10 research outputs found
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Metastatic to the Mandible
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common malignancies in the head and neck region, especially
among those of Chinese origin. NPC has multifactorial aetiologies including genetic susceptibility, consumption of
food with high salt content, and the Epstein–Barr virus. The primary tumour usually arises from the lateral walls of the
nasopharynx and is characterized by a rich sub-mucosal lymphatic structure, often leading to cervical lymph node metastasis.
Distant metastasis has been recognized to be a major cause of treatment failure in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Bone, liver and lung are the most frequent sites of NPC metastases
Treatment results for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era: The Hong Kong experience
Purpose: To analyze the treatment results achievable for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era to identify the key failures for future improvement and to provide an updated baseline for future trials. Methods and Results: The results of 2687 consecutive patients treated at all public oncology centers in Hong Kong during 1996-2000 were retrospectively analyzed. The stage distribution (by American Joint Committee on Cancer and International Union Against Cancer staging system, 1997) was 7% Stage I, 41% Stage II, 25% Stage III, and 28% Stage IVA-B. All patients were irradiated with 6-MV photons and the median total dose was 66 Gy. Only 23% of patients had additional treatment with chemotherapy. Results: The 5-year local, nodal, and distant failure-free rates were 85%, 94%, and 81%, respectively; patients with local failure had significantly higher risk of nodal and distant failures. The 5-year progression-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival rates were 63%, 75%, and 80%, respectively. The presenting stage was the most important prognostic factor for all endpoints: with overall survival decreasing from 90% for Stage I to 58% for Stage IVA-B. The results achieved by the 2070 patients treated by radiotherapy alone were almost identical to that of the whole series, the distant failure-free rate among patients with locoregional control was 89% for Stage I-II and 75% for Stage III-IVB. The 860 patients (32%) staged with magnetic resonance imaging achieved significantly better results than those staged by computed tomography, the overall survival being 93% vs. 83% for Stages I-II, and 72% vs. 63% for Stages III-IVB (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Treatment results for nasopharyngeal carcinoma have substantially improved in the modern era; future trials should be based on updated baseline results. Further reduction of distant failure is important for future breakthrough, particularly for patients with advanced disease. © 2005 Elsevier Inc.link_to_subscribed_fulltex
Staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Suggestions for improving the current UICC/AJCC Staging System
Aims: To evaluate the current UICC/AJCC Staging System for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and to search for ways of improving the system. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 2687 consecutive patients treated in five public centres in Hong Kong during the period 1996-2000. All patients were staged by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or both. The prognostic significance of the current stage assignment on various aspects of tumour control was evaluated. Results: T-category, N-category and stage-group were all significant prognostic factors for major end points (P<0.01). However, the distinction of prognosis between Stage I and II was insignificant (5-year cancer-specific survival being 92% vs 95%; P=0.13). Multivariate analyses (corrected for age and sex) revealed lack of significance between T2a and T1 in hazards of local and distant failures, N3a and N2 in distant failure and subgroups of T1-2N0 in cancer-specific deaths. Corresponding down-staging of T2a to T1, N3a to N2, and subgroup T2N0 to stage I, resulted in more even and orderly increase in the hazard ratio of cancer-specific deaths (from 1 for stage I to 1.98 for II, 3.5 for III, 6.08 for IVA and 8.62 for IVB), better hazard consistency among subgroups of the same stage and more balanced stage distribution. Conclusions: The current UICC/AJCC staging System could be further improved by the modifications suggested; validation of the current proposal by external data is urgently awaited. © 2004 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.link_to_subscribed_fulltex
Factors affecting risk of symptomatic temporal lobe necrosis: Significance of fractional dose and treatment time
