67 research outputs found
Gait Measurements and Motor Recovery after Stroke
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 62P10, 92C20Gait analysis is one of the methods used for estimation of the degree of restoration of motor recovery after stroke. The purpose of the present study was to examine the diagnostic value of the footprint parameters and their relationship with the functional ambulation profile (FAP) scores provided automatically by the pressure sensor walkway system for gait examination. The patterns of walking were studied in a group of 23 patients with chronic unilateral stroke and 72 healthy subjects. Among the measured gait variables the peak times of the footprints were found as most informative parameters. Their predictive value was compared with some other gait indicators
for motor recovery after stroke
Orthostatic Reactivity in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy
AIM: The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of a structured physical therapy (PT) programme on the orthostatic reactivity in patients with diabetic neuropathy (DNP).MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed in 90 patients with DNP (34 male and 56 female, mean ages 60.8 ΓΒ± 7.8 years) of lower extremities. The orthostatic autoregulation was evaluated using an active orthostatic test. The arterial blood pressure and the heart rate were determined after 10 minutes of rest in lying position before and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of active standing.RESULTS: At the start of the study a normotonic orthostatic reactivity (NOR) was observed in 32 patients. Abnormal sympathicotonic type of orthostatic reactivity (SOR) was found in 18 patients and asympaticotonic type of orthostatic reactivity (AOR) was established in the remaining 40 patients. After the PT treatment a significant improvement of the orthostatic autoregulation in the groups with SOR and AOR was not found Γ’β¬β NOR was observed in 66 patients with DNP (80.3%) at 6 weeks after the start of PT.CONCLUSION: The applied structured PT, later continued as a home exercise programme, significantly improved the orthostatic reactivity in patients with orthostatic dysregulation due to DNP
Abnormal joint torque patterns exhibited by chronic stroke subjects while walking with a prescribed physiological gait pattern
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It is well documented that individuals with chronic stroke often exhibit considerable gait impairments that significantly impact their quality of life. While stroke subjects often walk asymmetrically, we sought to investigate whether prescribing near normal physiological gait patterns with the use of the Lokomat robotic gait-orthosis could help ameliorate asymmetries in gait, specifically, promote similar ankle, knee, and hip joint torques in both lower extremities. We hypothesized that hemiparetic stroke subjects would demonstrate significant differences in total joint torques in both the frontal and sagittal planes compared to non-disabled subjects despite walking under normal gait kinematic trajectories.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A motion analysis system was used to track the kinematic patterns of the pelvis and legs of 10 chronic hemiparetic stroke subjects and 5 age matched controls as they walked in the Lokomat. The subject's legs were attached to the Lokomat using instrumented shank and thigh cuffs while instrumented footlifters were applied to the impaired foot of stroke subjects to aid with foot clearance during swing. With minimal body-weight support, subjects walked at 2.5 km/hr on an instrumented treadmill capable of measuring ground reaction forces. Through a custom inverse dynamics model, the ankle, knee, and hip joint torques were calculated in both the frontal and sagittal planes. A single factor ANOVA was used to investigate differences in joint torques between control, unimpaired, and impaired legs at various points in the gait cycle.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>While the kinematic patterns of the stroke subjects were quite similar to those of the control subjects, the kinetic patterns were very different. During stance phase, the unimpaired limb of stroke subjects produced greater hip extension and knee flexion torques than the control group. At pre-swing, stroke subjects inappropriately extended their impaired knee, while during swing they tended to abduct their impaired leg, both being typical abnormal torque synergy patterns common to stroke gait.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Despite the Lokomat guiding stroke subjects through physiologically symmetric kinematic gait patterns, abnormal asymmetric joint torque patterns are still generated. These differences from the control group are characteristic of the hip hike and circumduction strategy employed by stroke subjects.</p
Evaluation of gait symmetry in poliomyelitis subjects : Comparison of a conventional knee ankle foot orthosis (KAFO) and a new powered KAFO.
Background: Compared to able-bodied subjects, subjects with post polio syndrome and poliomyelitis demonstrate a preference for weight-bearing on the non-paretic limb, causing gait asymmetry.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the gait symmetry of the poliomyelitis subjects when ambulating with either a drop- locked knee ankle foot orthosis (KAFO) or a newly developed powered KAFO.
