Response to responsible research assessment I and II from the perspective of the DGPs working group on open science in clinical psychology

We comment on the papers by Schönbrodt et al. (2022) and Gärtner et al. (2022) on responsible research assessment from the perspective of clinical psychology and psychotherapy research. Schönbrodt et al. (2022) propose four principles to guide hiring and promotion in psychology: (1) In addition to publications in scientific journals, data sets and the development of research software should be considered. (2) Quantitative metrics can be useful, but they should be valid and applied responsibly. (3) Methodological rigor, research impact, and work quantity should be considered as three separate dimensions for evaluating research contributions. (4) The quality of work should be prioritized over the number of citations or the quantity of research output. From the perspective of clinical psychology, we endorse the initiative to update current practice by establishing a matrix for comprehensive, transparent and fair evaluation criteria. In the following, we will both comment on and complement these criteria from a clinical-psychological perspective

Why harmless sensations might hurt in individuals with chronic pain: About heightened prediction and perception of pain in the mind

In individuals with chronic pain harmless bodily sensations can elicit anticipatory fear of pain resulting in maladaptive responses such as taking pain medication. Here, we aim to broaden the perspective taking into account recent evidence that suggests that interoceptive perception is largely a construction of beliefs, which are based on past experience and that are kept in check by the actual state of the body. Taking a Bayesian perspective, we propose that individuals with chronic pain display a heightened prediction of pain (prior probability p(pain)), which results in heightened pain perception (posterior probability p(pain|sensation)) due to an assumed link between pain and a harmless bodily sensation (p(sensation│pain)). This pain perception emerges because their mind infers pain as the most likely cause for the sensation. When confronted with a mismatch between predicted pain and a (harmless bodily) sensation, individuals with chronic pain try to minimize the mismatch most likely by active inference of pain or by an attentional shift. The active inference results in activities that produce a stronger sensation that will match with the prediction, allowing subsequent perceptual inference of pain. Here, we depict heightened pain perception in individuals with chronic pain by reformulating and extending the assumptions of the interoceptive predictive coding model from a Bayesian perspective. The review concludes with a research agenda and clinical considerations

Parental responses to children’s pain : Analysis of the parental responses to their child’s pain in the German general population

Hintergrund: Wenn Kinder Schmerzen haben, reagieren Eltern kognitiv-affektiv und verhaltensbezogen. Dysfunktionale Reaktionen wie elterliches Katastrophisieren können zur Chronifizierung kindlicher Schmerzen beitragen. Ziel der Arbeit: Ziele der Online-Studie sind (1) die erstmalige psychometrische Überprüfung existierender Fragebögen zu kognitiv-affektiven (Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Parents; PCS-P) und verhaltensbezogenen Reaktionen (Inventar zum schmerzbezogenen Elternverhalten; ISEV-E) an 105 schmerzfreien Eltern, (2) der Vergleich der Reaktionen mit existierenden (inter-)nationalen klinischen und schmerzfreien Samples sowie mit 80 Eltern mit selbstberichteten chronischen Schmerzen. Methode: Die teilnehmenden Eltern machten per Online-Fragebogen Angaben zu ihren elterlichen Reaktionen auf kindlichen Schmerz. Ergebnisse: Die Faktoren des ISEV-E konnten nicht bestätigt werden; die Faktorenstruktur des PCS-P war replizierbar. Das elterliche Katastrophisieren der schmerzfreien Eltern war geringer als in klinischen Samples. Unterschiede zwischen schmerzfreien Eltern und Eltern mit selbstberichteten chronischen Schmerzen aus der Allgemeinbevölkerung zeigten sich nicht. Diskussion: Die Ergebnisse bieten eine Basis zur Einordnung des elterlichen Katastrophisierens, um Risikogruppen mit starker Katastrophisierungsneigung frühzeitig zu identifizieren.Background: Parental reactions to their child’s pain can comprise cognitive-affective and behavioral responses. Dysfunctional responses like parental catastrophizing may lead to an aggravation of the child’s pain. Objectives: Aims of the online-based study were (1) to psychometrically evaluate existing questionnaires into cognitive-affective (Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Parents; PCS-P) and behavioral responses (Inventar zum schmerzbezogenen Elternverhalten; ISEV-E) within a sample of 105 healthy parents, and (2) to compare their responses to existing (inter)national clinical samples and to the reactions of 80 parents with self-reported chronic pain from the general population. Methods: The assessment of parental pain-related reactions was online-based. Results: While the factor structure of the ISEV-E could not be replicated, the three factors of the PCS-P could be replicated. Parental catastrophizing of the healthy parents was lower compared to clinical samples. Healthy parents did not differ from parents with chronic pain from the general population. Conclusion: The results offer a basis to grade parental catastrophizing, so that risk-groups can be identified