3 research outputs found
Risk stratified follow-up for endometrial cancer: the cliniciansâ perspective
Risk-stratified follow-up for endometrial cancer (EC) is being introduced in many cancer centres, however there appears to be diversity in the structure and availability of schemes across the UK. This study aimed to investigate cliniciansâ and clinical specialist nursesâ (CNS) experiences of follow-up schemes for EC, including patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU), telephone follow-up (TFU) and clinician-led hospital follow-up (HFU). A mixed-methods study was conducted consisting of an online questionnaire to CNSs, an audience survey of participants attending a national âPersonalising endometrial cancer follow-upâ educational meeting, and qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews with clinicians involved in the follow-up of EC. Thematic analysis identified three main themes to describe cliniciansâ views: appropriate patient selection; changing from HFU to PIFU schemes; and the future of EC follow-up schemes. Many participants reported that the Covid-19 pandemic impacted on EC follow-up by accelerating the transition to PIFU/TFU. Overall, there was increasing support for non-HFU schemes for patients who have completed primary treatment of EC, however barriers were identified for non-English speaking patients and those who had communication challenges. Given the good long-term outcome associated with EC, greater focus is needed to develop resources to support patients post-treatment and individualise follow-up according to patientsâ personal needs and preferences.</p
Risk Stratified Follow-Up for Endometrial Cancer: The Cliniciansâ Perspective
Risk-stratified follow-up for endometrial cancer (EC) is being introduced in many cancer centres; however, there appears to be diversity in the structure and availability of schemes across the UK. This study aimed to investigate cliniciansâ and clinical specialist nursesâ (CNS) experiences of follow-up schemes for EC, including patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU), telephone follow-up (TFU) and clinician-led hospital follow-up (HFU). A mixed-methods study was conducted, consisting of an online questionnaire to CNSs, an audience survey of participants attending a national âPersonalising Endometrial Cancer Follow-upâ educational meeting, and qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews with clinicians involved in the follow-up of EC. Thematic analysis identified three main themes to describe cliniciansâ views: appropriate patient selection; changing from HFU to PIFU schemes; and the future of EC follow-up schemes. Many participants reported that the COVID-19 pandemic impacted EC follow-up by accelerating the transition to PIFU/TFU. Overall, there was increasing support for non-HFU schemes for patients who have completed primary treatment of EC; however, barriers were identified for non-English-speaking patients and those who had communication challenges. Given the good long-term outcome associated with EC, greater focus is needed to develop resources to support patients post-treatment and individualise follow-up according to patientsâ personal needs and preferences
British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) Uterine Cancer Guidelines: Recommendations for Practice
The remit of this guideline is to collate and propose evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of uterine cancer. This document covers all uterine cancers of any histological type