Groshong or implanted catheter infections in ambulatory haematological patients

Summary: Incidence rates of bacteraemia and catheter-related infections were measured prospectively amongst haematological patients having long-term catheters and hospitalised in the ambulatory care unit between November 2005 and October 2006. The following risk factors were collected: age, sex, catheter type, follow-up duration, level of personal hygiene, pathology, number of lines of treatment, autograft and erythropoietin treatment.340 patients were included, having 353 catheters (100 of the Groshong-type, followed during 17,621 days, and 253 of the type with implantable ports, followed during 51,049 days). 0.13 catheter-related infections and 0.07 bacteraemia per 100 catheter days were observed with the Groshong-type catheter, whereas 0.05 (P < 10−5) catheter-related infections and 0.05 (P = 0.048) bacteraemia were observed amongst patients with implantable ports. A multivariate analysis (Cox method taking into account the length of follow-up) on risk factors highlighted a significant effect of the type of catheter on catheter-related infections (Groshong versus implantable port OR = 5.74, P < 10−3), and of several factors on bacteraemia (lymphoma versus other pathologies OR = 3.19, P = 0.041; erythropoietin treatment OR = 2.88, P = 0.009; autograft OR = 3.35, P = 0.011; number of lines of treatment OR = 0.68, P = 0.047). It was not possible to determine if poor levels of personal hygiene had a significant impact, due to large numbers of missing data. These results, consistent with other studies, are not only useful in validating prevention policy but also in demonstrating lack of catheter traceability. Keywords: Catheter-related infection, Bacteraemia, Surveillance, Haematology, Ambulatory car

Retreatment with rituximab in 178 patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphomas: a single institution case control study

The role of rituximab retreatment in relapsed B-cell lymphoma is not well known. We undertook a single center retrospective cohort study to investigate the efficacy of retreatment with rituximab with or without chemotherapy in patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphomas. We only included patients treated first-line and in first progression; 178 patients were included in the study, of whom 29% had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 28% had follicular lymphoma (FL). The overall response rate for the first treatment was 81% and for the second treatment was 66%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients from diagnosis was 13.2 months and from relapse was 12.5 months (not statistically different). For DLBCL the median PFS from diagnosis was 9.6 months and from relapse was 8.4 months, and for FL the median PFS from diagnosis was 26.4 months and from relapse was 19.2 months (not statistically different). The 5-year overall survival was 57%. In a historical comparison with rituximab-naive patients, rituximab-retreated patients had a shorter time to initial relapse than control patients, but there was no difference between the two groups for PFS from relapse. In conclusion, retreatment with rituximab, with or without chemotherapy, yields a high overall response rate in patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphomas. Relapse occurring after rituximab-containing therapy appears to be more aggressive than that occurring after chemotherapy alone. The outcome of retreatment, in terms of progression-free survival, is similar to that of primary treatment