Oral cannabinoid-rich THC/CBD cannabis extract for secondary prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting : a study protocol for a pilot and definitive randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial (CannabisCINV)

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains an important issue for patients receiving chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic therapy. Trials using delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-rich (THC) products demonstrate limited antiemetic effect, significant adverse events and flawed study design. Trials using cannabidiol-rich (CBD) products demonstrate improved efficacy and psychological adverse event profile. No definitive trials have been conducted to support the use of cannabinoids for this indication, nor has the potential economic impact of incorporating such regimens into the Australian healthcare system been established. CannabisCINV aims to assess the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of adding TN-TC11M, an oral THC/CBD extract to guideline-consistent antiemetics in the secondary prevention of CINV. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The current multicentre, 1:1 randomised cross-over, placebo-controlled pilot study will recruit 80 adult patients with any malignancy, experiencing CINV during moderate to highly emetogenic chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetics. Patients receive oral TN-TC11M (THC 2.5mg/CBD 2.5 mg) capsules or placebo capsules three times a day on day -1 to day 5 of cycle A of chemotherapy, followed by the alternative drug regimen during cycle B of chemotherapy and the preferred drug regimen during cycle C. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects attaining a complete response to CINV. Secondary and tertiary endpoints include regimen tolerability, impact on quality of life and health system resource use. The primary assessment tool is patient diaries, which are filled from day -1 to day 5. A subsequent randomised placebo-controlled parallel phase III trial will recruit a further 250 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by ethics review committees for all participating sites. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences.Tilray. PROTOCOL VERSION: 2.0, 9 June 2017

Health-related quality of life in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving maintenance olaparib

Background: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer often have a detriment in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In the randomized, double-blind, phase III POLO trial progression-free survival was significantly longer with maintenance olaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, than placebo in patients with a germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm) and metastatic pancreatic cancer whose disease had not progressed during first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The prespecified HRQoL evaluation is reported here. Patients and methods: Patients were randomized to receive maintenance olaparib (300 mg b.i.d.; tablets) or placebo. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item module at baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression, at discontinuation, and 30 days after last dose. Scores ranged from 0 to 100; a ≥10-point change or difference between arms was considered clinically meaningful. Adjusted mean change from baseline was analysed using a mixed model for repeated measures. Time to sustained clinically meaningful deterioration (TSCMD) was analysed using a log-rank test. Results: Of 154 randomized patients, 89 of 92 olaparib-arm and 58 of 62 placebo-arm patients were included in HRQoL analyses. The adjusted mean change in Global Health Status (GHS) score from baseline was <10 points in both arms and there was no significant between-group difference [-2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) -7.27, 2.33; P = 0.31]. Analysis of physical functioning scores showed a significant between-group difference (-4.45 points; 95% CI -8.75, -0.16; P = 0.04). There was no difference in TSCMD for olaparib versus placebo for GHS [P = 0.25; hazard ratio (HR) 0.72; 95% CI 0.41, 1.27] or physical functioning (P = 0.32; HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.73, 2.63). Conclusions: HRQoL was preserved with maintenance olaparib treatment with no clinically meaningful difference compared with placebo. These results support the observed efficacy benefit of maintenance olaparib in patients with a gBRCAm and metastatic pancreatic cancer. ClincalTrials.gov number: NCT02184195

NUTMEG: A randomized phase II study of nivolumab and temozolomide versus temozolomide alone in newly diagnosed older patients with glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: There is an immunologic rationale to evaluate immunotherapy in the older glioblastoma population, who have been underrepresented in prior trials. The NUTMEG study evaluated the combination of nivolumab and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma aged 65 years and older. METHODS: NUTMEG was a multicenter 2:1 randomized phase II trial for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma aged 65 years and older. The experimental arm consisted of hypofractionated chemoradiation with temozolomide, then adjuvant nivolumab and temozolomide. The standard arm consisted of hypofractionated chemoradiation with temozolomide, then adjuvant temozolomide. The primary objective was to improve overall survival (OS) in the experimental arm. RESULTS: A total of 103 participants were randomized, with 69 in the experimental arm and 34 in the standard arm. The median (range) age was 73 (65-88) years. After 37 months of follow-up, the median OS was 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.7-13.4) in the experimental arm and 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-14.8) in the standard arm. For the experimental arm relative to the standard arm, the OS hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.54-1.33). In the experimental arm, there were three grade 3 immune-related adverse events which resolved, with no unexpected serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Due to insufficient evidence of benefit with nivolumab, the decision was made not to transition to a phase III trial. No new safety signals were identified with nivolumab. This complements the existing series of immunotherapy trials. Research is needed to identify biomarkers and new strategies including combinations

