A new era and future of education: the impact of pandemic on online learning – a study from the European School of Urology

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)[Introduction] In contemporary times, the online learning process has become indispensable for healthcare education. In this direction, the European School of Urology (ESU) has taken the challenge to implement new technologies to bring down knowledge barriers. Web-based seminars (webinars) are one of the tools that help us move towards such inclusivity, and in front-facing COVID-19 pandemic, when face-to-face meetings were forbidden.[Material and methods] Data from ESU webinars was collected from 2016 to 2022. We described the trends through years of: a) number of webinars per year; b) number of oncological versus non-oncological webinars per year; c) number of registrations per year; d) attendance rate; e) YouTube visualisations. We also analysed audience demographics and COVID-19 impact.[Results] We found a 60% increase in webinars launched per year with a trend towards more non-oncological webinars. A 94% rise in the number of registrations and an 85% increase in the attendance ratio from 2016 to 2022 was observed. The mean YouTube visualisations per webinar decreased over 200%. Among registrations, we had a 3:1 male: female ratio, 53% were older than 40, and a 51% were of European precedence. COVID-19 positively impacted webinars with a remarkable increase on the amount of webinars launched, number of registrations and attendance ratio.[Conclusions] Webinars are a powerful tool to spread healthcare knowledge, bridging the gap in medical educational access. COVID-19 was a determinant that reinforced its implantation, but our data show that this new learning tool had a positive uptake, and has come to stayPeer reviewe

A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer histology identification and grading

[Background] Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool in pathology, including cancer diagnosis, subtyping, grading, and prognostic prediction.[Methods] The aim of the study is to assess AI application in prostate cancer (PCa) histology. We carried out a systematic literature search in 3 databases. Primary outcome was AI accuracy in differentiating between PCa and benign hyperplasia. Secondary outcomes were AI accuracy in determining Gleason grade and agreement among AI and pathologists.[Results] Our final sample consists of 24 studies conducted from 2007 to 2021. They aggregate data from roughly 8000 cases of prostate biopsy and 458 cases of radical prostatectomy (RP). Sensitivity for PCa diagnostic exceeded 90% and ranged from 87% to 100%, and specificity varied from 68% to 99%. Overall accuracy ranged from 83.7% to 98.3% with AUC reaching 0.99. The meta-analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel method showed pooled sensitivity of 0.96 with I2 = 80.7% and pooled specificity of 0.95 with I2 = 86.1%. Pooled positive likehood ratio was 15.3 with I2 = 87.3% and negative – was 0.04 with I2 = 78.6%. SROC (symmetric receiver operating characteristics) curve represents AUC = 0.99. For grading the accuracy of AI was lower: sensitivity for Gleason grading ranged from 77% to 87%, and specificity from 82% to 90%.[Conclusions] The accuracy of AI for PCa identification and grading is comparable to expert pathologists. This is a promising approach which has several possible clinical applications resulting in expedite and optimize pathology reports. AI introduction into common practice may be limited by difficult and time-consuming convolutional neural network training and tuning.Peer reviewe

Impact of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with thulium fiber laser on the erectile function

Abstract Background The impact of number of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate techniques (holmium laser enucleation - HoLEP for example) on erectile function have already been investigated. However, the thulium-fiber laser, in this setting remains unstudied. In this study, we compared sexual function outcomes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or thulium-fiber laser enucleation (ThuFLEP). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transurethral resection and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate for BPH; inclusion criteria was the presence of infravesical obstruction (IPSS > 20, Qmax < 10 mL/s). Erectile function (EF) was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) both prior to endoscopic examination, and six months after. Results A total of 469 patients with BPH were included in the study; of these, 211 underwent to ThuFLEP, and 258 TURP. Preoperative IIEF-5 in TURP and ThuFLEP groups were 11.7 (±4.5) and 11.1 (±5.0), respectively (p = 0.17). At six month the IIEF-5 score was unchanged (p = 0.26 and p = 0.08) and comparable in both groups (p = 0.49). However, mean IIEF-5 score shown significant increase of 0.72 in ThuFLEP group, comparing to decrease of 0.24 in TURP patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions Both TURP and ThuFLEP are effective modalities in the management of infravesical obstruction due to BPH. At six months follow-up after surgery, both techniques lead to comparable IIEF-5 score. However, our results demonstrated that the ThuFLEP is more likely to preserve the erectile function leading to increase of IIEF-5 at six months in contrast to TURP which lead to slight drop in IIEF-5 score

