Evaluación de la hipertensión arterial resistente por monitoreo residencial de la presión arterial

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is considered the gold standard for the diagnostic confirmation of resistant hypertension (RH). However, home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) has been considered an option, because of its lower cost and greater comfort. OBJECTIVE: To compare the values obtained by HBPM with those obtained by ABPM in the identification of patients with resistant hypertension. METHODS: A total of 51 consecutive patients with resistant hypertension were selected. All were adults of both genders and were undergoing treatment in an outpatient referral clinic from January 2007 to September 2009. Casual office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ABPM, and HBPM were performed according to current guidelines, with a maximum two-week interval between the methods. RESULTS: The comparison of ABPM (mean daytime) with HBPM showed a good correlation between them, both for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and for diastolic blood pressure (DBP): SBP r = 0.70, CI = 0.51-0.82, DBP r = 0.69, CI = 0.52-0.81. RH was confirmed by ABPM in 33 patients and by HBPM in 37, with no significant difference between the methods. CONCLUSION: According to the results obtained, we conclude that HBPM is a method that can be used as an alternative to ABPM for the diagnostic confirmation of RH.FUNDAMENTO: El monitoreo ambulatorio de la presión arterial (MAPA) es considerado el gold standard para la confirmación diagnóstica de la hipertensión arterial resistente (HAR). Mientras tanto, el monitoreo residencial de la presión arterial (MRPA) ha sido considerado una opción, por su costo menor y mayor confort. OBJETIVO: Comparar los valores obtenidos por la MRPA con los obtenidos por la MAPA en la identificación de pacientes hipertensos resistentes. MÉTODOS: Fueron seleccionados consecutivamente 51 pacientes hipertensos resistentes, adultos de ambos sexos, en tratamiento ambulatorio de referencia, de ene/2007-set/2009. La medida de la presión arterial (PA) casual de consultorio, MAPA de 24 horas y MRPA fueron realizadas según las directrices vigentes, con intervalo máximo de dos semanas entre los métodos. RESULTADOS: Al comparar la MAPA (media de vigilia) y MRPA, fue obtenida buena correlación entre ambas, tanto para la presión arterial sistólica (PAS) como para la diastólica (PAD): PAS r = 0,70, IC = 0,51-0,82; PAD r = 0,69, IC = 0,52-0,81. La HAR fue confirmada por la MAPA en 33 pacientes y por la MRPA en 37 de esos, no habiendo diferencia significativa entre los dos métodos. CONCLUSIÓN: De acuerdo con los resultados obtenidos, se concluye que la MRPA es un examen que puede ser utilizado como alternativa a la MAPA para la confirmación diagnóstica de la HAR.FUNDAMENTO: A monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial (MAPA) é considerada o padrão-ouro para a confirmação diagnóstica da hipertensão arterial resistente (HAR). No entanto, a monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA) tem sido considerada uma opção, pelo seu custo menor e maior conforto. OBJETIVO: Comparar os valores obtidos pela MRPA com os obtidos pela MAPA na identificação de pacientes hipertensos resistentes. MÉTODOS: Foram selecionados consecutivamente 51 pacientes hipertensos resistentes, adultos de ambos os sexos, em tratamento ambulatorial de referência, de jan/2007 a set/2009. A medida da pressão arterial (PA) casual de consultório, MAPA de 24 horas e MRPA foram realizadas conforme as diretrizes vigentes, com intervalo máximo de duas semanas entre os métodos. RESULTADOS: Ao comparar a MAPA (média de vigília) e MRPA, foi obtida boa correlação entre ambas, tanto para a pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) quanto para a diastólica (PAD): PAS r = 0,70, IC = 0,51-0,82; PAD r = 0,69, IC = 0,52-0,81. A HAR foi confirmada pela MAPA em 33 pacientes e pela MRPA em 37 desses, não havendo diferença significante entre os dois métodos. CONCLUSÃO: De acordo com os resultados obtidos, conclui-se que a MRPA é um exame que pode ser utilizado como alternativa à MAPA para a confirmação diagnóstica da HAR.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de MedicinaUNIFESP, EPMSciEL

Is there a need to redo many of the diagnoses of hypertension?

