Antagonism between Weddel and Vatch: Faulkner\u27s "Mountain Victory"

石垣恒教授追悼

アメリカ文学史へのアプローチ : 作品100選

第1章　植民地時代と清教徒の社会……………………1第2章　アメリカの独立と建国の父祖たち……………7第3章　国民文学の成立…………………………………15第4章　アメリカン・ルネッサンス……………………21第5章　4人の代表的詩人たち…………………………29第6章　南北戦争と文学…………………………………39第7章　リアリズム………………………………………45第8章　自然主義…………………………………………53第9章　中西部の作家たち………………………………61第10章　失われた世代の作家たちとモダニズム……67第11章　南部の作家たち………………………………75第12章　1930年代の小説………………………………81第13章　第二次世界大戦後の文学……………………87第14章　ポストモダニズム……………………………95第15章　ユダヤ系作家たち……………………………105第16章　アフロ・アメリカン文学……………………113第17章　女性作家たち…………………………………123第18章　ネイテイヴ・アメリカン文学………………139第19章　アメリカ演劇…………………………………143第20章　現代アメリカ詩………………………………15

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J-SSCG 2016)

Background and purposeThe Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J-SSCG 2016), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in February 2017 and published in the Journal of JSICM, [2017; Volume 24 (supplement 2)] https://doi.org/10.3918/jsicm.24S0001 and Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine [2017; Volume 28, (supplement 1)] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jja2.2017.28.issue-S1/issuetoc.This abridged English edition of the J-SSCG 2016 was produced with permission from the Japanese Association of Acute Medicine and the Japanese Society for Intensive Care Medicine.MethodsMembers of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine were selected and organized into 19 committee members and 52 working group members. The guidelines were prepared in accordance with the Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) creation procedures. The Academic Guidelines Promotion Team was organized to oversee and provide academic support to the respective activities allocated to each Guideline Creation Team. To improve quality assurance and workflow transparency, a mutual peer review system was established, and discussions within each team were open to the public. Public comments were collected once after the initial formulation of a clinical question (CQ) and twice during the review of the final draft. Recommendations were determined to have been adopted after obtaining support from a two-thirds (> 66.6%) majority vote of each of the 19 committee members.ResultsA total of 87 CQs were selected among 19 clinical areas, including pediatric topics and several other important areas not covered in the first edition of the Japanese guidelines (J-SSCG 2012). The approval rate obtained through committee voting, in addition to ratings of the strengths of the recommendation, and its supporting evidence were also added to each recommendation statement. We conducted meta-analyses for 29 CQs. Thirty-seven CQs contained recommendations in the form of an expert consensus due to insufficient evidence. No recommendations were provided for five CQs.ConclusionsBased on the evidence gathered, we were able to formulate Japanese-specific clinical practice guidelines that are tailored to the Japanese context in a highly transparent manner. These guidelines can easily be used not only by specialists, but also by non-specialists, general clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, clinical engineers, and other healthcare professionals