8 research outputs found

    Central retinal vein occlusion 36-month outcomes with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors: the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry

    Full text link
    PURPOSE To analyze the 3-year outcomes in a broad population of patients starting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in routine clinical practice. DESIGN Observational database study PARTICIPANTS: 527 treatment-naïve CRVO eyes that commenced VEGF inhibitors between December 1, 2010-2018 tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry. METHODS Longitudinal models were used to plot changes in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mean change in VA from baseline to 36 months, injections, visits, completion, switching and suspensions of therapy >180 days at final review. RESULTS Overall (527 eyes) mean VA change (95% CI) was +10 (7, 12) letters, 37% had final VA ≥70 and 30% ≤35 letters, mean CST changed -306μm. Completers (257/527, 49%) had mean 36-month changes in VA and CST of +12 letters and -324μm with a median of 18 injections at 26 visits. The adjusted mean VA change was similar with each VEGF inhibitor (mean, +11.4 letters) despite a greater reduction in CST with aflibercept (-310μm) vs. ranibizumab (-258μm) vs. bevacizumab (-216μm; P 73 letters, 42/527, 8%) lost 7 letters. Switching (160/527, 30%) was most often to aflibercept (79 eyes). Using suspensions and discontinuation reasons we identified similar proportions had ceased therapy (154/527, 29%) as were still receiving it at 36 months (165/527, 31%). Only 62/527 eyes (12%) had resolution of macular edema without treatment for over 6 months. CONCLUSIONS Patients with CRVO that commenced VEGF inhibitors in routine care for whom follow-up was available had VA improvements of around 12 letters at three years, but with more than 50% lost to follow the VA outcome for the entire group is likely worse. The choice of VEGF inhibitor influenced CST but not VA outcomes. We estimate that around half of eyes were still receiving injections after 36 months

    SARS-CoV-2 Omicron is an immune escape variant with an altered cell entry pathway

    Get PDF
    Vaccines based on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 are a cornerstone of the public health response to COVID-19. The emergence of hypermutated, increasingly transmissible variants of concern (VOCs) threaten this strategy. Omicron (B.1.1.529), the fifth VOC to be described, harbours multiple amino acid mutations in spike, half of which lie within the receptor-binding domain. Here we demonstrate substantial evasion of neutralization by Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants in vitro using sera from individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. These data were mirrored by a substantial reduction in real-world vaccine effectiveness that was partially restored by booster vaccination. The Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2 did not induce cell syncytia in vitro and favoured a TMPRSS2-independent endosomal entry pathway, these phenotypes mapping to distinct regions of the spike protein. Impaired cell fusion was determined by the receptor-binding domain, while endosomal entry mapped to the S2 domain. Such marked changes in antigenicity and replicative biology may underlie the rapid global spread and altered pathogenicity of the Omicron variant

    Computer and information systems in education

    No full text
    vii+152hlm.;21c

    Computers and information systems in education

    No full text
    viii+152hlm.;21c

    International impact of the covid-19 pandemic lockdown on intravitreal therapy outcomes. Fight Retinal Blindness Registry

    No full text
    International audiencePurpose: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns on the outcomes of eyes treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion in eight countries. Methods: A multicenter international database study of 5,782 eyes (4,708 patients) receiving intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections before, during, and after national lockdowns. The baseline visit was defined as the last visit within 3 months before lockdown, and prelockdown and postlockdown periods were defined as 6 months before and after the lockdown date. Results: Eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n = 4,649) lost vision in all countries in proportion to the reduced number of injections. The mean visual acuity change postlockdown ranged from -0.4 to -3.8 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters, and the median number of injections/visits decreased from 4-5/4-7 to 2-4/2-4 postlockdown. The diabetic macular edema (n = 654) and retinal vein occlusion (n = 479) eyes' mean visual acuity change ranged from -2.8 to +1.7 letters and -1.6 to +0.1 letters, and the median number of injections/visits decreased from 2.5-5/4-6 to 1-3/2-4 and from 3-5.5/4-5 to 1-3.5/2-3.5, respectively. The 6-month dropout rates postlockdown were 20% for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, 27% for diabetic macular edema, and 28% for retinal vein occlusion. Conclusion: This international study provides estimates of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on intravitreal therapy and suggests that prioritizing neovascular age-related macular degeneration eyes seems appropriate

    Measures of evidence-informed decision-making competence attributes: a psychometric systematic review

    No full text

    IASIL Bibliography 2012

    No full text

    IASIL Bibliography 2013

    No full text
    corecore