Diferentes esquemas de indução para transplante renal com doador vivo

Abstract Introduction: Indications for induction therapy is not consensual in living donors. Objective: The objective of this study was compare no induction with thymoglobulin and basiliximab induction in the incidence of acute rejection in kidney transplantation with living donor. Methods: We select all cases of renal transplantation with living donor performed in Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu da UNESP during the period of January 2010 to December 2013. The group was divided by the type of medication used for induction. Results: A total of 90 patients were evaluated. There were no differences in baseline characteristics of age and underlying disease. The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was higher in the group without induction (42.9%) compared to basiliximab group (20%) and Thymoglobulin (16.7%), p = 0.04. The rejection by compatibility shows that the identical had the lower rejection rate (10%). The haploidentical group without induction had the highest rejection rates (53.3%). In all distinct group the rejection rates were similar with basiliximab or Thymoglobulin, p = NS. The use of induction therapy was associated independently with a lower risk of rejection (OR = 0.32 CI: 0.11 to 0.93, p = 0.036). There were no differences in renal function at 6 months and patient survival and graft in the three groups. Discussion: The haploidentical patients without induction were those with higher rates of acute rejection. The group of patients induced with Thymoglobulin had a higher immunological risk, however showed low rates of rejection. Conclusion: The use of induction therapy resulted in lower rates of rejection in transplantation with living donor.Resumo Introdução: A indicação de terapia de indução não é consensual em doadores vivos. Objetivo: Comparar não indução com indução com basiliximab e timoglobulina na incidência de rejeição aguda em transplante renal com doador vivo. Métodos: Todos os casos de transplante renal com doador vivo realizados no serviço de transplante do Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu da UNESP no período de janeiro de 2010 a dezembro de 2013. O grupo foi dividido pelo tipo de medicação usada na indução. Resultados: Foram avaliados 90 pacientes. Não houve diferenças nas características basais de idade e doença de base. A taxa de rejeição aguda comprovada por biópsia foi maior no grupo sem indução (42,9%) em comparação aos grupos basiliximab (20%) e timoglobulina (16,7%), p = 0,04. A divisão das rejeições por compatibilidade mostra que os idênticos apresentaram menor taxa de rejeição (10%). O grupo haploidêntico sem indução apresentou as maiores taxas de rejeição (53,3%). No grupo distinto, todos foram induzidos e as taxas de rejeição foram semelhantes com basiliximab ou timoglobulina, p = NS. O uso de terapia de indução associou-se de forma independente a menor risco de rejeição (OR = 0,32 IC: 0,11-0,93, p = 0,036). Não houve diferenças na função renal aos 6 meses e sobrevida do paciente e enxerto nos três grupos. Discussão: Os pacientes haploidênticos sem indução foram os que apresentaram maiores taxas de rejeição aguda. O grupo de pacientes induzidos com timoglobulina apresentava maior risco imunológico, entretanto, eles mostraram baixas taxas de rejeição. Conclusão: O uso de terapia de indução resultou em menores taxas de rejeição em transplante com doador vivo

Behavioral measures to reduce non-adherence in renal transplant recipients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Solid-organ transplant recipients present a high rate of non-adherence to drug treatment. Few interventional studies have included approaches aimed at increasing adherence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an educational and behavioral strategy on treatment adherence of kidney transplant recipients. In a randomized prospective study, incident renal transplant patients (n = 111) were divided into two groups: control group (received usual transplant patient education) and treatment group (usual transplant patient education plus ten additional weekly 30-min education/counseling sessions about immunosuppressive drugs and behavioral changes). Treatment adherence was assessed using ITAS adherence questionnaire after 3 months. Renal function at 3, 6, and 12 months, and the incidence of transplant rejection were evaluated. The non-adherence rates were 46.4 and 14.5 % in the control and treatment groups (p = 0.001), respectively. The relative risk for non-adherence was 2.59 times (CI 1.38-4.88) higher in the control group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a 5.84 times (CI 1.8-18.8, p = 0.003) higher risk of non-adherence in the control group. There were no differences in renal function and rejection rates between groups. A behavioral and educational strategy addressing the patient's perceptions and knowledge about the anti-rejection drugs significantly improved the short-term adherence to immunosuppressive therapy

Kidney transplantation is associated with reduced myocardial fibrosis. A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study with native T1 mapping

