3 research outputs found
Survival as a clinical outcome and its spiritual significance in a cohort of patients with advanced central pelvic neoplastic disease undergoing total pelvic evisceration: a poorly debated issue
Background Patients with either treatment-resistant or relapsing advanced central pelvic neoplastic disease present with a condition responsible for debilitating symptoms and consequently poor quality of life (QoL). For these patients, therapeutic strategies are very limited and total pelvic evisceration is the only option for relieving the symptoms and increasing survival. Of note, taking charge of these patients cannot be limited to increasing their lifespan but must also be aimed at improving the clinical, psychological, and spiritual conditions. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the improvement in survival and QoL, focusing on spiritual wellbeing (SWB), in patients with poor life expectancy who underwent total pelvic evisceration for advanced gynecological cancers at our center. Patients and methodsThe QoL and SWB were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), EORTC QLQ-SWB32, and SWB scale, which were repeatedly administered: 30 days before surgery, 7 days after the procedure, 1 and 3 months after surgery, and then every 3 months until death or the last follow-up assessment. Operative outcomes (blood loss, operative time, hospitalization, and incidence of complications) were evaluated as secondary endpoints. The patients and their families were included in a dedicated psycho-oncological and spiritual support protocol, which was managed by specifically trained and specialized personnel who accompanied them during all phases of the study. ResultsA total of 20 consecutive patients from 2017 to 2022 were included in this study. Of these patients, 7 underwent total pelvic evisceration by laparotomy and 13 underwent laparoscopy. The median survival was 24 months (range: 1-61 months). After a median follow-up of 24 months, 16 (80%) and 10 patients (50%) were alive at 1 year and 2 years after surgery, respectively. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 scores significantly improved yet at 7 days and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, as compared with the preoperative values. In particular, an early improvement in pain, overall QoL, and physical and emotional functions was observed. With respect to the SWB, the global SWB item score of the EORTC QLQ-SWB32 questionnaire significantly increased after 1 month and 3 months, as compared with preoperative values (p = 0.0153 and p = 0.0018, respectively), and remained stable thereafter. The mean SWB scale score was 53.3, with a sense of low overall SWB in 10 patients, a sense of moderate SWB in eight patients, and a sense of high SWB in two patients. The SWB scale score significantly increased after 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months, as compared with the preoperative value (p = 0202, p = 0.0171, and p = 0.0255, respectively), and remained stable thereafter. ConclusionTotal pelvic evisceration is a valid approach for improving both survival and QoL in selected patients with advanced pelvic neoplasms and poor life expectancy. Our results particularly underline the importance of accompanying the patients and their families during the journey with dedicated psychological and spiritual support protocols
The role of risk communication in radon mapping, risk assessment and mitigation activities in Sardinia (Italy)
Abstract. In 2014, the Sardinian Regional Department of Hygiene, Health and Social
Security promoted the Regional Prevention Plan, which embraced the
protection of the population from exposure to indoor pollutants, including
radon gas. The programme foresaw: the drafting of "Guidance for the
construction/renovation of buildings"; radon monitoring and mapping
activities during a dedicated campaign based on geological surveying; a
radon health impact assessment; community involvement and a radon risks
communication campaign. The objectives of the programme were focused to
protect Sardinian population from radon risk, with special reference to
vulnerable and susceptible subjects, spread knowledge about risks and the
opportunities to reduce them. Using a Health Impact Assessment procedure,
the number of attributable deaths was estimated based on radon exposure
levels, also visible as preventable events by implementing preventive
actions. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the activities carried
out, with specific reference to the use of communication to develop each
action, to understand strengths and weaknesses and the lessons to be applied
in Sardinia and other areas. Monitoring and evaluation results indicate that the health of populations
living in radon-exposed areas can be significantly improved by reducing
exposure to radon and synergistic risk factors. It is essential to
strengthen awareness-raising events using historical and acquired knowledge,
and to monitor progress in order to reinforce further actions, as these
schemes should be planned for the long term, with central coordination and
continuous evaluation. The case of radon risk management and communication in Sardinia offers a
number of suggestions and lessons learned, both for the continuation of the
work that is expected to be very intense in the coming years, and for the
problems that may arise in other regions and countries affected by radon
risk
Deaths in SARS-Cov-2 Positive Patients in Italy: The Influence of Underlying Health Conditions on Lethality
This study aims to underline the clinical characteristics of patients who died after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in one region of Italian and to evaluate the influence of underlying health conditions on the fatal outcome. A matched case-control study was designed by analyzing the data regarding positive subjects observed up to April 21, 2020. The case fatality rate was 7.9%, with a higher proportion of deaths in men than women. The specific standardized mortality ratio was 0.15—0.13 for males and 0.2 for females, showing that mortality is much lower than expected. Cardiovascular diseases, chronic lung diseases and diabetes mellitus showed a significant association with the outcome. Although the case fatality rate in Sardinia in regard to age and gender patterns seems to be similar to that for Italy as a whole, its quantitative value was far lower than the national one and possible explanations might include the genetic characteristics of the Sardinian population or the immediate closure of its borders as soon as the epidemic started. Our results highlighted that lethality is strongly dependent on the presence of multiple concomitant serious diseases. It is important to have epidemiological strategies for effective guidance on public health actions in order to improve chances of survival