Descriptive and inferential statistics relative to behavioural performance in the active task.

<p>Descriptive and inferential statistics relative to behavioural performance in the active task.</p

Driving with Intuition: A Preregistered Study about the EEG Anticipation of Simulated Random Car Accidents - Fig 2

<p>a) First person perspective of the car moving along the street in all the conditions of the “passive task”; b) Trial ending in ‘No Crash Baseline‘ and ‘No Crash End’ condition; c) Car presentation in ‘Crash End’; d) Trial ending with a car crash in ‘Crash End’ condition.</p

Statistically significant differences between power spectrum density in the comparison between No Crash Baseline vs Crash End Passive and No Crash Baseline vs No Crash Passive in the bands: Delta (2-4Hz), Theta (5-7Hz), Alpha (8-12Hz), Beta (15-29Hz).

<p>Statistically significant differences between power spectrum density in the comparison between No Crash Baseline vs Crash End Passive and No Crash Baseline vs No Crash Passive in the bands: Delta (2-4Hz), Theta (5-7Hz), Alpha (8-12Hz), Beta (15-29Hz).</p

Effect sizes with their corresponding 95% HDIs and BayesFactor values, of the comparisons between the three conditions using the channels emerged from the permutation analysis.

<p>Effect sizes with their corresponding 95% HDIs and BayesFactor values, of the comparisons between the three conditions using the channels emerged from the permutation analysis.</p

Topographical distribution of temporal evolution of the brain anticipatory activity in the Baseline and the two passive conditions.

<p>Topographical distribution of temporal evolution of the brain anticipatory activity in the Baseline and the two passive conditions.</p

Event Related Potentials of the pre-stimulus activity are represented on the left side of the figure.

<p>The time windows of analyses are highlighted. The topographical distributions of t-values are represented on right side of the figure. The white dots are the electrodes where the statistically significant differences are expressed. 4a) ‘Crash End’ and ‘No Crash End’,4b) ‘No Crash Baseline’ and ‘No Crash End’, 4c) ‘No Crash Baseline” and ‘Crash End’.</p

Experimental design.

<p>Passive or Active Task blocks were always presented after the Baseline condition. Blocks presentation was randomized between subjects. No-Crash End and Crash End conditions were randomized both in the Active and Passive Task.</p

Effect sizes with their corresponding 95% HDIs and BayesFactor values, of the comparisons between the mean amplitudes in the three conditions.

<p>Effect sizes with their corresponding 95% HDIs and BayesFactor values, of the comparisons between the mean amplitudes in the three conditions.</p