19 research outputs found

    breast screening axillary lymph node status of interval cancers by interval year

    Get PDF
    Abstract The aim of this study was to determine whether the excess risk of axillary lymph node metastases (N+) differs between interval breast cancers arising shortly after a negative mammography and those presenting later. In a registry-based series of pT1a–pT3 breast carcinoma patients aged 50–74years from the Italian screening programmes, the odds ratio (OR) for interval cancers ( n =791) versus the screen-detected (SD) cancers ( n =1211) having N+ was modelled using forward stepwise logistic regression analysis. The interscreening interval was divided into 1–12, 13–18, and 19–24months. The prevalence of N+ was 28% among SD cancers. With a prevalence of 38%, 42%, and 44%, the adjusted (demographics and N staging technique) OR of N+ for cancers diagnosed between 1–12, 13–18, and 19–24months of interval was 1.41 (95% confidence interval 1.06–1.87), 1.74 (1.31–2.31), and 1.91 (1.43–2.54), respectively. Histologic type, tumour grade, and tumour size were entered in turn into the model. Histologic type had modest effects. With adjustment for tumour grade, the ORs decreased to 1.23 (0.92–1.65), 1.58 (1.18–2.12), and 1.73 (1.29–2.32). Adjusting for tumour size decreased the ORs to 0.95 (0.70–1.29), 1.34 (0.99–1.81), and 1.37 (1.01–1.85). The strength of confounding by tumour size suggested that the excess risk of N+ for first-year interval cancers reflected only their higher chronological age, whereas the increased aggressiveness of second-year interval cancers was partly accounted for by intrinsic biological attributes

    Estimate of overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography after adjustment for lead time. A service screening study in Italy

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Excess of incidence rates is the expected consequence of service screening. The aim of this paper is to estimate the quota attributable to overdiagnosis in the breast cancer screening programmes in Northern and Central Italy. METHODS: All patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 50 and 74 years who were resident in screening areas in the six years before and five years after the start of the screening programme were included. We calculated a corrected-for-lead-time number of observed cases for each calendar year. The number of observed incident cases was reduced by the number of screen-detected cases in that year and incremented by the estimated number of screen-detected cases that would have arisen clinically in that year. RESULTS: In total we included 13,519 and 13,999 breast cancer cases diagnosed in the pre-screening and screening years, respectively. In total, the excess ratio of observed to predicted in situ and invasive cases was 36.2%. After correction for lead time the excess ratio was 4.6% (95% confidence interval 2 to 7%) and for invasive cases only it was 3.2% (95% confidence interval 1 to 6%). CONCLUSION: The remaining excess of cancers after individual correction for lead time was lower than 5%

    Breast cancer survival in the US and Europe: a CONCORD high-resolution study.

    Get PDF
    Breast cancer survival is reportedly higher in the US than in Europe. The first worldwide study (CONCORD) found wide international differences in age-standardized survival. The aim of this study is to explain these survival differences. Population-based data on stage at diagnosis, diagnostic procedures, treatment and follow-up were collected for about 20,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer aged 15-99 years during 1996-98 in 7 US states and 12 European countries. Age-standardized net survival and the excess hazard of death up to 5 years after diagnosis were estimated by jurisdiction (registry, country, European region), age and stage with flexible parametric models. Breast cancers were generally less advanced in the US than in Europe. Stage also varied less between US states than between European jurisdictions. Early, node-negative tumors were more frequent in the US (39%) than in Europe (32%), while locally advanced tumors were twice as frequent in Europe (8%), and metastatic tumors of similar frequency (5-6%). Net survival in Northern, Western and Southern Europe (81-84%) was similar to that in the US (84%), but lower in Eastern Europe (69%). For the first 3 years after diagnosis the mean excess hazard was higher in Eastern Europe than elsewhere: the difference was most marked for women aged 70-99 years, and mainly confined to women with locally advanced or metastatic tumors. Differences in breast cancer survival between Europe and the US in the late 1990s were mainly explained by lower survival in Eastern Europe, where low healthcare expenditure may have constrained the quality of treatment

    Modulation of oestrogen excretion profiles by adjuvant chemotherapy in pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer

    No full text
    Modulation of steroid status by conventional chemotherapy was studied in 31 breast cancer patients receiving CMF and in 31 age-matched breast cancer patients without any therapy, taken as controls. This was achieved through the study of oestrogen excretion profiles using previously identified parameters and referring not only to classical but also to the "other", namely catechol and unusual, oestrogen metabolites. After CMF treatment the premenopausal patients exhibit a modified excretion pattern, mainly concerning a marked and significant reduction of classical oestrogens, as shown by pattern indices. Because there is evidence that oestriol metabolism is not markedly affected by CMF treatment, such a significant decrease in classical oestrogens must be attributed to the secretory function, presumably ovarian ab origine. To the contrary, after treatment, pattern indices show significantly higher median values in postmenopausal patients. Mean oestriol ratio values also display a significant increase, thus supporting the hypothesis that conventional cytotoxic drugs may act by enhancing oestrogen metabolic rates. In fact, the postmenopausal treated subgroup proved to have significantly higher excretion levels of most of the oestrogens considered to date. Surprisingly, E1 + E1-S fractions were strongly reduced in this subgroup and this leads to the suggestion of an increased steroid metabolic rate by CMF treatment. However, comparing 9 breast cancer patients, when having had both short-term and non-short-term CMF treatment, the effects on steroid excretion patterns appear to arise at an early stage

    Regional inequalities in cancer care persist in Italy and can influence survival

    No full text
    Background Population-based cancer registry studies of care patterns can help elucidate reasons for the marked geographic variation in cancer survival across Italy. The article provides a snapshot of the care delivered to cancer patients in Italy. Methods Random samples of adult patients with skin melanoma, breast, colon and non-small cell lung cancers diagnosed in 2003–2005 were selected from 14 Italian cancer registries. Logistic models estimated odds of receiving standard care (conservative surgery plus radiotherapy for early breast cancer; surgery plus chemotherapy for Dukes C colon cancer; surgery for lung cancer; sentinel node biopsy for >1 mm melanoma, vs. other treatment) in each registry compared to the entire sample (reference). Results Stage at diagnosis for breast, colon and melanoma was earlier in north/central than southern registries. Odds of receiving standard care were lower than reference in Sassari (0.68, 95%CI 0.51–0.90) and Napoli (0.48, 95%CI 0.35–0.67) for breast cancer; did not differ across registries for Dukes C colon cancer; were higher in Romagna (3.77, 95%CI 1.67–8.50) and lower in Biella (0.38, 95%CI 0.18–0.82) for lung cancer; and were higher in Reggio Emilia (2.37, 95%CI 1.12–5.02) and lower in Ragusa (0.27, 95%CI 0.14–0.54) for melanoma. Conclusions Notwithstanding limitations due to variations in the availability of clinical information and differences in stage distribution between north/central and southern registries, our study shows that important disparities in cancer care persist across Italy. Thus the public health priority of reducing cancer survival disparities will not be achieved in the immediate future.</br
    corecore