Vitamin D Binding Protein and Monocyte Response to 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: Analysis by Mathematical Modeling

Vitamin D binding protein (DBP) plays a key role in the bioavailability of active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) and its precursor 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), but accurate analysis of DBP-bound and free 25OHD and 1,25(OH)2D is difficult. To address this, two new mathematical models were developed to estimate: 1) serum levels of free 25OHD/1,25(OH)2D based on DBP concentration and genotype; 2) the impact of DBP on the biological activity of 25OHD/1,25(OH)2D in vivo. The initial extracellular steady state (eSS) model predicted that 50 nM 25OHD and 100 pM 1,25(OH)2D), <0.1% 25OHD and <1.5% 1,25(OH)2D are ‘free’ in vivo. However, for any given concentration of total 25OHD, levels of free 25OHD are higher for low affinity versus high affinity forms of DBP. The eSS model was then combined with an intracellular (iSS) model that incorporated conversion of 25OHD to 1,25(OH)2D via the enzyme CYP27B1, as well as binding of 1,25(OH)2D to the vitamin D receptor (VDR). The iSS model was optimized to 25OHD/1,25(OH)2D-mediated in vitro dose-responsive induction of the vitamin D target gene cathelicidin (CAMP) in human monocytes. The iSS model was then used to predict vitamin D activity in vivo (100% serum). The predicted induction of CAMP in vivo was minimal at basal settings but increased with enhanced expression of VDR (5-fold) and CYP27B1 (10-fold). Consistent with the eSS model, the iSS model predicted stronger responses to 25OHD for low affinity forms of DBP. Finally, the iSS model was used to compare the efficiency of endogenously synthesized versus exogenously added 1,25(OH)2D. Data strongly support the endogenous model as the most viable mode for CAMP induction by vitamin D in vivo. These novel mathematical models underline the importance of DBP as a determinant of vitamin D ‘status’ in vivo, with future implications for clinical studies of vitamin D status and supplementation

Activation of the steroid and xenobiotic receptor, SXR, induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The steroid and xenobiotic receptor, SXR, is an orphan nuclear receptor that regulates metabolism of diverse dietary, endobiotic, and xenobiotic compounds. SXR is expressed at high levels in the liver and intestine, and at lower levels in breast and other tissues where its function was unknown. Since many breast cancer preventive and therapeutic compounds are SXR activators, we hypothesized that some beneficial effects of these compounds are mediated through SXR.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To test this hypothesis, we measured proliferation of breast cancer cells in response to SXR activators and evaluated consequent changes in the expression of genes critical for proliferation and cell-cycle control using quantitative RT-PCR and western blotting. Results were confirmed using siRNA-mediated gene knockdown. Statistical analysis was by t-test or ANOVA and a P value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be significant.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Many structurally and functionally distinct SXR activators inhibited the proliferation of MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells by inducing cell cycle arrest at the G1/S phase followed by apoptosis. Decreased growth in response to SXR activation was associated with stabilization of p53 and up-regulation of cell cycle regulatory and pro-apoptotic genes such as p21, PUMA and BAX. These gene expression changes were preceded by an increase in inducible nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide in these cells. Inhibition of iNOS blocked the induction of p53. p53 knockdown inhibited up-regulation of p21 and BAX. We infer that NO is required for p53 induction and that p53 is required for up-regulation of cell cycle regulatory and apoptotic genes in this system. SXR activator-induced increases in iNOS levels were inhibited by siRNA-mediated knockdown of SXR, indicating that SXR activation is necessary for subsequent regulation of iNOS expression.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We conclude that activation of SXR is anti-proliferative in p53 wild type breast cancer cells and that this effect is mechanistically dependent upon the local production of NO and NO-dependent up-regulation of p53. These findings reveal a novel biological function for SXR and suggest that a subset of SXR activators may function as effective therapeutic and chemo-preventative agents for certain types of breast cancers.</p

Development and Refinement of Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) DNA Binding Site Model Using Information Theory

The pregnane X receptor (PXR) acts as a receptor to induce gene expression in response to structurally diverse xenobiotics through binding as a heterodimer with the 9-cis retinoic acid receptor (RXR) to enhancers in target gene promoters. We identified and estimated the affinities of novel PXR/RXR binding sites in regulated genes and additional genomic targets of PXR with an information theory-based model of the PXR/RXR binding site. Our initial PXR/RXR model, the result of the alignment of 15 previously characterized binding sites, was used to scan the promoters of known PXR target genes. Sites from these genes, with information contents of \u3e8 bits bound by PXR/RXR in vitro, were used to revise the information weight matrix; this procedure was repeated by screening for progressively weaker binding sites. After three iterations of refinement, the model was based on 48 validated PXR/RXR binding sites and has an average information content (Rsequence) of 14.43 ± 3.21 bits. A scan of the human genome predicted novel PXR/RXR binding sites in the promoters of UGT1A3 (19.78 bits at –8040 and 16.37 bits at –6930) and UGT1A6 (12.74 bits at –9216), both of which were identified previously as targets for PXR. These sites were subsequently demonstrated to specifically bind PXR/RXR in competition electrophoretic mobility shift assays. A strong PXR site was also predicted upstream of the CASP10 gene (18.69 bits at –7872) and was validated by binding studies and reporter assays as a PXR responsive element. This suggests that the PXR-mediated response extends beyond genes involved in drug biotransformation and transport