4 research outputs found

    Mortality Prediction after the First Year of Kidney Transplantation: An Observational Study on Two European Cohorts.

    Get PDF
    After the first year post transplantation, prognostic mortality scores in kidney transplant recipients can be useful for personalizing medical management. We developed a new prognostic score based on 5 parameters and computable at 1-year post transplantation. The outcome was the time between the first anniversary of the transplantation and the patient's death with a functioning graft. Afterwards, we appraised the prognostic capacities of this score by estimating time-dependent Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves from two prospective and multicentric European cohorts: the DIVAT (Données Informatisées et VAlidées en Transplantation) cohort composed of patients transplanted between 2000 and 2012 in 6 French centers; and the STCS (Swiss Transplant Cohort Study) cohort composed of patients transplanted between 2008 and 2012 in 6 Swiss centers. We also compared the results with those of two existing scoring systems: one from Spain (Hernandez et al.) and one from the United States (the Recipient Risk Score, RRS, Baskin-Bey et al.). From the DIVAT validation cohort and for a prognostic time at 10 years, the new prognostic score (AUC = 0.78, 95%CI = [0.69, 0.85]) seemed to present significantly higher prognostic capacities than the scoring system proposed by Hernandez et al. (p = 0.04) and tended to perform better than the initial RRS (p = 0.10). By using the Swiss cohort, the RRS and the the new prognostic score had comparable prognostic capacities at 4 years (AUC = 0.77 and 0.76 respectively, p = 0.31). In addition to the current available scores related to the risk to return in dialysis, we recommend to further study the use of the score we propose or the RRS for a more efficient personalized follow-up of kidney transplant recipients

    Early Steroid Withdrawal Compared With Steroid Avoidance Correlates With Graft Failure Among Kidney Transplant Recipients With an History of Diabetes

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND: Steroid minimization strategies attempt to reduce morbidity in kidney transplantation. Concern still exists regarding long-term outcomes using either steroid withdrawal or steroid avoidance regimens.METHODS: During a 10-year period, 572 primary kidney transplant recipients were treated with basiliximab, calcineurin inhibitors, and mycophenolate mofetil: 417 (72.9%) underwent a steroid-taper regimen over 2-3 months (steroid withdrawal) and 155 (27.1%), complete steroid avoidance (steroid avoidance).RESULTS: Despite no significant difference during the first 3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; P = .5349), steroid withdrawal recipients showed an increased risk of late acute rejection episodes (HR, 4.06; P = .0585), independent of recipient age >55 years (HR, 1.84; P = .0272). The risk of any adverse event was not different among steroid regimen groups (HR, 0.98; P = .8458), independent of recipient age >55 years (HR, 1.69; P = .0002), delayed graft function (DGF) (HR, 1.54; P = .0001), and positive donor Epstein-Barr virus serology (HR, 0.68; P = .0471). Intention-to-treat analyses revealed a significantly greater risk of graft failure only in diabetic recipients in the steroid withdrawal group (HR, 8.18; P = .0065), independent of confounding risk factors such as recipient age >55 years (HR, 1.99; P = .0244), >4 human leukocyte antigen-A, -B, and -DR incompatibilities (HR, 1.64; P = .0475), and DGF occurrence (HR, 2.63; P < .0001).CONCLUSION: Although both steroid minimization strategies were comparable regarding long-term safety and efficacy, an increased rate of graft failure was observed among diabetics who underwent steroid withdrawal compared with steroid avoidance

    Impact of Early Blood Transfusion After Kidney Transplantation on the Incidence of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies

    No full text
    International audienceLittle is known about the impact of posttransplant blood transfusion on the sensitization of anti-HLA antibodies and the formation of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). The aims of our study were to determine the 1-year incidence of DSAs (assessed using a solid-phase assay) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant patients who had or had not received a blood transfusion during the first year after transplantation. Included were 390 non– HLA-sensitized patients who had received an ABOcompatible kidney transplant and had not previously or simultaneously received a nonkidney transplant. Overall, 64% of patients received a red blood cell transfusion within the first year after transplantation, most within the first month. The overall 1-year incidence of DSAs was significantly higher in patients that had undergone transfusion (7.2% vs. 0.7% in patients with no transfusion, p < 0.0001). AMR occurred more often in the transfusion group (n = 15, 6%) compared with the nontransfusion group (n = 2, 1.4%; p = 0.04). Blood transfusion was an independent predictive factor for de novo DSA formation butnot for AMR. Patients who had a transfusion and developed DSAs were more often treated with cyclosporin A (n = 10, 55.5%) rather than tacrolimus (n = 45, 19.4%; p = 0.0001). In conclusion, early posttransplant blood transfusion may increase immunological risk, especially in underimmunosuppressed patients
    corecore