Neurosurgical emergency management during the lockdown period in health care regions in Spain with different COVID-19 impact: lessons learned to improve outcomes on the future waves

Background COVID-19 has overloaded health care systems, testing the capacity and response in every European region. Concerns were raised regarding the impact of resources’ reorganization on certain emergency pathology management. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of the outbreak (in terms of reduction of neurosurgical emergencies) during lockdown in different regions of Spain. Methods We analyzed the impact of the outbreak in four different affected regions by descriptive statistics and univariate comparison with same period of two previous years. These regions differed in their incidence level (high/low) and in the time of excess mortality with respect to lockdown declaration. That allowed us to analyze their influence on the characteristics of neurosurgical emergencies registered for every region. Results 1185 patients from 18 neurosurgical centers were included. Neurosurgical emergencies that underwent surgery dropped 24.41% and 28.15% in 2020 when compared with 2019 and 2018, respectively. A higher reduction was reported for the most affected regions by COVID-19. Non-traumatic spine experienced the most significant decrease in number of cases. Life-threatening conditions did not suffer a reduction in any health care region. Conclusions COVID-19 affected dramatically the neurosurgical emergency management. The most significant reduction in neurosurgical emergencies occurred on those regions that were hit unexpectedly by the pandemic, as resources were focused on fighting the virus. As a consequence, life-threating and non-life-threatening conditions’ mortality raised. Results in regions who had time to prepare for the hit were congruent with an organized and sensible neurosurgical decision-making.Peer reviewe

Ultrasound-Oriented Surgical Planning ("UOSP") for Intracranial Lesions: A Systematic Integration to the Standard Preoperative Planning

Objective: Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) is a well-established technique whose aim is to provide real-time visualization of deep lesions during brain surgery. The lack of definition of anatomic semeiotics and the unusual direction of the insonation plane make interpretation and orientation challenging for the surgeon who newly approaches to such a tool. We propose a novel protocol to be applied during the surgical planning for intracranial lesions surgery, a so-called ultrasound-oriented surgical planning ("UOSP") protocol, and we provide a retrospective analysis of 21 patients who underwent surgery for an intracranial lesion in which UOSP was applied. To further enlighten different surgical orientation strategies and possible limitations given by the technique, we discuss 3 illustrative cases assigned to 3 categories ("basic," "intermediate," and "challenging" lesions) with progressively growing difficulty in anatomic orientation during a surgical procedure. Methods: A total of 21 patients operated between March 2021 and July 2021 and where the UOSP protocol was applied during surgical planning were evaluated retrospectively. The UOSP protocol was performed the days before the surgical intervention by the same surgical team. Results: The UOSP protocol was successfully applied in all 21 patients. In all cases, the preoperative imaging obtained during surgical planning corresponded to the images observed during the application of iUS. Conclusions: The introduction of the UOSP protocol during the planification of the surgical intervention for an intracerebral lesion may serve as a key factor to overcome the actual limitations inherent to the iUS technique. Utilization of this protocol may facilitate wider use of iUS in neurosurgery

The Prognostic-Based Approach in Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNET): Tertiary Reference Center, Single Senior Surgeon, and Long-Term Follow-Up

Postoperative deserved outcomes in acromegalic patients are to normalize serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), reduce the tumoral mass effect, improve systemic comorbidities, and reverse metabolic alterations. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET) are characterized to present a heterogeneous behavior, and growth hormone (GH)-secreting PitNET is not an exception. Promptly determining which patients are affected by more aggressive tumors is essential to guide the optimal postoperative decision-making process [prognostic-based approach]. From 2006 to 2019, 394 patients affected by PitNET were intervened via endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach by the same senior surgeon. A total of 44 patients that met the criteria to be diagnosed as acromegalic and were followed up at least for 24 months (median of 66 months (26–156) were included in the present study. Multiple predictive variables [age, gender, preoperative GH and IGF-1 levels, maximal tumor diameter, Hardy’s and Knosp’s grade, MRI. T2-weighted tumor intensity, cytokeratin expression pattern, and clinicopathological classification] were evaluated through uni- and multivariate statistical analysis. Sparse probability of long-term remission was related to younger age, higher preoperative GH and- or IGF-1, group 2b of the clinicopathological classification, and sparsely granulated cytokeratin expression pattern. Augmented recurrence risk was related to elevated preoperative GH levels, tumor MRI T2-weighted hyperintensity, and sparsely granulated cytokeratin expression pattern. Finally, elevated risk for reintervention was related to group 2b of the clinicopathological classification, Knosp’s grade IV, and tumor MRI T2-weighted hyperintensity. In this study, the authors determined younger age, higher preoperative GH and- or IGF-1 levels, group 2b of the clinicopathological classification, Knosp’s grade IV, MRI T2-weighted tumor hyperintensity and sparsely granulated cytokeratin expression pattern are related to worse postoperative outcomes in long-term follow-up patients affected with GH-secreting PitNET

The ghost tumour revisited. Corticosteroids in primary central nervous system lymphoma: diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications

The cytolytic effect of corticosteroids on primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has established the clinical dogma of avoiding steroid therapy prior to surgery for diagnostic purposes. However, since steroids are very useful during the initial management of intracranial lesions with vasogenic oedema, it was our aim to determine whether they cause a drawback in the diagnosis and prognosis of PCNSL. A retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with PCNSL between 2000 and 2020 in our tertiary neurosurgical centre. Data on steroid administration, surgery type and complications, haematopathological findings and prognostic factors were compiled. A second cohort was used as a control group to compare the ratio of non-diagnostic biopsies; this series comprised patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsy for any reason between 2019 and 2020. Forty patients with PCNSL were included in the study, of which 28 (70%) had received steroids before surgery. The use of steroids was more prevalent in patients with poorer performance status at diagnosis. No relevant differences were found in the diagnostic accuracy regardless of steroid exposure (93% under steroids vs 100% without steroids) or type of surgery performed. Furthermore, steroid withdrawal did not seem to augment the diagnostic ratio. The notable diagnostic delay was not influenced by the use of steroids. Novel imaging and surgical techniques might obviate the need to withhold corticosteroids from patients suffering from PCNSL prior to biopsy. Moreover, when steroids have been given, tapering them and delaying the surgery might not be justified. This could hold relevant therapeutic implications in the early clinical stages.</p