Comparing eye movements recorded by search coil and infrared eye tracking

OBJECTIVE: The performance of a new video-based infrared eye tracker (IR) was compared to the magnetic search coil technique (SC). Since the IR offers interesting possibilities as a diagnostic tool in neuro-ophthalmology, it was investigated whether the new device has overcome shortcomings that were reported from former IR systems. METHODS: Horizontal saccades were recorded using the IR and the SC. The IR allowed eye movement recordings at different sampling rates ranging from 250 Hz to 1000 Hz while the SC recorded at 1000 Hz. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the IR and the SC were in good agreement and produced similar results. In contrast to other studies, the influence of the sampling rate of the IR was small. The saccade main-sequences did not show significant differences. The latency times observed for both systems were mainly in the short-latency range

Intra-individual variability of saccadic velocity measured with the infrared reflection and magnetic scleral search coil methods.

BACKGROUND: The infrared (IR) and the magnetic scleral search coil (MSC) systems for eye tracking were studied with regard to the intra-individual variability in saccadic eye movement recordings. METHOD: Three healthy subjects performed similar saccadic eye movement tasks at five different occasions with both the IR (Orbit XY-1000) and the MSC (Skalar Medical) techniques. The maximum velocity (VMAX) and slope constant (C) of the main sequence plots were analyzed with regard to the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (Ricc). In addition, the possible reasons for variability in the IR recordings, especially different causes for noise, were analyzed and discussed. RESULTS: The main sequence data showed intra-individual variation with both recording systems, but the coefficient of variation was higher for VMAX with the IR compared to the MSC method. Ricc analysis showed that 36% of the variance of VMAX and 49% of the variance of C resulted from intra-individual variability in recordings of the IR system. The corresponding results for the MSC recordings regarding VMAX and C were 48% and 88%. CONCLUSIONS: Saccadic eye movement recordings yielded a larger intra-individual variability with the IR system than with the MSC system. The effect that the MSC annulus may have on the ocular motor command signal and the possible low pass filter caused by the coil slipping on the surface of the eye may partly explain the relatively lower velocity in the MSC recordings. Also, noise in the IR recordings induces peaks of eye velocity, which can be reduced considerably by filtering. However, the variability in the recordings, which was larger in the IR than in the MSC recordings, did not seem to be decreased by filtering. The basic level of noise in the recordings was not clearly associated with the amount of reduction of VMAX when the IR recordings were filtered. We suggest that artefacts of the saccadic signal, which can be related to changes in the reflecting surface of the eyes and eyelids, are important factors for explaining the variability and high-velocity peaks in the IR recordings. Lighting conditions was confirmed as a cause for noise, but temperature and air humidity changes in the goggles were not suspected to influence data in the normal experimental setting. Although noise, shortcomings of the recording technique and procedure may offer explanations for the intra-individual variability, the calibration procedure and changes in attention and fatigue of the subject should also be considered

Saccadic eye movement velocity measured with the infrared reflection and search coil eye-tracking systems in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.

Background Assessment of changes in saccade velocity may be useful in the early detection of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO). Two eye-tracking systems were used to measure the velocity of saccadic eye movements in patients with TAO. Method Fourteen patients with active TAO and 14 healthy controls were enrolled for recordings with two eye-tracking systems: the magnetic scleral search coil (MSC; Skalar Medical) and the infrared reflection systems (IR; Orbit XY-1000). The MSC is generally considered the "gold standard" method for tracking of rapid eye movements. The IR system uses novel computer technology and is based on sampling of reflected infrared light from the surface of the eyes. Main sequence plots constructed from the recorded saccadic peak velocity and amplitude were analyzed for differences between patients and healthy controls. Results There were no significant differences between patients with TAO and healthy controls in the constructed main sequence plots of maximum velocity (VMAX) and the slope constant (C). Conclusions Main sequence analysis of saccadic eye movements was not useful for detecting TAO in this experimental setting with either of the two eye-tracking methods. This is hypothesized to be due to compensation for the early orbital changes in TAO by neural adaptation of the saccades in the brain stem. The contradictory results between this and previous studies cannot be easily explained. We assume that there is a large heterogeneity in the saccadic eye movement performance in both the normal population and the TAO-population. Also, differences in the study design may cause dissimilar outcomes and hence incoherent conclusions. A non-invasive recording system that is able to generate a minimum amount of intra- and inter-individual variability and a study design where normal variability can be reduced to a minimum may be useful for future identification of early eye muscle changes in TAO

Management of hyperthyroidism due to Graves' disease: frequently asked questions and answers (if any)

Graves\u2019 disease is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism in iodine-replete areas. Although progress has been made in our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease, no treatment targeting pathogenic mechanisms of the disease is presently available. Therapies for Graves\u2019 hyperthyroidism are largely imperfect because they are bound to either a high rate of relapsing hyperthyroidism (antithyroid drugs) or lifelong hypothyroidism (radioiodine treatment or thyroidectomy). Aim of the present article is to offer a practical guidance to the reader by providing evidence-based answers to frequently asked questions in clinical practice