Detectability of motions in AAA with ECG-gated CTA: A quantitative study

Purpose: ECG-gated CT enables the visualization of motions caused by the beating of the heart. Although ECG gating is frequently used in cardiac CT imaging, this technique is also very promising for evaluating vessel wall motion of the aortic artery and the motions of (stent grafts inside) abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Late stent graft failure is a serious complication in endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms. Better understanding of the motion characteristics of stent grafts will be beneficial for designing future devices. In addition, these data can be valuable in predicting stent graft failure in patients. To be able to reliably quantify the motion, however, it is of importance to know the performance and limitations of ECG gating, especially when the motions are small, as is the case in AAA. Since the details of the reconstruction algorithms are proprietary information on the CT manufacturers and not in the public domain, empirical experiments are required. The goal of this study is to investigate as to what extent the motions in AAA can be measured using ECG-gated CT. The authors quantitatively investigate four aspects of motion in ECG-gated CT: The detectability of the motion of objects at different amplitudes and different periodic motions, the temporal resolution, and the volume gaps that occur as a function of heart rate.\ud \ud Methods: They designed an experiment on a standard static phantom to empirically determine temporal resolution. To investigate motion amplitude and frequency, as well as patient heart rate, they designed dynamic experiments in which a home-made phantom driven by a motion unit moves in a predetermined pattern.\ud \ud Results: The duration of each ECG-gated phase was found to be 185 ms, which corresponds to half of the rotation time and is thus in accordance with half scan reconstruction applied by the scanner. By using subpixel localization, motions become detectable from amplitudes of as small as 0.4 mm in the x direction and 0.7 mm in the z direction. With the rotation time used in this study, motions up to 2.7 Hz can be reliably detected. The reconstruction algorithm fills volume gaps with noisy data using interpolation, but objects within these gaps remain hidden.\ud \ud Conclusions: This study gives insight into the possibilities and limitations for measuring small motions using ECG-gated CT. Application of the experimental method is not restricted to the CT scanner of a single manufacturer. From the results, they conclude that ECG-gated CTA is a suitable technique for studying the expected motions of the stent graft and vessel wall in AAA.\u

Aortic root dimension changes during systole and diastole: evaluation with ECG-gated multidetector row computed tomography

Cardiac pulsatility and aortic compliance may result in aortic area and diameter changes throughout the cardiac cycle in the entire aorta. Until this moment these dynamic changes could never be established in the aortic root (aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva and sinotubular junction). The aim of this study was to visualize and characterize the changes in aortic root dimensions during systole and diastole with ECG-gated multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT). MDCT scans of subjects without aortic root disease were analyzed. Retrospectively, ECG-gated reconstructions at each 10% of the cardiac cycle were made and analyzed during systole (30–40%) and diastole (70–75%). Axial planes were reconstructed at three different levels of the aortic root. At each level the maximal and its perpendicular luminal dimension were measured. The mean dimensions of the total study group (n = 108, mean age 56 ± 13 years) do not show any significant difference between systole and diastole. The individual dimensions vary up to 5 mm. However, the differences range between minus 5 mm (diastolic dimension is greater than systolic dimensions) and 5 mm (vice versa). This variability is independent of gender, age, height and weight. This study demonstrated a significant individual dynamic change in the dimensions of the aortic root. These results are highly unpredictable. Most of the healthy subjects have larger systolic dimensions, however, some do have larger diastolic dimensions

Fabric tears as a new cause of type III endoleak with Ancure endograft.

PURPOSE: We present two case reports of type IIIb endoleak. One was due to fabric erosion caused by placement of a stent (Wallstent; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) after endovascular aneurysm repair; the other arose spontaneously. In both cases, an Ancure endograft (Guidant/EVT, Menlo Park, Calif) was placed. CASE REPORTS: In case 1, a large endoleak developed 36 months after uncomplicated endovascular treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. In case 2, endoleak developed 30 months after a complicated procedure. In both cases, two Wallstents were used to treat type I endoleak and limb kinking in the first postoperative months. One type III endoleak was within the endograft at the level of the stents. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, these are the first type III endoleaks reported in association with Ancure endografts. Placement of Wallstents inside endografts is of concern, and another indication for close monitoring during follow-up

Pilot study of dynamic cine CT angiography for the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Implications for endograft treatment

Purpose: To utilize 40-slice electrocardiographically (ECG)-gated cine computed tomographic angiography (CTA) to characterize normal aortic motion during the cardiac cycle at relevant anatomical landmarks in preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients. Methods: In 10 consecutive preoperative AAA patients (10 men; mean age 78.8 years, range 69-86), an ECG-gated CTA dataset was acquired on a 40-slice CT scanner using a standard radiation dose. CTA quality was graded and scan time was measured. Pulsatility measurements at multiple relevant anatomical levels were performed in the axial plane. Changes in aortic circumference were determined for both the aortic wall and the luminal diameter. Results: All 10 CT scans were of good quality. All patients could be scanned in 14 to 33 seconds (mean 21). At each anatomical level measured, there was a 2.2- to 3.4-mm increase in the aortic wall circumference per cardiac cycle. A similar increase was observed in luminal circumference, with a 2.4- to 3.6-mm increase per cycle. Conclusion: This study introduces the concept of dynamic cine CTA imaging of aortic motion, providing insight into the pathophysiology of abdominal aortic and iliac pulsations. Patients with AAAs selected for EVAR demonstrate changes in aortic circumference with each cardiac cycle that may have consequences for endograft sizing and future design. The potential for graft migration, intermittent type I endoleak, and poor patient outcome following EVAR can be anticipated. Complex aortic dynamics deserve increased scrutiny in an effort to prevent potential complications