Paper, plastic... or phone?

This article examines mobile-phone payment and banking alternatives in the United States. It explores prospects for growth, available technologies, and the outlook for one or more technologies coming to dominate the market.Payment systems

Contactless: the next payment wave?

This article explores the evolution of contactless payments, whose use will likely increase and could have an important impact on the payments landscape.

Payments fraud : consumer considerations

This article examines the potential for fraud associated with various "traditional" payment methods and the protective measures that consumers should take when using them.Payment systems ; Checks ; Credit cards

Nonbanks in the payments system

Nonbanks have always been a key component of the nation's payments system. In recent years, however, nonbanks have become even more prominent. This heightened visibility raises several questions. In which payments activities are nonbanks engaged? What roles do nonbanks play in specific payments types? What types of risk are potentially associated with nonbank participation? This paper begins to address these questions. Preliminary findings include: (1) Nonbanks are involved in a myriad of activities and roles, both in traditional and emerging payments types; (2) Nonbank business relationships with banks and other participants in the payments systems are often highly complex and interrelated; (3) Nonbanks are rarely directly involved in settlement activities and, hence, appear to be associated with limited settlement and systemic risk; (4) Both nonbanks and banks appear to be increasingly susceptible to operational risk factors. ; Published as a book in 2003.Payment systems ; Nonbank financial institutions ; Nonbank activities

Who's processing your payments?

This article looks at the many roles nonbanks play in payments activities and the oversight questions that arise as a result.

Prospectus, February 7, 1979

VETERANS AT PARKLAND; Student suggests how to resell books; Could Pc King be solution for apathy?; Carry supplies for winter road dangers; Prospectus… It\u27s a start; PBDT appearing at Parkland; Divorce discussed; Womens forum to meet Tues.; Remedy is available; Speakers Bureau sponsored by Parkland Womens Program; Speech synthesizer to be finished soon; PC singers seeking help; Fewer part-time students at PC; Workshop to be at PC Feb. 17; Student Elections; Canteen increases food prices at PC; Two Parkland veterans tell their stories; PC veterans receive answers; PC rockers lead a double life; PC could be underfunded; New group gets mixed reactions; Classifieds; PC Womens Program gives weekly workshops; WPCD\u27s Hit List for the week of Feb. 5; Ag-business seminars; PCD schedules health program; Creative writing class is now PC radio series; Cobras lose two in weekend play; Track win big in Chicago, look toward region meethttps://spark.parkland.edu/prospectus_1979/1027/thumbnail.jp

Unwanted pregnancy, mental health and abortion: untangling the evidence

Abortion policy is still contentious in many parts of the world, and periodically it emerges to dominate health policy debates. This paper examines one such debate in Australia centering on research findings by a New Zealand research group, Fergusson, Horwood & Ridder, published in early 2006. The debate highlighted the difficulty for researchers when their work is released in a heightened political context. We argue that the authors made a logical error in constructing their analysis and interpreting their data, and are therefore not justified in making policy claims for their work. The paper received significant public attention, and may have influenced the public policy position of a major professional body. Deeply held views on all sides of the abortion debate are unlikely to be reconciled, but if policy is to be informed by research, findings must be based on sound science

Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma

Verification of candidate biomarkers relies upon specific, quantitative assays optimized for selective detection of target proteins, and is increasingly viewed as a critical step in the discovery pipeline that bridges unbiased biomarker discovery to preclinical validation. Although individual laboratories have demonstrated that multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) coupled with isotope dilution mass spectrometry can quantify candidate protein biomarkers in plasma, reproducibility and transferability of these assays between laboratories have not been demonstrated. We describe a multilaboratory study to assess reproducibility, recovery, linear dynamic range and limits of detection and quantification of multiplexed, MRM-based assays, conducted by NCI-CPTAC. Using common materials and standardized protocols, we demonstrate that these assays can be highly reproducible within and across laboratories and instrument platforms, and are sensitive to low µg/ml protein concentrations in unfractionated plasma. We provide data and benchmarks against which individual laboratories can compare their performance and evaluate new technologies for biomarker verification in plasma