Patterns of care and outcomes among triple-negative early breast cancer patients in South Western Sydney

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 12-24% of all breast cancer and carries a poor prognosis upon recurrence. Little is known of the treatment, or timing and frequency of recurrences outside of a clinical trial. Aim: We describe the patterns of care and outcomes of women with TNBC treated at two cancer centres in Sydney, NSW, Australia, to help oncologists talk to women with this subtype of breast cancer about their likely prognosis. Methods: We searched the electronic medical record for women with stages I–III TNBC diagnosed from 2006 to 2014. For each woman, we recorded demographics, tumour characteristics, treatment details, recurrences and survival using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: We identified 137 women with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range (IQR) 44–63). The median tumour size was 25 mm (IQR 16–35). Most women had grade 3 (92%) and ductal carcinomas (89%), and 35% were node positive; 113 (82%) patients received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The most prescribed regimens for node-negative tumours were: fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) Ã 6 (23pts, 35%), and for node-positive tumours, FEC-Docetaxel (18pts, 40%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered to 114 (83%) patients. After a median follow up of 40 months, 17 patients (12%) had a recurrence. All but one recurrence (94%) occurred within 3 years of diagnosis. Twelve women received palliative chemotherapy, and 14 women have died. The median survival from the time of recurrence was 18 months (IQR 5–26). Seven women (5%) had a documented BRCA1 mutation, and four women (3%) had a documented BRCA2 mutation. Conclusions: TNBC affects women at a relatively young age and tends to recur early. Survival following metastatic disease is short, and more effective therapies are needed

Small HER2-positive breast cancer : should size affect adjuvant treatment?

Limited data exist regarding the effect of adjuvant trastuzumab in women with small, node-negative, HER2- positive breast cancers. We examined outcomes for women with £ 2-cm, node negative, HER2-positive breast cancer treated in 4 cancer centers in Australia and found that adjuvant trastuzumab administered with chemotherapy reduced recurrence and improved survival. Introduction: The adjuvant trastuzumab trials largely excluded women with small, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancers. Accordingly, limited data exist regarding the effect of trastuzumab in the management of these patients. Our aim was to assess the outcomes of, and treatments administered to, women with small (≤amp; 2 cm), node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer in 4 Australian cancer centers. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of data on all women with node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancers ≤ 2 cm diagnosed between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2011 and treated at 4 cancer centers in Sydney, Australia was undertaken. The primary outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 128 patients with node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancers ≤amp; 2 cm were identified. Of these, 83 women (65%) received adjuvant trastuzumab which, in 96% of cases, was in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy. At 3-year follow-up, the RFS was 100% and 79.2% and the OS was 100% and 92.6% for women treated with, and without, trastuzumab, respectively. There were 14 recurrence events and 6 deaths in the study population. There were no significant differences in RFS and OS for the 46 women treated with, or without, trastuzumab for those with tumors ≤ 1 cm. Conclusion: There is a growing body of evidence to support the use of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy in the management of small, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancers. However, future studies with longer follow-up and prospective biomarker analysis might assist in clinical decision-making for this patient group

Outcomes of extensive stage extrapulmonary small cell cancer

Background: Extrapulmonary small cell cancer (EPSCC) is a rare malignancy with an incidence of approximately 0.1%–0.4% of all cancers. Treatment of this disease is often based on small cell lung cancer. Aims: We aimed to investigate real-world clinical outcomes of patients with extensive-stage (ES) ESPCC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ES EPSCC between 2010 and 2020 from multiple centres in New South Wales were identified. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics were collected and presented using descriptive statistics. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression hazard models were used to identify potential prognostic factors. Results: Sixty eligible ES EPSCC patients were identified, including 65% male and 35% female. The mean age was 69 years (range 37–88). Forty-five per cent were never smokers, 42% ex-smokers and 13% current smokers, and 17% of patients had limited-stage disease prior to development of ES disease. The most common primary sites were genitourinary (42%; mainly prostate (n = 14) and bladder (n = 10)), gastrointestinal (28%; mainly oesophagus (n = 5) and colon (n = 4)) and unknown primary (22%). Treatments received included palliative chemotherapy (67%), palliative radiotherapy (53%), palliative surgery (13%) and best supportive care alone (13%). The median overall survival (OS) was 8.0 months. The median progression-free survival was 5.4 months, and response rate to first-line chemotherapy was 65%. Platinum-based chemotherapy was prognostic of longer OS (HR 0.27, CI 0.12–0.60, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with ES EPSCC had good response to palliative chemotherapy, but OS remained poor. Further research is required to improve the prognosis in this population

