Does pregnancy affect the metabolic equivalent at rest and during low intensity exercise?

Background: One metabolic equivalent (MET) is the amount of oxygen consumed while sitting at rest and is equal to 3.5 ml O2·kg-1·min-1. METs are often used to provide simple, practical, and easily understood values that reflect the energy cost of physical activity. It is plausible that the increase in body mass and absolute submaximal oxygen uptake during gestation has the potential to affect the MET of pregnant women. Objective: The aim of this study was to measure the MET during the second trimester of pregnancy and to compare this with non-pregnant women. In addition, the measured MET values were compared to those proposed by the Compendium of Physical Activities (CPA). Design: Ten pregnant and ten non-pregnant women participated in this study. Ventilatory variables and heart rate (HR) were measured during four conditions on two different days: Condition 1 - sitting, Condition 2 - lying, Condition 3 - treadmill walking and Condition 4 - cycling. The women performed two conditions on each testing day; one resting condition followed by one exercising condition. The data were analysed using a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Bonferroni’s tests were used when significant differences were detected. Results: The MET was not significantly different between pregnant and non-pregnant women either at rest or during exercise (p > 0.05). While cycling, the MET obtained by indirect calorimetry (IC) was significantly higher than the CPA predicted MET, regardless of group (pregnant cycling p = 0.002 and non-pregnant cycling p 0.05). In general, (combined pregnant and non-pregnant data), VE and HR were significantly higher during seated rest, when compared with supine rest and all ventilatory variables, HR and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were significantly higher during cycling, when compared with walking (p > 0.05). Conclusion: METs were unaffected by pregnancy at rest or when undertaking either walking or cycling exercise during the second trimester of pregnancy. The MET of cycling was significantly underestimated by the CPA, when compared to IC, in both groups

Avaliação da reprodutibilidade e validade de questionário de atividade física para gestantes Evaluation of the reproducibility and validity of a physical activity questionnaire for pregnant women

INTRODUÇÃO: A prática de atividade física tem sido incentivada por vários organismos nacionais e internacionais visando a promoção de saúde. Entretanto não existe consenso acerca da influência e da intensidade ótima de atividade física durante a gestação, possivelmente devido a dificuldades de mensuração e classificação do nível de atividade física através de questionários. Não se identificou qualquer estudo de validação de questionário de atividade física em gestantes no Brasil. O objetivo do presente estudo é analisar a reprodutibilidade e validade concorrente de um questionário de atividades físicas para gestantes. MÉTODOS: Em amostra de 68 gestantes, no segundo trimestre de gestação foi realizada entrevista para aplicação do questionário, que foi repetida com aproximadamente uma semana de intervalo e no puerpério. No período entre as duas primeiras entrevistas, as mulheres utilizaram monitor de freqüência cardíaca (n=38). RESULTADOS: As análises de reprodutibilidade foram adequadas com coeficientes de correlação intraclasse variando de 0,54 a 0,85. A análise das variáveis categóricas, com questões subjetivas e de autopercepção da atividade física, resultou em maior intervalo de coeficiente kappa com valores entre 0,29 e 0,76 entre a aplicação do questionário com uma semana de intervalo, e 0,08 a 0,70 comparado ao puerpério. As análises de validade conduziram a resultado satisfatório quanto à média das diferenças encontrada por intermédio do gráfico de Bland e Altman (1986) entre o questionário e o freqüencímetro. Entretanto, o intervalo da dispersão não se apresentou adequado, visto que variou em mais de sete horas para atividades leves e em quase onze horas por dia para atividades moderadas. As análises do presente estudo parecem assegurar a reprodutibilidade do questionário de atividade física para gestantes. No entanto, com relação à validação, a comparação com os resultados obtidos pelo freqüêncímetro não mostrou graus de concordância adequados.<br>INTRODUCTION: Physical activity practice has been encouraged by several national and international entities aiming health promotion. However, there is no consensus concerning the influence and optimal intensity of physical activity during pregnancy, probably due to difficulties to measure and classify the level of physical activity by questionnaires. It has not been identified any validation study of physical activity questionnaire on Brazilian pregnant women. The purpose of the present study is to analyze the reliability and concurrent validity of a physical activity questionnaire for pregnant women. METHODS: A sample of 68 women in the second trimester of pregnancy has been interviewed by the elaborated questionnaire. Reliability was assessed after approximately a week and in the postpartum. The subjects used a heart rate monitor between the two first interviews (n=38). RESULTS: Reproducibility analyses were adapted with interclass correlation coefficients varying from 0.54 to 0.85. The analysis of categorical variables, with subjective questions of self-perception of physical activity, resulted in wider range of kappa coefficients, with values between 0.29 and 0.76 for application of the questionnaire within one week of interval, and between 0.08 and 0.70 when compared with the postpartum. The validity analyses had a satisfactory result considering the average of differences seen through Bland-Altman graphics comparing questionnaire and the heart rate monitors. However, the dispersion interval was not adequate, since it varied in more than seven hours for light activities and almost eleven hours per day for moderate activities. Analyses of current study seem to assure the reliability of the physical activity questionnaire for pregnant women. However, concerning validation, the comparison with results obtained by heart rate monitors did not show adequate degrees of agreement