Quantitative evaluation of CFTR pre-mRNA splicing dependent on the (TG)mTn poly-variant tract

Genetic analysis in cystic fibrosis (CF) is a difficult task. Within the many causes of variability and uncertainty, a major determinant is poor knowledge of the functional effect of most DNA variants of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. In turn, knowledge of the effect of a CFTR variant has dramatic diagnostic, prognostic and, in the era of CF precision medicine, also therapeutic consequences. One of the most challenging CFTR variants is the (TG)mTn haplotype, which has variable functional effect and controversial clinical consequences. The exact quantification of the anomalous splicing of CFTR exon 10 (in the HGVS name; exon 9 in the legacy name) and, consequently, of the residual wild-type functional CFTR mRNA, should be mandatory in clinical assessment of patients with potentially pathological haplotype of this tract. Here, we present a real time-based assay for the quantification of the proportion of exon 10+/exon 10- CFTR mRNA, starting from nasal brushing. Our assay proved rapid, economic and easy to perform. Specific primers used for this assay are either disclosed or commercially available, allowing any laboratory to easily perform it. A simplified analysis of the data is provided, facilitating the interpretation of the results. This method helps to enhance the comprehension of the genotype- phenotype relationship in CF and CFTR-related disorders (CFTR-RD), crucial for the diagnosis, prognosis and personalized therapy of CF

SHIFTING THE PARADIGM IN RADIATION SAFETY

The current radiation safety paradigm using the linear no-threshold (LNT) model is based on the premise that even the smallest amount of radiation may cause mutations increasing the risk of cancer. Autopsy studies have shown that the presence of cancer cells is not a decisive factor in the occurrence of clinical cancer. On the other hand, suppression of immune system more than doubles the cancer risk in organ transplant patients, indicating its key role in keeping occult cancers in check. Low dose radiation (LDR) elevates immune response, and so it may reduce rather than increase the risk of cancer. LNT model pays exclusive attention to DNA damage, which is not a decisive factor, and completely ignores immune system response, which is an important factor, and so is not scientifically justifiable. By not recognizing the importance of the immune system in cancer, and not exploring exercise intervention, the current paradigm may have missed an opportunity to reduce cancer deaths among atomic bomb survivors. Increased antioxidants from LDR may reduce aging-related non-cancer diseases since oxidative damage is implicated in these. A paradigm shift is warranted to reduce further casualties, reduce fear of LDR, and enable investigation of potential beneficial applications of LDR

Severe asthma: One disease and multiple definitions

Introduction: There is, so far, no universal definition of severe asthma. This definition usually relies on: number of exacerbations, inhaled therapy, need for oral corticosteroids, and respiratory function. The use of such parameters varies in the different definitions used. Thus, according to the parameters chosen, each patient may result in having severe asthma or not. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the choice of a specific definition of severe asthma can change the allocation of patients. Methods: Data collected from the Severe Asthma Network Italy (SANI) registry were analyzed. All the patients included were then reclassified according to the definitions of U-BIOPRED, NICE, WHO, ATS/ERS, GINA, ENFUMOSA, and TENOR. Results: 540 patients, were extracted from the SANI database. We observed that 462 (86%) met the ATS/ERS criteria as well as the GINA criteria, 259 (48%) the U-Biopred, 222 (41%) the NICE, 125 (23%) the WHO, 313 (58%) the Enfumosa, and 251 (46%) the TENOR criteria. The mean eosinophil value were similar in the ATS/ERS, U-Biopred, and Enfumosa (528, 532 and 516 cells/mcl), higher in WHO and Tenor (567 and 570 cells/mcl) and much higher in the NICE classification (624 cells/mcl). Lung function tests resulted similarly in all groups, with WHO (67%) and ATS/ERS-GINA (73%), respectively, showing the lower and upper mean FEV1 values. Conclusions: The present observations clearly evidence the heterogeneity in the distribution of patients when different definitions of severe asthma are used. However, the recent definition of severe asthma, provided by the GINA document, is similar to that indicated in 2014 by ATS/ERS, allowing mirror reclassification of the patients examined. This lack of homogeneity could complicate the access to biological therapies. The definition provided by the GINA document, which reflects what suggested by ATS/ERS, could partially overcome the problem