Abstract Background The measurement of native T1 through cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a noninvasive method of assessing myocardial fibrosis without gadolinium contrast. No studies so far have evaluated native T1 after renal transplantation. The primary aim of the current study is to assess changes in the myocardium native T1 6 months after renal transplantation. Methods We prospectively evaluated 44 renal transplant patients with 3 T CMR exams: baseline at the beginning of transplantation and at 6 months after transplantation. Results The native T1 time was measured in the midventricular septum and decreased significantly from 1331 ± 52 ms at the baseline to 1298 ± 42 ms 6 months after transplantation (p = 0.001). The patients were split into two groups through a two-step cluster algorithm: In cluster-1 (n = 30) the left ventricular (LV) mass index and the prevalence of diabetes were lower. In cluster-2 (n = 14) the LV mass index and diabetes prevalence were higher. Decrease in native T1 values was significant only in the patients in cluster-1 (p = 0.001). Conclusions The native myocardial T1 time decreased significantly 6 months after renal transplant, which may be associated with the regression of the reactive fibrosis. The patients with greater baseline LV mass index and the diabetic group did not reach a significant decrease in T1

Evaluation of the 1000 renal transplants carried out at the University Hospital of the Botucatu Medical School (HCFMB) - UNESP and their evolution over the years

<div><p>ABSTRACT Introduction: The progress in kidney transplantation has been evident over the years, as well as its benefits for patients. Objectives: To evaluate the 1.000 kidney transplants performed at the Botucatu Medical School University Hospital, subdividing the patients in different periods, according to the current immunosuppression, and evaluating the differences in graft and patient survival. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of the transplants performed between 06/17/87 to 07/31/16, totaling 1,046 transplants, subdivided into four different periods: 1) 1987 to 2000: cyclosporine with azathioprine; 2) 2001 to 2006: cyclosporine with mycophenolate; 3) 2007 to 2014: tacrolimus with antimetabolic; and 4) 2015 to 2016: tacrolimus with antimetabolic, with increased use of the combination of tacrolimus and mTOR inhibitors. Results: There was an increase in the mean age of recipients and increase in deceased donors and their age in the last two periods. There was a reduction in graft function delay, being 54.3% in the fourth period, compared to 78.8% in the first, p = 0.002. We found a reduction in acute rejection, being 6.1% in the last period compared to 36.3% in the first, p = 0.001. Urological complications and diabetes after transplantation were more frequent in the first two periods. The rates of cytomegalovirus infection were higher in the last two periods. There was an improvement in graft survival, p = 0.003. There was no difference in patient survival, p = 0.77 (Figure 2). Conclusion: There was a significant increase in the number of transplants, with evolution in graft survival, despite the worsening in the profiles of recipients and donors.</p></div

Long-term outcomes of the Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome after kidney transplantation treated with eculizumab as first choice

<div><p>Introduction</p><p>The treatment of choice for Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) is the monoclonal antibody eculizumab. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of eculizumab in a cohort of kidney transplant patients suffering from aHUS.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Description of the prospective cohort of all the patients primarily treated with eculizumab after transplantation and divided into the therapeutic (onset of aHUS after transplantation) and prophylactic use (patients with previous diagnosis of aHUS undergoing kidney transplantation).</p><p>Results</p><p>Seven cases were outlined: five of therapeutic use and two, prophylactic. From the five cases of therapeutic use, there was improvement of the thrombotic microangiopathy in the 48 hours following the start of the drug and no patient experienced relapse during an average follow-up of 21 months in the continuous use of eculizumab (minimum of 6 and maximum of 42 months). One patient died at 6 months, due to <i>Aspergillus</i> infection. From the two cases of prophylactic use, one patient experienced relapsed thrombotic microangiopathy after 4 months and another patient remained asymptomatic after 16 months of follow-up, both on chronic treatment.</p><p>Discussion</p><p>The therapeutic use of eculizumab showed to be effective, with improvement of the microangiopathy parameters and persisting up to the end of the follow-up, without relapses. The additional risk of immunosuppression, leading to opportunistic infections, was well tolerated. The prophylactic use showed to be effective and safe; however, the doses and intervals should be individualized in order to avoid relapsed microangiopathy, especially in patients with factor H mutation.</p></div

Steps for the diagnosis of atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) in the study cohort.

<p>Steps for the diagnosis of atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) in the study cohort.</p

Hematological parameters and kidney function of the patients on therapeutic use of eculizumab after the transplantation at time points: Immediately before infusion, 48 hours after, 6 months and at the end of follow up.

<p>Hematological parameters and kidney function of the patients on therapeutic use of eculizumab after the transplantation at time points: Immediately before infusion, 48 hours after, 6 months and at the end of follow up.</p

Individual outcome of the hematological and kidney parameters of the patients on therapeutic use (group 1) of eculizumab after the kidney transplantation at time points: Immediately before infusion, 48 hours after, 6 months and at the end of follow up.

<p>A: creatinine; B: estimated kidney function (eGFR); C: haptoglobin; D: platelets; E: LDH (lactate dehydrogenase); F: hemoglobin.</p