Methods: Seven subjects with poliomyelitis who routinely wore conventional KAFOs participated in this study, and received training to enable them to ambulate with the powered KAFO on level ground, prior to gait analysis.
Results: There were no significant differences in the gait symmetry index (SI) of step length (P=0.085), stance time (P=0.082), double limb support time (P=0.929) or speed of walking (p=0.325) between the two test conditions. However, using the new powered KAFO improved the SI in step width (P=0.037), swing time (P=0.014), stance phase percentage (P=0.008) and knee flexion during swing phase (pβ€0.001) compared to wearing the dropped locked KAFO.
Conclusion: The use of a powered KAFO for ambulation by poliomyelitis subjects affects gait symmetry in the base of support, swing time, stance phase percentage and knee flexion during swing phase
Orthostatic Reactivity In Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy
The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of a structured physical therapy (PT) programme on the orthostatic reactivity in patients with diabetic neuropathy (DNP).
The study was performed in 90 patients with DNP (34 male and 56 female, mean age 60.8Β±7.8 years) of lower extremities. The orthostatic autoregulation was evaluated using an active orthostatic test. The arterial blood pressure and the heart rate were determined after 10 minutes of rest in lying position before and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of active standing. All patients had therapy with alpha-lipoic acid and a structured intensive 10 days PT program, later continued as a home exercise programme. The orthostatic autoregulation was evaluated three times β at the start of the study, at day 10 and at 6 weeks after the beginning of PT. The classification of Thulesius was used to divide the patients into 3 groups according to the type of their orthostatic reactivity.
At the start of the study a normotonic orthostatic reactivity (NOR) was observed in 32 patients. Abnormal sympathicotonic type of orthostatic reactivity (SOR) was found in 18 patients and asympaticotonic type of orthostatic reactivity (AOR) was established in the remaining 40 patients. After the PT treatment a significant improvement of the orthostatic autoregulation in the groups with SOR and AOR was found β NOR was observed in 66 patients with DNP (80.3%) at 6 weeks after the start of PT.
The applied structured PT, later continued as a home exercise programme, significantly improved the orthostatic reactivity in patients with orthostatic dysregulation due to DNP.
Author Keywords: Exercise Therapy, Orthostatic Tolerance, Physical Therapy, Type II Diabete
ΠΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈ Π½Π° Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»Ρ
ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠΎ ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π° Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ° Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ. Π’ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π΄Π° ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈ Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΌ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π° Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π°, ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ, ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ½Π° ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠ° ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π½Π° Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡΠ° Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠ° Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½Π° ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°. ΠΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ° ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π° ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΊΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡΠ° Π·Π° Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ½Π° ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ° Π½Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»Π½Π° Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π±Π½Π°, ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π° ΠΈ Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ½Π° Π΄Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ.
Π£ΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΈΠΊΡΡ Π΅ ΡΡΠ·Π΄Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π·Π° ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π°, ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅Π·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈ, ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ°, ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Π½ΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈ, Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎ Π·Π°Π΄ΡΠ»ΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° ΡΠ° Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ βΠΠ΅ΡΠ²Π½ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠΈβ ΠΈ βΠΠΈΠ½Π΅Π·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠΈβ. ΠΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ±Π²Π° Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΈ Π·Π°Π΄ΡΠ»ΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΌ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎ βΠΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠ²ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡβ (ΠΠΠΠ). Π’ΠΎ Π΅ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΌ Π²ΡΡΠΊΠ° Π³Π»Π°Π²Π° Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°.
Π ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ½Π° Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ Π΅ Π±ΠΎΠ³Π°ΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ½Π°Π³Π»Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΈΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±Π»ΠΈΡΠΈ. Π Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ° ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π·Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡΠΈ Π·Π° Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ Ρ ΡΡΡ
Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΠ΅ΡΠΎ Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ°Π³Π°Π»ΠΎ Π² Π΅ΠΆΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ½Π° ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ°.
Π£ΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΈΠΊΡΡ Π·Π°Π²ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π΅Π΄ Π½Π° ΠΠΎΠ±Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π°Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡΠ° Π½Π° Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΊΠΎΠΈΡΠΎ ΡΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π° Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°ΡΠ° Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ
- β¦