Purpose: To study the factors affecting the risk of symptomatic temporal lobe necrosis after different fractionation schedules. Methods and Materials: One thousand thirty-two patients with T1-2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radical radiotherapy in Hong Kong during 1990-1995 were studied. They were treated at four different centers with similar techniques but different fractionation schedules: 984 patients were given 1 fraction daily throughout (q.d.), and 48 patients were irradiated twice daily (b.i.d.) for part of the course. The median total dose was 62.5 Gy (range 50.4-71.2), dose per fraction was 2.5 Gy (range 1.6-4.2), and overall treatment time (OTT) was 44 days (range 29-70). In addition, 500 patients received supplementary doses for parapharyngeal extension, 113 received booster doses by brachytherapy, and 114 received sequential chemotherapy using cisplatin-based regimes. Results: Altogether, 24 patients developed symptomatic temporal lobe necrosis: 18 from the q.d. group and 6 from the b.i.d. group. The 5-year actuarial incidence ranged from 0% (after 66 Gy in 33 fractions within 44 days) to 14% (after 71.2 Gy in 40 fractions within 35 days). Multivariate analyses showed that the risk was significantly affected by the fractional effect of the product of total dose and dose per fraction (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.05), OTT (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97), and b.i.d. scheduling (HR 13, 95% CI 3-54). Repeating the analyses for patients treated with the q.d. schedules confirmed the independent significance of OTT in addition to the product of total dose and dose per fraction. Conclusion: The tentative results suggest that in addition to fractional dose, the OTT also had significant impact on the risk of temporal lobe necrosis, and b.i.d. scheduling increased the hazard further. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.link_to_subscribed_fulltex
Dose-response relationship of nasopharyngeal carcinoma above conventional tumoricidal level: A study by the Hong Kong nasopharyngeal carcinoma study group (HKNPCSG)
Background and purpose: To define the dose-response relationship of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) above the conventional tumoricidal dose level of 66 Gy when the basic radiotherapy (RT) course was given by the 2D Ho's technique. Patients and methods: Data from all five regional cancer centers in Hong Kong were pooled for this retrospective study. All patients (n=2426) were treated with curative-intent RT with or without chemotherapy between 1996 and 2000 with the basic RT course using the Ho's technique. The primary endpoint was local control. The prognostic significance of dose-escalation ('boost') after 66 Gy, T-stage, N-stage, use of chemotherapy, sex and age (≤40 years vs >40 years) was studied. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: On multivariate analysis, T-stage (P< 0.01; hazard ratio [HR], 1.58) and optimal boost (P=0.01; HR, 0.34) were the only significant factors affecting local failure for the whole study population, and for the population of patients treated by radiotherapy alone, but not for patients who also received chemotherapy. The following were independent determinants of local failure for patient groups with different T-stages treated by radiotherapy alone: use of a boost in T1/T2a disease (P=0.01; HR, 0.33); use of a boost (P<0.01; HR, 0.60) and age (P=0.01; HR, 1.02) in T3/T4 tumors. Among patients with T2b tumors treated by radiotherapy alone and given a boost, the use of a 20 Gy-boost gave a lower local failure rate than a 10 Gy-boost. There was no apparent excess mortality attributed to RT complications. Conclusions: Within the context of a multi-center retrospective study, dose-escalation above 66 Gy significantly improved local control for T1/T2a and T3/4 tumors when the primary RT course was based on the 2D Ho's technique without additional chemotherapy. 'Boosting' in NPC warrants further investigation. Caution should be taken when boosting is considered because of possible increase in radiation toxicity. © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.link_to_subscribed_fulltex
Bivalent binding of a fully human IgG to the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins reveals mechanisms of potent neutralization
In vitro antibody selection against pathogens from naïve combinatorial libraries can yield various classes of antigen-specific binders that are distinct from those evolved from natural infection 1–4 . Also, rapid neutralizing antibody discovery can be made possible by a strategy that selects for those interfering with pathogen and host interaction 5 . Here we report the discovery of antibodies that neutralize SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, from a highly diverse naïve human Fab library. Lead antibody 5A6 blocks the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the viral spike from binding to the host receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 infection of Vero E6 cells, and reduces viral replication in reconstituted human nasal and bronchial epithelium models. 5A6 has a high occupancy on the viral surface and exerts its neutralization activity via a bivalent binding mode to the tip of two neighbouring RBDs at the ACE2 interaction interface, one in the “up” and the other in the “down” position, explaining its superior neutralization capacity. Furthermore, 5A6 is insensitive to several spike mutations identified in clinical isolates, including the D614G mutant that has become dominant worldwide. Our results suggest that 5A6 could be an effective prophylactic and therapeutic treatment of COVID-19
Second primary cancers in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pooled analysis of 13 cancer registries
10.1007/s10552-006-0101-zCancer Causes and Control183269-278CCCN
