周期写像を用いた高次保存量を持つ可積分方程式の生成

九州大学応用力学研究所研究集会報告 No.21ME-S7 「非線形波動研究の現状と将来 : 次の10 年への展望」RIAM Symposium No.21ME-S7 Current and Future Research on Nonlinear Waves : Perspectives for the Next Decade可積分な２階差分方程式としてQRT系が知られている。これまでに我々は、QRT系をもとに高次保存量を持つ差分方程式を生成してきた[1]。今回、2階可積分差分方程式の中でQRT系ではないと主張されている方程式から得た考察をもとに、新たな可積分な方程式を生成する

Comparison of weighed food record procedures for the reference methods in two validation studies of food frequency questionnaires

Background: Although open-ended dietary assessment methods, such as weighed food records (WFRs), are generally considered to be comparable, differences between procedures may influence outcome when WFRs are conducted independently. In this paper, we assess the procedures of WFRs in two studies to describe their dietary assessment procedures and compare the subsequent outcomes. Methods: WFRs of 12 days (3 days for four seasons) were conducted as reference methods for intake data, in accordance with the study protocol, among a subsample of participants of two large cohort studies. We compared the WFR procedures descriptively. We also compared some dietary intake variables, such as the frequency of foods and dishes and contributing foods, to determine whether there were differences in the portion size distribution and intra- and inter-individual variation in nutrient intakes caused by the difference in procedures. Results: General procedures of the dietary records were conducted in accordance with the National Health and Nutrition Survey and were the same for both studies. Differences were seen in 1) selection of multiple days (non-consecutive days versus consecutive days); and 2) survey sheet recording method (individual versus family participation). However, the foods contributing to intake of energy and selected nutrients, the portion size distribution, and intra- and inter-individual variation in nutrient intakes were similar between the two studies. Conclusion: Our comparison of WFR procedures in two independent studies revealed several differences. Notwithstanding these procedural differences, however, the subsequent outcomes were similar

Clinical responses to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor retreatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients who benefited from prior effective gefitinib therapy: a retrospective analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gefitinib was the first epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Few treatment options are available for NSCLC patients who have responded to gefitinib treatment and demonstrated tumor progression. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the 2^ndEGFR-TKI administration.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients who had obtained a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) with gefitinib treatment and were re-treated with EGFR-TKI after failure of the initial gefitinib treatment.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Three patients (27%) were treated with gefitinib as the 2^ndEGFR-TKI, and 8 patients (73%) received erlotinib. Only one patient (9%) showed PR, 7 (64%) achieved SD, and 3 (27%) had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 73% (95% CI, 43% - 91%) and the median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2 - 5.2). The median overall survival from the beginning of the 2^ndEGFR-TKI and from diagnosis were 7.3 months (95% CI, 2.7 - 13) and 36.7 months (95% CI, 23.6 - 43.9), respectively. No statistical differences in PFS or OS were observed between gefitinib and erlotinib as the 2^ndEGFR-TKI (PFS, P = 0.23 and OS, P = 0.052). The toxicities associated with the 2^ndEGFR-TKI were generally acceptable and comparable to those observed for the initial gefitinib therapy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results indicate that a 2^ndEGFR-TKI treatment can be an effective treatment option for gefitinib responders.</p

Clinical responses to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor retreatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients who benefited from prior effective gefitinib therapy: a retrospective analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gefitinib was the first epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Few treatment options are available for NSCLC patients who have responded to gefitinib treatment and demonstrated tumor progression. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the 2^ndEGFR-TKI administration.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients who had obtained a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) with gefitinib treatment and were re-treated with EGFR-TKI after failure of the initial gefitinib treatment.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Three patients (27%) were treated with gefitinib as the 2^ndEGFR-TKI, and 8 patients (73%) received erlotinib. Only one patient (9%) showed PR, 7 (64%) achieved SD, and 3 (27%) had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 73% (95% CI, 43% - 91%) and the median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2 - 5.2). The median overall survival from the beginning of the 2^ndEGFR-TKI and from diagnosis were 7.3 months (95% CI, 2.7 - 13) and 36.7 months (95% CI, 23.6 - 43.9), respectively. No statistical differences in PFS or OS were observed between gefitinib and erlotinib as the 2^ndEGFR-TKI (PFS, P = 0.23 and OS, P = 0.052). The toxicities associated with the 2^ndEGFR-TKI were generally acceptable and comparable to those observed for the initial gefitinib therapy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results indicate that a 2^ndEGFR-TKI treatment can be an effective treatment option for gefitinib responders.</p