Timing and patterns of referral to palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD)

Aim: To examine the timing and patterns of referral to the PC service for patients with metastatic NSCLC to assess its impact on survival and other clinical indicators. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC treated in the Liverpool and/or Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres. Patients were identified using an institutional electronic database. Patients were analysed pre- (1/1/2008–31/12/2009) and post-Temel (1/1/2011–31/12/2012), respectively, to identify any changes in referral patterns. Due to Temel’s publication, patients diagnosed in 2010 were excluded. Early referral to PC was defined as within 8 weeks of diagnosis. Cox regression was used to analyse OS between early and late groups. Results: 266 patients were included: 134 from 2008–2009 and 132 from 2011–2012. The median age at diagnosis was 66 (range 31–91) with 65% male, 84% ex- or current smokers and 78% were English speaking. 249 (94%) were referred to PC; 159 (64%) were referred early and 90 (36%) late. In the early group, 46% were ECOG PS 0–1 at diagnosis, compared to 85% in the late group. Hospitalisations were similar between the early and late groups with mean number of admissions being 2.8, and the mean length of stay (total number of days in hospital from diagnosis to death) was 30.2 days. Of the 244 patients analysed for survival, median OS for the early and late groups were 3.1 months vs. 9.8 months, respectively (HR 0.42; 95%CI 0.32–0.56; p < 0.0001). There was no change in referral patterns pre- or post-Temel. Conclusion: This suggests timing of PC referrals is tailored according to patient factors and physician discretion in our SWSLHD. However, our results showed early referral to PC did not improve OS in this cohort and Temel’s publication has not changed our practice

New frontiers in circulating tumour cell analysis : a reference guide for bimolecular profiling towards translational clinical use

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are now routinely isolated from blood, and measurement of CTC concentrations appears to correlate well with survival in patients with cancer. Interrogation of the molecular profile of CTCs for expression of protein biomarkers, genetic variants and gene expression provides opportunities to use this information to guide personalized treatment, monitor therapy and detect emerging resistance. However, successful application of profiling techniques requires analyses that deliver a reliable and clinically relevant representation of a patient's cancer as it changes with time. Here, we comprehensively review the current knowledge of therapeutically relevant biomarkers in isolated CTCs obtained by fluorescence imaging and genomic profiling approaches. The reviewed data support the notion that molecular profiling of CTCs will provide a reliable representation or surrogate index of tumor burden. Large-scale translational trials, many currently in progress, will provide critical data to progress CTC analysis toward wider clinical use in personalized treatment

Predictive and prognostic value of circulating tumor cell detection in lung cancer : a clinician's perspective

There is increasing evidence for the use of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as a "liquid biopsy" for early detection of lung cancer recurrence, prognosticating disease and monitoring treatment response. Further, CTC molecular analysis and interrogation of single cells hold significant potential in providing insights into tumor biology and the metastatic process. Ongoing research will likely see the translation of CTCs as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in both small cell, and non-small cell, lung cancer to routine clinical practice

Circulating tumour cells : a bona fide cause of metastatic cancer

Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are emerging as important prognostic markers and have potential clinical utility as tumour biomarkers for targeted cancer therapy. Although CTCs were proposed more than 100 years ago as potential precursors that may form metastatic lesions, formal evidence that CTCs are indeed capable of initiating metastases is limited. Moreover, the process of CTCs shedding into the circulation, relocating to distant organ sites and initiating metastatic foci is complex and intrinsically inefficient. To partially explain the metastatic process, the concepts of CTCs as metastatic precursors or pre-metastatic conditioners have been proposed; however, it is questionable as to whether these are both variable pathways to metastasis or just markers of metastatic burden. This review explores the evidence for CTCs in the initiation and progression of metastatic cancer and the data supporting these different concepts in an attempt to better understand the role of CTCs in metastasis. A greater understanding of the metastatic potential of CTCs will open new avenues for therapeutic interventions in the future