FEASIBILITY OF VACCINATION IN PREVENTING SECONDARY CASES OF HEPATITIS A VIRUS INFECTION

Although the secondary transmission of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection is preventable through vaccination, it is not known whether the vaccination of household contacts is feasible. To this end, we conducted a prospective cohort study among the household contacts, 40 years of age or less, of all persons infected with primary HAV infection (index cases) and admitted to eight hospitals in southern Italy within 7 days of onset. Household contacts were vaccinated, and serum samples were taken at vaccination and after 14 and 45 days. Secondary cases were defined as those with IgM seroconversion occurring at least two weeks after enrolment. Coprimary cases were those assumed to have had the same exposure as the index case. Susceptible cases were those who were negative for both IgG and IgM. A total of 495 household contacts participated (acceptance rate of 65%); 65% were vaccinated within 4 days of admission of the index case and 95% within 7 days. At enrolment, 196 (39.6%) household contacts were immune (IgG-positive serum). During follow-up, 19 (3.8%) were IgM-positive: 13 (2.6%) were coprimary cases and 6 (1.2%; 95% CI: 0.2–3.2) secondary cases (5 identified at 14 days from vaccination and 1 at 45 days). Of the 241 susceptible cases, 192 (79.7%) had developed IgG antibodies at 14 days and only 3 (1.2%) did not develop IgG antibodies at 45 days. The 65% acceptance rate and the finding that 95% of the participating household contacts were vaccinated within 7 days of the index case’s hospitalization indicate that timely vaccination is indeed feasible. The necessity of returning for the collection of blood samples probably decreased the acceptance rate

Long-term lymphoblastoid interferon-α therapy for non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C: An Italian multicentre study on dose and duration of IFNα treatment

The aims of the study were to evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of different doses of interferon-α (IFNα) and different durations of treatment in chronic hepatitis C by comparing 3 or 6 mega units (MUs) three times weekly given for either 12 or 24 months, and the possibility of obtaining a response in non-responder patients by increasing the dose or by administering IFN daily. A total of 504 patients with non- cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C enrolled in a multicentre study were consecutively assigned to receive either 3 (255 patients) or 6 MU (249 patients) of lymphoblastoid IFNα 3 times a week (tiw). At the 12th month of therapy, patients with normal aminotransferase (AMT) in both groups were either given IFN for an additional 12 months with an unmodified or halved dose, or else discontinued therapy. For patients with unmodified AMT levels after 6 months of therapy, the IFN dose was doubled in the 3-MU group, while it was administered at 3 MU daily in the 6-MU group. When no improvement was achieved, therapy was discontinued; otherwise it was prolonged until the 18th month. Patients were followed up for 12 months after discontinuing IFN. Of the 255 patients enrolled at 3 MU, therapy was stopped during the first 6 months in 36 patients (14.1%) because of side effects, and in 24 (9.4%) because of lack of cooperation. Of the remaining 195 patients at the 6th month of therapy, 119 (61%) had normal and 76 (39%) unmodified AMT levels; 14 of the 76 normalized AMT after doubling the dose of IFN, but only 5 (6.6%) had a sustained response. Of the 119 patients with normal AMT, 40 discontinued IFN at the 12th month (schedule A), 39 remained at 3 MU tiw (schedule B) and 40 were given a dose of 1.5 MU tiw (schedule C) for an additional 12 months. At the end of follow-up, 23/40 (57.5%) patients in schedule A, 31/39 (79.5%) on schedule B and 29/40 (72.5%) on schedule C still had normal AMT (A vs. B p = 0.04). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the sustained response rate for patients enrolled at 3 MUs, including the 5 initial non-responders, was 34.5%. Of the 249 patients enrolled at 6 MU, therapy was discontinued during the first 6 months for 39 (15.7%) because of side effects, and for 27 (10.8%) because of lack of cooperation. Of the remaining 183 patients at the 6th month of therapy, 110 (60%) had normal and 73 (40%) unmodified AMT levels. Of the 73 patients, 55 accepted the daily regimen and 8 of them (14.5%) showed a sustained response. Of the 110 patients with normal AMT, 32 (29.1%), despite normalization of AMT, spontaneously discontinued IFN or reduced the dose because of a poor quality of life, while 78 continued with 6 MU until the 12th month, when therapy was discontinued for 28 (schedule A1); 24 patients were given an unmodified dose (schedule B1) and 26 a halved dose (schedule C1) for an additional 12 months. At the end of follow-up, 18/28 (64.3%) patients on schedule A1, 19/24 (79.2%) on schedule B1 and 19/26 (73.1%) on C1 still had normal AMT (p = NS). In an intention-to-treat evaluation, the sustained response rate for patients enrolled at 6 MU, including the 8 from the daily treatment, was 25.7% (64/249). HCV viraemia was undetectable 1 year after discontinuation of IFN in 72.6% of patients with a sustained response. Sustained response was observed in 36.4% of patients with minimal, 46.6% of those with mild, and 33.3% with moderate or severe histological activity (p = NS). The rate of sustained response was lower in patients with genotype 1b (23.6%) than in those with genotype 2a (67.8%, p = 0.002) or genotype 3 (50%, p = 0.03), irrespective of the histological activity. In conclusion, 6 MU IFNα are no more effective than 3 MU in inducing a sustained response in treatments of both 12 and 24 months. A 24-month treatment is more effective than a 12-month treatment in maintaining a biochemical response after discontinuation of IFN. In terms of efficacy, compliance and cost, 3 MU for 24 months appears to be the best treatment schedule. The benefit of doubling the dose of IFN for the 3 MU non-responders is slight, while the daily administration of 3 MU IFN seems to be more effective

Determinants of virologic and immunologic outcomes in chronically HIV-infected subjects undergoing repeated treatment interruptions: The Istituto Superiore di Sanità-Pulsed Antiretroviral Therapy (ISS-PART) study

BACKGROUND: Factors influencing the outcome of structured treatment interruptions (STIs) in HIV chronic infection are not fully elucidated. METHODS: In ISS-PART, 273 subjects were randomly assigned to arm A (137 assigned to continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy [HAART]) and arm B (136 assigned to 5 STIs of 1, 1, 2, 2, and 3 months' duration, each followed by 3 months of therapy). Main outcome measures were the proportion of subjects with a CD4 count >500 cells/mm, the rate of virologic failure, and the emergence of resistance at 24 months. RESULTS: The proportion of subjects with a CD4 count >500 cells/mm was higher in arm A than in arm B (86.5% vs. 69.1%; P = 0.0075). Pre-HAART CD4 cell count and male gender were independent predictors of a CD4 count >500 cells/mm in arm B. The overall risk of virologic failure was not increased in arm B; however, it was higher in the 38 subjects who had resistance mutations in the rebounding virus. Archived mutations at baseline and the use of a regimen that included an unboosted protease inhibitor (PI), compared with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based HAART, independently predicted the emergence of plasma mutations during STI (P = 0.002 for DNA mutations and P = 0.048 for PI-based HAART). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with preexisting mutations and treated with unboosted PI-based HAART should not be enrolled in studies of time-fixed treatment interruptions, being at higher risk of developing plasma mutations during STI and virologic failure at therapy reinstitution. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc