Exploring earned value management in the Spanish construction industry as a pathway to competitive advantage

[EN] As a well established discipline and profession, project management has its distinctive tools and techniques. One of them that has been considered the embodiment of the core principles of project management is the Earned Value Management (EVM). In managing construction projects, the EVM has been considered as a suitable tool and hence, has been implemented in various construction industry but absent in some others. Taking into account the dynamic environment where construction companies have to operate, particularly in turbulence environments as the direct result of recent global economic downturn, this paper explores the potential implementation of EVM in one of the construction industry, the Spanish construction industry. The outcomes confirm the needs for and feasibility of implementing EVM as a structured approach in the industry to reposition the Spanish construction industry with the long term view to increase its project management maturity level as a pathway to gaining competitive advantage.Universitat Politecnica de Valencia [grant number 19701344]Sutrisna, M.; Pellicer, E.; Torres-Machí, C.; Picornell, M. (2018). Exploring earned value management in the Spanish construction industry as a pathway to competitive advantage. International Journal of Construction Management. 20(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1459155S112201Anbari, F. T. (2004). Earned value project management method and extensions. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 32(3), 97-97. doi:10.1109/emr.2004.25113Aram, J. D., & Walochik, K. (1996). Improvisation and the Spanish Manager. International Studies of Management & Organization, 26(4), 73-89. doi:10.1080/00208825.1996.11656695Brandon, D. M. (1998). Implementing Earned Value Easily and Effectively. Project Management Journal, 29(2), 11-18. doi:10.1177/875697289802900204Brown, A., & Adams, J. (2000). Measuring the effect of project management on construction outputs: a new approach. International Journal of Project Management, 18(5), 327-335. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(99)00026-5Bryde, D. J. (2003). Modelling project management performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(2), 229-254. doi:10.1108/02656710310456635Chen, H. L., Chen, W. T., & Lin, Y. L. (2016). Earned value project management: Improving the predictive power of planned value. International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), 22-29. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.008De la Cruz, M. P., del Caño, A., & de la Cruz, E. (2006). Downside Risks in Construction Projects Developed by the Civil Service: The Case of Spain. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(8), 844-852. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2006)132:8(844)Din, S., Abd-Hamid, Z., & Bryde, D. J. (2011). ISO 9000 certification and construction project performance: The Malaysian experience. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), 1044-1056. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.11.001Eldin, N. N. (1989). Measurement of Work Progress: Quantitative Technique. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(3), 462-474. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1989)115:3(462)Gidado, K. I. (1996). Project complexity: The focal point of construction production planning. Construction Management and Economics, 14(3), 213-225. doi:10.1080/014461996373476Hastak, M., Halpin, D. W., & Vanegas, J. (1996). COMPASS—New Paradigm for Project Cost Control Strategy and Planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(3), 254-264. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1996)122:3(254)D. Holt, G., & S. Goulding, J. (2014). Conceptualisation of ambiguous-mixed-methods within building and construction research. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 12(2), 244-262. doi:10.1108/jedt-02-2013-0020Ibbs, C. W., & Kwak, Y. H. (2000). Assessing Project Management Maturity. Project Management Journal, 31(1), 32-43. doi:10.1177/875697280003100106Jugdev, K., & Thomas, J. (2002). 2002 Student Paper Award Winner: Project Management Maturity Models: The Silver Bullets of Competitive Advantage? Project Management Journal, 33(4), 4-14. doi:10.1177/875697280203300402Kim, E., Wells, W. G., & Duffey, M. R. (2003). A model for effective implementation of Earned Value Management methodology. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 375-382. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00049-2Kim, T., Kim, Y.-W., & Cho, H. (2016). Customer Earned Value: Performance Indicator from Flow and Value Generation View. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(1), 04015017. doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000377Laufer, A., & Tucker, R. L. (1987). Is construction project planning really doing its job? A critical examination of focus, role and process. Construction Management and Economics, 5(3), 243-266. doi:10.1080/01446198700000023Liberatore, M. J., Pollack-Johnson, B., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Project Management in Construction: Software Use and Research Directions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(2), 101-107. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2001)127:2(101)Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking Project Management Performance and Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202-217. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.012Navon, R., & Haskaya, I. (2006). Is detailed progress monitoring possible without designated manual data collection? Construction Management and Economics, 24(12), 1225-1229. doi:10.1080/01446190600999097Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). Taking the «Q» Out of Research: Teaching Research Methodology Courses Without the Divide Between Quantitative and Qualitative Paradigms. Quality & Quantity, 39(3), 267-295. doi:10.1007/s11135-004-1670-0Oviedo-Haito, R. J., Jiménez, J., Cardoso, F. F., & Pellicer, E. (2014). Survival Factors for Subcontractors in Economic Downturns. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(3), 04013056. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000811Pellicer, E., Sanz, M. A., Esmaeili, B., & Molenaar, K. R. (2016). Exploration of Team Integration in Spanish Multifamily Residential Building Construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(5), 05016012. doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000438Potts, K., & Ankrah, N. (2008). Construction Cost Management. doi:10.4324/9780203933015Vanhoucke, M. (2012). Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25175-7Yazici, H. J. (2009). The Role of Project Management Maturity and Organizational Culture in Perceived Performance. Project Management Journal, 40(3), 14-33. doi:10.1002/pmj.20121Yu, A. G., Flett, P. D., & Bowers, J. A. (2005). Developing a value-centred proposal for assessing project success. International Journal of Project Management, 23(6), 428-436. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.00

Information systems project manager soft competencies: A project-phase investigation

This article investigates the soft competencies by project phase that information systems (IS) project managers require for project success. The authors conducted 33 qualitative interviews to collect data from a sample of 22 IS project managers and business leaders located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The authors identified the key competencies for each of the IS project phases (initiation, planning, implementation, and close- out). The competencies were sorted into competency categories: personal attributes (e.g., eye for details), communication (e.g., effective questioning), leadership (e.g., create an effective project environment), negotiations (e.g., consensus building), professionalism (e.g., lifelong learning), social skills (e.g., charisma), and project management competencies (e.g., manage expectations). Each of the most important competencies is discussed and interconnections among competencies identified. How this research can be used by the practitioner and academic communities and the broader implications of this research are examined. © 2009 by the Project Management Institute

Linking Team Condition and Team Performance: A Transformational Leadership Approach

Because project teams in the construction industry shape the primary focus of the industry's project life cycle, a high-performance construction workplace facilitates employees’ technical and innovation skills through team development. Drawing on the current research in general teamwork and leadership, this study, from a theoretical perspective, extends the team condition as a hierarchical construct, incorporating six associated components. This article argues that team building and team development can be studied as ongoing processes that are crucial to project success. In order to reduce the risk of common method variance, the research analysis was completed using 94 construction teams from three different sources, within which team members rated their leader's transformational leadership behavior. The team leaders evaluated the team's conditions, and, lastly, the supervisor of each team rated the team's performance. The model shows that the team condition, which is defined as the factors that contribute to making a great team, has significant direct and indirect impacts on team performance. Furthermore, the transformational leadership behavior of team leaders showed a mediating role between the team condition and the performance