Detection of Urothelial Bladder Cancer Based on Urine and Tissue Telomerase Activity Measured by Novel RT-TRAP-2PCR Method

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of urine telomerase activity (TA) in detecting bladder cancer (BCa) using the modified Telomeric Repeat Amplification Protocol (TRAP) and the Real Time Telomeric Repeat Amplification Protocol with double Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-TRAP-2PCR). Methods: In this case-control study, matching urine (in the pre- and post-surgical period) and tissue samples from 68 patients with BCa were assessed for TA. As a control, 45 urine samples were examined from non-BCa patients. TA levels were measured using TRAP and RT-TRAP-2 PCR methods. Results: Preoperative urinary TA was elevated in 64 (94.1%) of the 68 BCa patients. Urine TA was undetectable in 44 control patients, while TA was detected in one patient with histologically verified cystitis. Sensitivity for BCa detection of 94.1% and specificity of 97.8% were observed for urinary TA, while tissue TA had 100% sensitivity and 97.8% specificity. Both urine and tissue TA levels were not significantly higher in patients with muscle-invasive disease compared to those with non-muscle invasive BCa (p &gt; 0.05). Urine and tissue TA levels were not associated with higher tumor grade, stage, and number of tumors (p &gt; 0.05). However, the association was found between higher urinary and tissue TA levels with tumor size ≥ 3 cm (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). During the first postoperative year, 17 BCa patients experienced disease recurrence, and urinary TA was present in 14 (82.4%) of these patients. The sensitivity and specificity of urinary TA levels for BCa recurrence in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) during follow-up were 82% and 94.4%, respectively. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates a high diagnostic performance of urinary and tissue TA levels measured by a new RT-TRAP-2PCR method for detecting and monitoring BCa. Additionally, the association was found between higher urinary and tissue TA levels with tumor size ≥ 3 cm; however, higher TA levels failed for significant correlation with advanced tumor stage and grade. Our study could serve as a benchmark for the evaluation of novel biomarkers using the RT-TRAP-2PCR method

A systematic review of cytoreductive prostatectomy outcomes and complications in oligometastatic disease

Objective: To analyze outcomes and complications of cytoreductive prostatectomy (CRP) for oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) in order to elucidate its role in this space. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using three databases (Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science). The primary endpoints were oncologic outcomes. The secondary endpoints were complication rates and functional results. Results: In all studies, overall survival was better or at least comparable variable in the groups with CRP compared to no local treatment. The greatest benefit from CRP in 5-year overall survival in one study was 67.4% for CRP versus 22.5% for no local treatment. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) showed the same trend. Several authors found significant benefits from CSS in the CRP group: from 79% vs. 46% to 100% vs. 61%. CRP was a predictor of better CSS (hazard ratio 0.264, p=0.004). Positive surgical margin rates differed widely from 28.6% to 100.0%. Urinary continence in CRP versus RP for localized PCa was significantly lower (57.4% vs. 90.8%, p<0.0001). Severe incontinence occurred seldom (2.5%–18.6%). Total complication rates after CRP differed widely, from 7.0% to 43.6%. Rates of grades 1 and 2 events prevailed. Patients on ADT alone also showed a considerable number of complications varying from 5.9% to 57.7%. Conclusion: CRP improves medium-term cancer control in patients with oligometastatic PCa. The morbidity and complication rates of this surgery are comparable with other approaches, but postoperative incontinence rate is higher compared with RP for localized disease