Retrospective study to evaluate the treatment of digital pulp lesions using a homodigital flap

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the homodigital flap surgical procedure, as well as the function of the finger, pain, sensation, esthetics, and patient satisfaction. Method: Retrospective analysis of records and questionnaires of patients who underwent this surgical technique between the months of May 2013 and October 2016. Eight were included in the study, with an average follow-up period of 23 months. Patients with digital pulp lesions of the thumbs and those who did not perform rehabilitation were excluded. All underwent the two-point discrimination test, the Semmes-Weinstein test, and range of motion evaluation. The age varied from 22 to 59 years (average of 32.9), six (75%) being male patients. Results: Three patients (37.5%) had involvement of the right hand and five of the left (62.5%). Regarding the etiology, seven suffered injury and one a chemical burn. The average distance obtained from the two-point discrimination test was 7.3 mm. All patients who underwent the Semmes-Weinstein test obtained response to the purple filament. The average sum of the range of motion of the affected digit was 98.9%. The flap area was on average 294.4 mm2. The return to work averaged seven weeks. A positive Tinel sign was found in the donating area and two reported intolerance to cold. Partial or total necrosis of the flap was not observed. Conclusion: The homodigital flap technique presented satisfactory esthetics and functional results regarding feasibility, sensation, and digital mobility in pulp lesions

Comparação entre duas órteses de abdução no tratamento do pé torto congênito

Made available in DSpace on 2019-09-11T20:51:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2017RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar e comparar a eficácia entre dois tipos de órtese de abdução para o pé, tipo Denis-Browne (tradicional) e a proposta por Dobbs (dinâmica), quanto à manutenção da correção das deformidades e da prevenção das recidivas. Método: Estudo de casos, retrospectivo e comparativo, com levantamento de prontuários de crianças com PTCI. Foram avaliados 28 pacientes, totalizando 43 pés, divididos em dois grupos: Grupo 1 - tratados com aparelho tradicional, 16 pacientes, 24 PTCI. Grupo 2 - tratados com aparelho dinâmico, 12 pacientes, totalizando 19 PTCI. A análise estatística comparou as variáveis categóricas entre os grupos com o teste ANOVA. Foi adotado nível de significância de 5% (p ≤ 0,05). Resultados: No grupo 1, a recidiva ocorreu em dois pés (8,33%) e no grupo 2 em um pé (5,26%). Na comparação das duas órteses, a eficácia não apresentou diferença significante. Conclusão: Ambos os aparelhos de abdução mostraram-se eficazes na manutenção da correção das deformidades do pé torto congênito. Não ocorreu significância estatística em relação às órteses e a ocorrência de recidivas. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo Retrospectivo Comparativo.ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the effectiveness of two types of abduction orthotics used for the feet, the Denis-Browne type (traditional) and the Dobbs type (dynamic), with regard to maintenance of deformity correction and prevention of recurrence . Method: In this comparative retrospective case study, information was collected from the medical records of children with idiopathic congenital clubfoot (CCF). We evaluated a total of 43 feet in 28 patients, which were divided into two groups. Group 1 was comprised of 16 patients with a total of 24 CCFs treated with the traditional orthotic device. Group 2 consisted of 12 patients with a total of 19 CCFs treated with the dynamic orthotic device. The statistical analysis used the ANOVA test to compare the categorical variables between the groups. A significance level of 5% was adopted (p-value≤0.05) . Results: In Group 1, recurrence was observed in 2 feet (8.33%), and in 1 foot in Group 2 (5.26%). No significant difference in effectiveness was seen between the two types of orthotic devices . Conclusion: Both abduction devices were seen to be effective in maintaining correction of congenital clubfoot deformities. There was no statistical significance between type of orthotic device and recurrence. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.[Gil, Bruno Leite; Torres Filho, Lucio Carlos de Azevedo; Santos, Tarsila Pagnan Silva dos] Hospital Universitário de Taubaté, BrazilLara, Luiz Carlos Ribeiro] Universidade de Taubaté, Brazi

COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO TYPES OF ABDUCTION ORTHOTICS IN TREATING CONGENITAL CLUBFOOT

<div><p>ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the effectiveness of two types of abduction orthotics used for the feet, the Denis-Browne type (traditional) and the Dobbs type (dynamic), with regard to maintenance of deformity correction and prevention of recurrence . Method: In this comparative retrospective case study, information was collected from the medical records of children with idiopathic congenital clubfoot (CCF). We evaluated a total of 43 feet in 28 patients, which were divided into two groups. Group 1 was comprised of 16 patients with a total of 24 CCFs treated with the traditional orthotic device. Group 2 consisted of 12 patients with a total of 19 CCFs treated with the dynamic orthotic device. The statistical analysis used the ANOVA test to compare the categorical variables between the groups. A significance level of 5% was adopted (p-value≤0.05) . Results: In Group 1, recurrence was observed in 2 feet (8.33%), and in 1 foot in Group 2 (5.26%). No significant difference in effectiveness was seen between the two types of orthotic devices . Conclusion: Both abduction devices were seen to be effective in maintaining correction of congenital clubfoot deformities. There was no statistical significance between type of orthotic device and recurrence. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.</p></div