Discrepancies in the diagnosis of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and its management implications: results of a multinational survey

To measure discrepancies in diagnoses and recommendations impacting management of proliferative lesions of the breast, a questionnaire of five problem scenarios was distributed among over 300 practicing pathologists. Of the 230 respondents, 56.5% considered a partial cribriform proliferation within a duct adjacent to unequivocal ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 37.7% of whom recommended reexcision if it were at a resection margin. Of the 43.5% who diagnosed the partially involved duct as DCIS, 28.0% would not recommend reexcision if the lesion were at a margin. When only five ducts had a partial cribriform proliferation, 35.7% considered it as DCIS, while if ≥20 ducts were so involved, this figure rose to 60.4%. When one duct with a complete cribriform pattern measured 0.5, 1.5, or 4 mm, a diagnosis of DCIS was made by 22.6, 31.3, and 94.8%, respectively. When multiple ducts with flat epithelial atypia were at a margin, 20.9% recommended reexcision. Much of these discrepancies arise from the artificial separation of ADH and low-grade DCIS and emphasize the need for combining these two under the umbrella designation of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (DIN 1) to diminish the impact of different terminologies applied to biologically similar lesions

Invasive carcinomas of the male breast: a morphologic study of the distribution of histologic subtypes and metastatic patterns in 778 cases

The current investigation was conducted to evaluate the proportional distribution of the various histologic subtypes (including newly recognized variants) of male breast carcinomas, to determine whether any histologic subtypes occur with a frequency that is markedly discordant with the expected frequencies from published data on parallel female breast tumors. We also aimed to document the distribution of malignancies metastatic to the breast. Seven hundred fifty-nine archived cases of primary invasive carcinoma involving the male breast were retrieved and subcategorized into histologic subtypes according to contemporary criteria. Six hundred forty-three (84.7%) tumors were pure infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) not otherwise specified. The most common of the remainder included papillary carcinoma with invasion in the form of IDC (n = 34), mixed IDC and mucinous carcinoma (n = 26), and pure mucinous carcinoma (n = 21). In 19 cases, metastases from other sites involved the breast, most commonly (58%) cutaneous melanoma. Invasive carcinoma of the male breast appears to display a morphologic spectrum and distribution of histologic subtypes that is comparable to those of the female breast, with some expected variation. Compared with published experience on their female counterparts, there is a two-fold increase in the frequency of invasive papillary carcinoma in the male breast. Finally, the most common tumor metastatic to the male breast in this series was cutaneous melanoma

Apoplectic leiomyomas: does ethnicity make a difference? a clinicopathologic study

Apoplectic leiomyomas-benign uterine leiomyomas with morphologic changes including hemorrhage, hypercellularity, mitotic activity, nuclear atypia, and even necrosis-can be difficult to distinguish from uterine leiomyosarcomas. Apoplectic leiomyomas have been associated with hormonal therapy; however, the relationship between apoplectic leiomyomas, hormones, and ethnicity has not received much attention in the literature. We evaluated the relationship of hormonal therapy and ethnicity in 869 women with uterine leiomyomas, 136 of which qualified as apoplectic leiomyomas.Apoplectic leiomyomas were observed in 23.3% (49/210) of women exposed to hormonal therapy compared to 13.2% (87/659) of women not exposed to hormonal therapy (p \u3c 0.0001). Women taking ethinyl estradiol/norethindrone (Lo-Estrin), leuprolide, and medroxyprogesterone were significantly more likely to have apoplectic leiomyomas compared to women taking other hormonal therapies. Apoplectic leiomyomas were observed in 28.9% (44/152) of African-American women compared to 12.4% (79/639) of Caucasian women (p \u3c 0.0001), and this difference remained statistically significant regardless of hormone use. Apoplectic leiomyomas were observed in 22.1% (77/349) of women ≤ 45 years of age compared to 11.3% (59/520) of women \u3e 45 years of age (p \u3c 0.0001), and this difference remained statistically significant regardless of hormone use.This is the largest study to date examining apoplectic leiomyomas in women on known hormonal therapy compared to women with uterine leiomyomas, but not on hormonal therapy. Information about hormonal therapy, ethnicity, and age can be helpful in the diagnostic interpretation of apoplectic leiomyoma