Mutations in HNF1A Result in Marked Alterations of Plasma Glycan Profile

A recent genome-wide association study identified hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-α (HNF1A) as a key regulator of fucosylation. We hypothesized that loss-of-function HNF1A mutations causal for maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) would display altered fucosylation of N-linked glycans on plasma proteins and that glycan biomarkers could improve the efficiency of a diagnosis of HNF1A-MODY. In a pilot comparison of 33 subjects with HNF1A-MODY and 41 subjects with type 2 diabetes, 15 of 29 glycan measurements differed between the two groups. The DG9-glycan index, which is the ratio of fucosylated to nonfucosylated triantennary glycans, provided optimum discrimination in the pilot study and was examined further among additional subjects with HNF1A-MODY (n = 188), glucokinase (GCK)-MODY (n = 118), hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-α (HNF4A)-MODY (n = 40), type 1 diabetes (n = 98), type 2 diabetes (n = 167), and nondiabetic controls (n = 98). The DG9-glycan index was markedly lower in HNF1A-MODY than in controls or other diabetes subtypes, offered good discrimination between HNF1A-MODY and both type 1 and type 2 diabetes (C statistic ≥ 0.90), and enabled us to detect three previously undetected HNF1A mutations in patients with diabetes. In conclusion, glycan profiles are altered substantially in HNF1A-MODY, and the DG9-glycan index has potential clinical value as a diagnostic biomarker of HNF1A dysfunction

Differential regulation of serum microRNA expression by HNF1β and HNF1α transcription factors.

We aimed to identify microRNAs (miRNAs) under transcriptional control of the HNF1β transcription factor, and investigate whether its effect manifests in serum.This article is freely available via Open Access. Click on the 'Additional Link' above to access the full-text via the publisher's site.Published (Open Access

Treatment of pituitary tumors: history.

Over the past century our understanding of the pituitary disease has undergone an amazing evolution, accompanied by impressive advances in the therapeutic approaches to pituitary tumors. This historical review aims to provide insights into the contributions of key medical and scientific pioneers, their occasionally serendipitous discoveries, and the lively global debates, which have ultimately improved the therapeutic targets and the long-term outcome of these patients. The development of the three main modalities is discussed (surgery, irradiation, pharmacotherapy). More recent experimental data, which may provide a path to a stronger therapeutic armamentarium for these undoubtedly challenging tumors, are also briefly reported

Atypical phenotype associated with reported GCK exon 10 deletions: Clinical judgement is needed alongside appropriate genetic investigations.

BACKGROUND: Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) caused by heterozygous mutations in the glucokinase (GCK) gene typically presents with lifelong, stable, mild fasting hyperglycaemia. With the exception of pregnancy, patients with GCK-MODY usually do not require pharmacological therapy. We report two unrelated patients whose initial genetic test results indicated a deletion of GCK exon 10, but whose clinical phenotypes were not typical of GCK-MODY. CASE REPORTS: In case 1, the patient was hyperglycaemic at diagnosis (glucose > 30 mmol/l) and elevated glucose levels > 10 mmol/l persisted after withdrawal of insulin therapy. The patient in case 2 was also hyperglycaemic at diagnosis [HbA1c > 86 mmol/mol (10%)], which improved with the introduction of oral hypoglycaemic agents. These clinical features were not consistent with GCK-MODY. Both patients had a single nucleotide variant that prevented multiplex ligation-dependent probe analysis, which generated a false positive result of a GCK exon 10 deletion. CONCLUSION: False positive genetic results in these two unrelated cases were attributable to the presence of a rare single nucleotide variant that prevented ligation of the probe in the multiplex ligation-dependent probe analysis kit used and falsely indicated deletion of exon 10 within GCK. Both cases had clinical features that did not tally with the typical GCK-MODY phenotype. These cases emphasize the need to interpret the results of definitive genetic tests within the specific clinical context. Increased medical sequencing is likely to lead to more reports of novel mutations of uncertain significance. If genetic investigations do not agree with the clinical picture, clinicians should exercise caution when making therapeutic changes based on these results