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Most hypertensive subjects undergoing treatment were diagnosed solely through measurements made in the consultation office. The objective of this study was to redo the diagnosis of treated patients after new clinical measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study conducted in an outpatient specialty clinic. METHODS: Patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension or undergoing anti-hypertensive treatment, without target organ damage or diabetes, were included. After drug withdrawal lasting 2-3 weeks, new blood pressure (BP) measurements were made during two separate visits. ABPM was performed blindly, in relation to clinical measurements. The BP thresholds used for diagnosing hypertension, white-coat hypertension, normotension and masked hypertension were: 140 (systolic) and 90 (diastolic) mmHg for office measurements and 135 (systolic) and 85 (diastolic) mmHg for mean awake ABPM (MAA). RESULTS: Evaluations were done on 101 subjects (70% women); mean age 51 ± 10 years. The clinical BP was 155 ± 18/97 ± 10 mmHg (first visit) and 150 ± 16/94 ± 11 mmHg (second visit); MAA was 137 ± 13/ 86 ± 10 mmHg. Sixty-four patients (63%) were confirmed as hypertensive, 28 (28%) as white-coat hypertensive, nine (9%) as normotensive and none as masked hypertensive. After ABPM, 37% of the presumed hypertensive patients did not fit into this category. CONCLUSION: This study showed that hypertension was overdiagnosed among hypertensive subjects undergoing treatment. New diagnostic procedures should be performed after drug withdrawal, with the aid of BP monitoring

Teste de respiração lenta aumenta a suspeita da hipertensão do avental branco no consultório Slow breathing test increases the suspicion of white-coat hypertension in the office

FUNDAMENTO: Seria útil dispor de um teste clínico que aumentasse a suspeita da hipertensão do avental branco (HAB) durante a consulta. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o teste de respiração lenta (TRL) na diferenciação entre hipertensão e HAB. MÉTODOS: Cento e um pacientes hipertensos selecionados em triagem tiveram a medicação suspensa por duas a três semanas. A pressão arterial (PA) foi medida antes e depois do TRL em duas visitas. O teste consistiu em respirar por 1 minuto na freqüência de um ciclo respiratório a cada 10 segundos. Dois critérios diagnósticos foram comparados: 1- queda da PA diastólica >10% em pelo menos uma consulta, ou 2- queda da PA para níveis normais (<140/90 mmHg) em pelo menos uma consulta. A MAPA foi realizada de forma cega às medidas clínicas. RESULTADOS: Setenta e uma mulheres e 30 homens, idade média 51+10 anos, média pré e pós-teste de 152+17/ 99+11 e 140+18/ 91+11 mmHg. Nove pacientes tiveram medidas clínicas e ambulatoriais normais. De 92 pacientes, 28 (30%) foram classificados como HAB; 15 tiveram teste positivo para o critério 1, e 21 para o critério 2. Entre 64 (70%) hipertensos, 14 testaram positivo para o critério 1, e 12 para o critério 2. Sensibilidade e especificidade (95% IC): 0,54 (0,36-0,71) e 0,78 (0,67-0,87) critério 1; 0,75 (0,57-0,87) e 0,81 (0,70-0,89) critério 2. CONCLUSÃO: O TRL mostrou aumento da suspeita clínica de HAB em duas consultas ao utilizar o critério de normalização da PA. Isso sugere que esse teste pode auxiliar na otimização dos pedidos de MAPA para casos suspeitos.<br>BACKGROUND: It would be useful to have a clinical test that increases the suspicion of white coat hypertension (WCH) during the medical consultation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Slow Breathing Test (SBT) when differentiating hypertension from WCH. METHODS: 101 hypertensive patients selected at triage had their medication withdrawn for 2-3 weeks. The blood pressure (BP) was measured before and after the SBT at two consultations at the office. The test consisted in breathing for 1 minute at the frequency of one respiratory cycle every 10 seconds. Two diagnostic criteria were compared: 1 - decrease in diastolic BP >10% in at least one visit or 2- decrease in BP to normal levels (<140/90 mm Hg) in at least one visit. The ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed while blinded to the clinical measurements. RESULTS: 71 women and 30 men, with a mean age of 51+10 years, with mean pre and post-test BP of 152+17/ 99+11 and 140+18/ 91+11 mm Hg were assessed. Nine patients had normal clinical and ambulatory measurements. Of the 92 patients, 28 (30%) were classified as having WCH; 15 had a positive test for Criterion 1 and 21 for the Criterion 2. Among 64 (70%) hypertensive individuals, 14 tested positive for Criterion 1 and 12 for Criterion 2. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI): 0.54 (0.36-0.71) and 0.78 (0.67-0.87) for Criterion 1; 0.75 (0.57-0.87) and 0.81 (0.70-0.89) for Criterion 2. CONCLUSION: The SBT showed an increase in the clinical suspicion of WCH in two visits when using the BP normalization criterion. This finding suggests that the test can help in the optimization of ABPM requests for suspected cases