multi-site qualitative study of NH personnel important to infection control. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and transcripts were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Five key themes emerged as perceived barriers to effective IPC for CNAs: 1) language/culture; 2) knowledge/training; 3) per-diem/part-time staff; 4) workload; and 5) accountability. Strategies used to overcome these barriers included: translating in-services, hands on training, on-the-spot training for per-diem/part-time staff, increased staffing ratios, and inclusion/empowerment of CNAs. Understanding IPC barriers and strategies to overcome these barriers may better enable NHs to achieve infection reduction goals

Understanding infection prevention and control in nursing homes: A qualitative study.

Infections have been identified as a priority issue in nursing homes (NHs). We conducted a qualitative study purposively sampling 10 NHs across the country where 6-8 employees were recruited (N = 73). Semi-structured, open-ended guides were used to conduct in-depth interviews. Data were audiotaped, transcribed and a content analysis was performed. Five themes emerged: \u27Residents\u27 Needs\u27, \u27Roles and Training\u27 \u27Using Infection Data,\u27 \u27External Resources\u27 and \u27Focus on Hand Hygiene.\u27 Infection prevention was a priority in the NHs visited. While all sites had hand hygiene programs, other recommended areas were not a focus and many sites were not aware of available resources. Developing ways to ensure effective, efficient and standardized infection prevention and control in NHs continues to be a national priority

Bike Share Program in Worcester

https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/gps-posters/1240/thumbnail.jp

The influence of empowered work environments on the psychological experiences of nursing assistants during COVID-19: a qualitative study" with "Fertility, Human"

Background Nursing Assistants (NA) who feel empowered tend to perform their duties better, have higher morale and job satisfaction, and are less likely to leave their jobs. Organizational empowerment practices in hospitals likely shape the psychological experiences of empowerment among these personnel; however, little is known about this relationship. Objective We used qualitative inquiry to explore the relationship between organizational empowerment structural components and feelings of psychological empowerment among hospital frontline workers during a public health emergency. Methods Kanter’s Theory of Structural Empowerment and Spreitzer’s Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace Framework were applied to identify the conceptual influences of organizational practices on psychological experiences of empowerment. In-depth interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of NAs, caring for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Directed content analysis was performed to generate a data matrix consisting of the psychological experiences of meaning, competence, self-determination, and impact embedded under the organizational structural components of information, resources, support, and opportunity. Results Thirteen NAs (mean age = 42 years, 92% female) completed interviews. Information, or lack thereof, provided to the NAs influenced feelings of fear, preparation, and autonomy. Resources (e.g., protocols, equipment, and person-power) made it easier to cope with overwhelming emotions, affected the NAs’ abilities to do their jobs, and when limited, drove NAs to take on new roles. NAs noted that support was mostly provided by nurses and made the NAs feel appreciated, desiring to contribute more. While NAs felt they could consult leadership when needed, several felt leadership showed little appreciation for their roles and contributions. Similar to support, the opportunity to take care of COVID-19 patients yielded a diverse array of emotions, exposed advances and gaps in NA preparation, and challenged NAs to autonomously develop new care practices and processes. Conclusion Management and empowerment of healthcare workers are critical to hospital performance and success. We found many ways in which the NAs’ psychological experiences of empowerment were shaped by the healthcare system’s empowerment-related structural conditions during a public health emergency. To further develop an empowered and committed critical workforce, hospitals must acknowledge the organizational practice influence on the psychological experiences of empowerment among NAs

The Great American Recession and forgone healthcare: Do widened disparities between African-Americans and Whites remain?

During the Great Recession in America, African-Americans opted to forgo healthcare more than other racial/ethnic groups. It is not understood whether disparities in forgone care returned to pre-recession levels. Understanding healthcare utilization patterns is important for informing subsequent efforts to decrease healthcare disparities. Therefore, we examined changes in racial disparities in forgone care before, during, and after the Great Recession.Data were pooled from the 2006-2013 National Health Interview Survey. Forgone medical, mental, and prescription care due to affordability were assessed among African-Americans and Whites. Time periods were classified as: pre-recession (May 2006-November 2007), early recession (December 2007-November 2008), late recession (December 2008-May 2010) and post-recession (June 2010-December 2013). Multivariable logistic regressions of race, interacted with time periods, were used to identify disparities in forgone care controlling for other demographics, health insurance coverage, and having a usual place for medical care across time periods. Adjusted Wald tests were performed to identify significant changes in disparities across time periods.The sample consisted of 110,746 adults. African-Americans were more likely to forgo medical care during the post- recession compared to Whites (OR = 1.16, CI = 1.06, 1.26); changes in foregone medical care disparities were significant in that they increased in the post-recession period compared to the pre-recession (OR = 1.17, CI = 1.08, 1.28 and OR = 0.89, CI = 0.77, 1.04, respectively, adjusted Wald Test p-value < 0.01). No changes in disparities were seen in prescription and mental forgone care.A persistent increase in forgone medical care disparities existed among African-Americans compared to Whites post-Great Recession and may be a result of outstanding issues related to healthcare access, cost, and quality. While health insurance is an important component of access to care, it alone should not be expected to remove these disparities due to other financial constraints. Additional strategies are necessary to close remaining gaps in care widened by the Great Recession