15 research outputs found

    Epistasis associated with QTLs.

    No full text
    <p>Epistatic interactions were detected associated with the markers on chromosome 2 and 10. Open circles and closed circles represent homozygous and heterozygous variants for the tested markers, respectively. Asterisks signify significant differences between the two genotypes (**<i>P</i><0.001; *<i>P</i><0.01; Mann-Whitney’s U test).</p

    Hemoglobin concentration and BUN and kidney injury in backcross mice.

    No full text
    <p>(A, left) Distributions of HGB and BUN in (ICGN×B6) F<sub>1</sub>×ICGN backcross progenies. (A, right) Distributions of HGB and BUN in B6-<i>Tns2<sup>nph</sup></i>, ICGN, (ICGN×B6) F<sub>1</sub>, backcross mice. (B) Glomerular index and tubular index distributions in (ICGN×B6) F<sub>1</sub>×ICGN backcross progenies. B6con, B6-<i>Tns2<sup>nph</sup></i>; BC, backcross mice; NS, no significant; asterisk, <i>P</i><0.001.</p

    Linkage of nephropathy to chromosome 2.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Genome-wide linkage analysis of the tubular index. (B) LOD plots show the linkage of nephropathic traits to chromosome 2. HGB (solid line) and tubular index (dotted line) yielded significant LOD scores. The approximate 95% confidential intervals: 19.6–56.4 cM (tubule), 26–73 cM (glomeruli), 26–55 cM (HGB), 23–59 cM (HCT), 27–72 cM (BUN). (C) LOD curve and bootstrap histogram of the QTL on chromosome 2 for tubular index.</p

    LOD score curves on chromosome 13.

    No full text
    <p>(A) A significant QTL for glomerular index was detected on chromosome 13. The approximate 95% confidential intervals: 0–31.5 cM. (B) Glomerular index at the peak LOD score (<i>D13Mit60</i>). The resistance phenotype associated with ICGN/B6 genotype (<i>P</i><0.001, Mann-Whitney’s U test).</p

    Prevention of neointimal formation using miRNA-126-containing nanoparticle-conjugated stents in a rabbit model

    No full text
    <div><p>Background</p><p>Despite recent progress with drug-eluting stents, restenosis and thrombosis after endovascular intervention are still major limitations in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. These problems are possibly caused by inappropriate inhibition of neointimal formation and retardation of re-endothelialization on the surface of the stents. miR-126 has been shown to have the potential to enhance vascular endothelial cell proliferation.</p><p>Methods and results</p><p>We designed and constructed a 27-nt double strand RNA (dsRNA) conjugated to cholesterol, which has high membrane permeability, and formed mature miR-126 after transfection. For site-specific induction of miR-126, we utilized poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles (NPs). miR-126-dsRNA-containing NPs (miR-126 NPs) significantly reduced the protein expression of a previously identified miR-126 target, SPRED1, in human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs), and miR-126 NPs enhanced the proliferation and migration of HUVECs. On the other hand, miR-126 NPs reduced the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, via the suppression of IRS-1. Finally, we developed a stent system that eluted miR-126. This delivery system exhibited significant inhibition of neointimal formation in a rabbit model of restenosis.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>miR-126 NP-conjugated stents significantly inhibited the development of neointimal hyperplasia in rabbits. The present study may indicate the possibility of a novel therapeutic option to prevent restenosis after angioplasty.</p></div

    Effect of miR-126 NPs on HUVECs.

    No full text
    <p>(A) mRNA expression changes of potential target genes of miR-126 in HUVECs determined by real-time PCR analyses. Values are means ± SEM; n = 5 each; *P<0.05, **P<0.01. ***P<0.001. (B) Protein levels of SPRED1 after addition of control RNA NPs and miR-126 NPs. Values are means ± SEM; n = 6 each; *P<0.05. (C) Proliferation of HUVECs determined by MTT assay. Values are means ± SEM; n = 8 each; *P<0.05, **P<0.01. ****P<0.0001. (D) Photograph of scratch assay and serial changes in the migration area determined using Image J. Values are means ± SEM; n = 8 each; *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. ****P<0.0001.</p

    Effect of miR-126 NPs on VSMCs.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Proliferation of VSMCs determined by cell count. Values are means ± SEM; n = 6 each; ***P<0.001. (B) Photograph of scratch assay and the serial changes in migration area determined using Image J. Values are means ± SEM; n = 4 each; *P<0.05. (C and D) Proliferation of VSMCs determined using an MTT assay. Values are means ± SEM; n = 6 each; *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. (E and F) Serial changes in migration area determined using Image J. Values are means ± SEM; n = 4 each; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.</p

    miR-126 NPs target IRS-1 in VSMCs.

    No full text
    <p>(A) miR-126 expression levels after the addition of miR-126 NPs and control NPs to VSMCs. Values are means ± SEM; n = 4 each; **P<0.001. (B) mRNA expression changes of potential target genes of miR-126 in VSMCs determined by real-time PCR analyses. Values are means ± SEM; n = 4 each; **P<0.01. (C) Protein levels of IRS-1 after addition of control RNA NPs and miR-126 NPs. Values are means ± SEM; n = 6 each; **P<0.001. (D) Conservation of the miR-126 target site in the 3’-UTR of IRS-1. (E) 3’-UTR reporter assay used to verify the target. Luciferase reporter activity of rabbit IRS-1 gene 3’-UTR constructs with or without mutation of the miR-126 binding site in 293T cells overexpressing miR-control and miR-126; n = 4 each; *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001.</p

    Structure of miR-126 dsRNA and miR-126 expression from miR-126 NPs <i>in vitro</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Structure of miR-126 dsRNA and control dsRNA. (B) miR-126 expression after the induction of miR-126 dsRNA and control dsRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 in 293T cells. Values are means ± SEM; n = 5 each; *P<0.05, **P<0.01. (C) Luciferase activity of a reporter gene with miR-126 binding sites. Values are means ± SEM; n = 4 each; *P<0.05, **P<0.01. (D) FITC levels in HUVECs after the addition of FITC-NPs. Fluorescence intensity (left panel) and phase contrast image (right panel). (E) Electron micrograph of miR-126 NPs and control NPs. (F) miR-126 expression levels after the addition of miR-126 NPs and control NPs in HUVECs. Values are means ± SEM; n = 4 each; *P<0.05, **P<0.01. ***P<0.001.</p
    corecore