198 research outputs found

    Banks-Zaks fixed point analysis in momentum subtraction schemes

    Full text link
    We analyse the critical exponents relating to the quark mass anomalous dimension and beta-function at the Banks-Zaks fixed point in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) in a variety of representations for the quark in the momentum subtraction (MOM) schemes of Celmaster and Gonsalves. For a specific range of values of the number of quark flavours, estimates of the exponents appear to be scheme independent. Using the recent five loop modified minimal subtraction (MSbar) scheme quark mass anomalous dimension and estimates of the fixed point location we estimate the associated exponent as 0.263-0.268 for the SU(3) colour group and 12 flavours when the quarks are in the fundamental representation.Comment: 33 latex pages, 25 tables, anc directory contains txt file with electronic version of renormalization group function

    AAindex: amino acid index database, progress report 2008

    Get PDF
    AAindex is a database of numerical indices representing various physicochemical and biochemical properties of amino acids and pairs of amino acids. We have added a collection of protein contact potentials to the AAindex as a new section. Accordingly AAindex consists of three sections now: AAindex1 for the amino acid index of 20 numerical values, AAindex2 for the amino acid substitution matrix and AAindex3 for the statistical protein contact potentials. All data are derived from published literature. The database can be accessed through the DBGET/LinkDB system at GenomeNet (http://www.genome.jp/dbget-bin/www_bfind?aaindex) or downloaded by anonymous FTP (ftp://ftp.genome.jp/pub/db/community/aaindex/)

    Direct CP violation and the ΔI=1/2 rule in K→ππ decay from the standard model

    Get PDF
    We present a lattice QCD calculation of the ΔI=1/2, K→ππ decay amplitude A0 and ϵ′, the measure of direct CP violation in K→ππ decay, improving our 2015 calculation [1] of these quantities. Both calculations were performed with physical kinematics on a 323×64 lattice with an inverse lattice spacing of a-1=1.3784(68)  GeV. However, the current calculation includes nearly 4 times the statistics and numerous technical improvements allowing us to more reliably isolate the ππ ground state and more accurately relate the lattice operators to those defined in the standard model. We find Re(A0)=2.99(0.32)(0.59)×10-7  GeV and Im(A0)=-6.98(0.62)(1.44)×10-11  GeV, where the errors are statistical and systematic, respectively. The former agrees well with the experimental result Re(A0)=3.3201(18)×10-7  GeV. These results for A0 can be combined with our earlier lattice calculation of A2 [2] to obtain Re(ϵ′/ϵ)=21.7(2.6)(6.2)(5.0)×10-4, where the third error represents omitted isospin breaking effects, and Re(A0)/Re(A2)=19.9(2.3)(4.4). The first agrees well with the experimental result of Re(ϵ′/ϵ)=16.6(2.3)×10-4. A comparison of the second with the observed ratio Re(A0)/Re(A2)=22.45(6), demonstrates the standard model origin of this “ΔI=1/2 rule” enhancement.We present a lattice QCD calculation of the ΔI=1/2\Delta I=1/2, KππK\to\pi\pi decay amplitude A0A_0 and ε\varepsilon', the measure of direct CP-violation in KππK\to\pi\pi decay, improving our 2015 calculation of these quantities. Both calculations were performed with physical kinematics on a 323×6432^3\times 64 lattice with an inverse lattice spacing of a1=1.3784(68)a^{-1}=1.3784(68) GeV. However, the current calculation includes nearly four times the statistics and numerous technical improvements allowing us to more reliably isolate the ππ\pi\pi ground-state and more accurately relate the lattice operators to those defined in the Standard Model. We find Re(A0)=2.99(0.32)(0.59)×107{\rm Re}(A_0)=2.99(0.32)(0.59)\times 10^{-7} GeV and Im(A0)=6.98(0.62)(1.44)×1011{\rm Im}(A_0)=-6.98(0.62)(1.44)\times 10^{-11} GeV, where the errors are statistical and systematic, respectively. The former agrees well with the experimental result Re(A0)=3.3201(18)×107{\rm Re}(A_0)=3.3201(18)\times 10^{-7} GeV. These results for A0A_0 can be combined with our earlier lattice calculation of A2A_2 to obtain Re(ε/ε)=21.7(2.6)(6.2)(5.0)×104{\rm Re}(\varepsilon'/\varepsilon)=21.7(2.6)(6.2)(5.0) \times 10^{-4}, where the third error represents omitted isospin breaking effects, and Re(A0)(A_0)/Re(A2)=19.9(2.3)(4.4)(A_2) = 19.9(2.3)(4.4). The first agrees well with the experimental result of Re(ε/ε)=16.6(2.3)×104{\rm Re}(\varepsilon'/\varepsilon)=16.6(2.3)\times 10^{-4}. A comparison of the second with the observed ratio Re(A0)/(A_0)/Re(A2)=22.45(6)(A_2) = 22.45(6), demonstrates the Standard Model origin of this "ΔI=1/2\Delta I = 1/2 rule" enhancement
    corecore