Randomized controlled trials and real-world data : differences and similarities to untangle literature data

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent the gold-standard of medical evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of therapeutic interventions. However, the need to minimize bias and ensure the correct design to explore the study aims often affects the generalizability of results. As a consequence, the evidence derived from the most rigorous research strategy available is not always representative of the real-world settings for which this evidence is ultimately intended. Observational studies, in contrast, although affected by a number of potential confounders, can more effectively capture treatment characteristics and safety issues that had not been identified by previous RCTs, owing to the short duration of follow-up or highly selective inclusion criteria. The aim of this review is to provide a comparative summary of the main advantages and pitfalls of RCTs and real-world data, emphasizing the need for a constant integration of all available levels of evidence to provide the best care for patients

switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation of abatacept different results in a series of 21 patients

To the Editor: We read with interest the article by Reggia, et al 1, a monocentric study analyzing the efficacy and safety of switching from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) formulation of abatacept (ABA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The authors report a relatively high risk of disease relapse (27%) occurring in a mean of 11 weeks after switching to SC administration. The study did not find any significant predictive factor for a switch failure. The concern that patients with a higher body mass index could receive lower cumulative doses compared to weight-tiered monthly infusions, leading to a significant influence on treatment efficacy, was not confirmed by this study, or by previous dose-finding trials and … Address correspondence to Dr. S. Monti; E-mail: sara.saramonti{at}gmail.co

20 years of experience with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors : what have we learned?

TNF inhibitors are biologic DMARDs approved for the treatment of active RA in mid-1990s. They still represent a valuable therapeutic option to control the activity, disability and radiographic progression of the disease. In the context of TNF inhibitors, there are currently several molecules and different administration routes that provide optimal treatment personalization, allowing us to respond to a patient's needs in the best possible way. The increasing use of TNF inhibitors has not only improved the management of RA, but it has also helped in our understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease. This review focuses on the basis of this targeted therapy and on the knowledge gained from their use about therapeutic effects and adverse events. Effectiveness analysed from drug registries and safety issues are presented together with recent data on infections (in particular, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hepatitis B), cancer (lymphoma, skin cancers) and cardiovascular risk

LncRNA NEAT1 in Paraspeckles: A Structural Scaffold for Cellular DNA Damage Response Systems?

Nuclear paraspeckle assembly transcript 1 (NEAT1) is a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) reported to be frequently deregulated in various types of cancers and neurodegenerative processes. NEAT1 is an indispensable structural component of paraspeckles (PSs), which are dynamic and membraneless nuclear bodies that affect different cellular functions, including stress response. Furthermore, increasing evidence supports the crucial role of NEAT1 and essential structural proteins of PSs (PSPs) in the regulation of the DNA damage repair (DDR) system. This review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on the involvement of NEAT1 and PSPs in DDR, which might strengthen the rationale underlying future NEAT1-based therapeutic options in tumor and neurodegenerative diseases

Gene expression profiling reveals novel protective effects of Aminaphtone on ECV304 endothelial cells

n/

Does Adiponectin Act as an Antiangiogenic Factor in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

Angiogenesis is involved in the pathogenesis of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and high microvascular density has been found in CLL to be associated with a poor prognosis. In this study, we assessed serum levels of adiponectin in 69 patients with Binet stage A B-CLL, and these values were retrospectively correlated with bone marrow (BM) microvessel area and serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), angiogenin, PECAM-1 (CD31), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), interleukin-8 (IL-8), syndecan-1, and the percentage of CD38+ or ZAP-70+ CLL cells. The positive correlation between serum levels of adiponectin and VEGF (P = .03) does not translate into an increase of the extent of BM angiogenesis (P = .404), FGF-2 (P = .348), angiogenin (P = .402), and CD31 (P = .248) serum concentrations. Accordingly, IL-8 (P = .175), syndecan-1 (P = .06), and MMP-9 (P = .144) circulating levels were not likely to reflect adiponectin concentration. Furthermore, patients with higher levels of adiponectin had a more favorable biological profile as defined by a lower number of both CD38− (r = −0.294; P = .02) and ZAP-70+ (r = −0.285; P = .04). Finally, we evaluated the presence of adiponectin in B-CLL cells at gene expression level. RMA intensity values for adiponectin gene transcript denote a homogeneous low expression in B-CLL cells, whereas VEGF transcript was highly expressed with a degree of interpatient variability. Overall, these data seem to indicate that adiponectin could be involved as an antiangiogenic factor in B-CLL

Methotrexate and Rheumatoid Arthritis : Current Evidence Regarding Subcutaneous Versus Oral Routes of Administration

Methotrexate (MTX) is still considered the drug of choice in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Comparing subcutaneous (MTX SC) and oral (MTX OR) routes of administration is important to optimize the everyday therapeutic strategy in the real-life setting. This review summarizes scientific evidence currently available on this topic. As shown by pharmacokinetic studies, at the same dose level, bioavailability of MTX SC is significantly higher and less variable than that of MTX OR. This difference is even more pronounced for medium-to-high dosages (i.e., >15 mg/week). With regard to clinical response (Disease Activity Score-28, American College of Rheumatology Criteria), randomized, double-blind studies and retrospective or longitudinal analyses in real-life settings showed that MTX SC is more effective than MTX OR. This is true both in MTX-naive patients with early RA, and in patients who switch from MTX OR to MTX SC due to previous treatment failure, lack of efficacy and/or adverse events. Finally, MTX SC has a better tolerability profile than MTX OR, with fewer gastroenterological side effects. Delaying the use of more expensive biological therapies by switching from MTX OR to MTX SC in non-responders might provide cost savings, with relevant implications in the management of patients with RA. Funding: Alfa Wassermann

The Notch pathway drives the ability of the bone marrow niche to promote RNA editing in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most frequently diagnosed hematological malignancy, and despite all the therapeutic advances it remains incurable due to the development of drug resistance. Recently, RNA editing has emerged as one of the important mechanisms that determines expression variability and therefore may be involved in the development of resistance to standard therapy. This process is mediated by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes that convert adenosines to inosines (A-->I editing) in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) substrates. We hypothesize that ADAR1 activation in MM cells may be promoted by the normal cells of the bone marrow (BM) niche through the release of pro-tumor factor controlled by the oncogenic Notch pathway. Indeed, Notch is known to be hyperactivated in myeloma and it is crucial for the pathologic crosstalk between tumor cells and the surrounding BM microenvironment. Aim of this work was to investigate how the Notch pathway contributes to the ability of the BM microenvironment stromal cells on their ability to boost RNA editing and drug resistance in MM, in order to provide the rationale for a Notch-directed therapy that may allow to inhibit the progression of this disease

ZNF521 Enhances MLL-AF9-Dependent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transformation in Acute Myeloid Leukemias by Altering the Gene Expression Landscape

Leukemias derived from the MLL-AF9 rearrangement rely on dysfunctional transcriptional networks. ZNF521, a transcription co-factor implicated in the control of hematopoiesis, has been proposed to sustain leukemic transformation in collaboration with other oncogenes. Here, we demonstrate that ZNF521 mRNA levels correlate with specific genetic aberrations: in particular, the highest expression is observed in AMLs bearing MLL rearrangements, while the lowest is detected in AMLs with FLT3-ITD, NPM1, or CEBPα double mutations. In cord blood-derived CD34(+) cells, enforced expression of ZNF521 provides a significant proliferative advantage and enhances MLL-AF9 effects on the induction of proliferation and the expansion of leukemic progenitor cells. Transcriptome analysis of primary CD34(+) cultures displayed subsets of genes up-regulated by MLL-AF9 or ZNF521 single transgene overexpression as well as in MLL-AF9/ZNF521 combinations, at either the early or late time points of an in vitro leukemogenesis model. The silencing of ZNF521 in the MLL-AF9 + THP-1 cell line coherently results in an impairment of growth and clonogenicity, recapitulating the effects observed in primary cells. Taken together, these results underscore a role for ZNF521 in sustaining the self-renewal of the immature AML compartment, most likely through the perturbation of the gene expression landscape, which ultimately favors the expansion of MLL-AF9-transformed leukemic clones