The Role of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Regulating Social Familiarity-Induced Anxiolysis

Overcoming specific fears and subsequent anxiety can be greatly enhanced by the presence of familiar social partners, but the neural circuitry that controls this phenomenon remains unclear. To overcome this, the social interaction (SI) habituation test was developed in this lab to systematically investigate the effects of social familiarity on anxiety-like behavior in rats. Here, we show that social familiarity selectively reduced anxiety-like behaviors induced by an ethological anxiogenic stimulus. The anxiolytic effect of social familiarity could be elicited over multiple training sessions and was specific to both the presence of the anxiogenic stimulus and the familiar social partner. In addition, socially familiar conspecifics served as a safety signal, as anxiety-like responses returned in the absence of the familiar partner. The expression of the social familiarity-induced anxiolysis (SFiA) appears dependent on the prefrontal cortex (PFC), an area associated with cortical regulation of fear and anxiety behaviors. Inhibition of the PFC, with bilateral injections of the GABAA agonist muscimol, selectively blocked the expression of SFiA while having no effect on SI with a novel partner. Finally, the effect of D-cycloserine, a cognitive enhancer that clinically enhances behavioral treatments for anxiety, was investigated with SFiA. D-cycloserine, when paired with familiarity training sessions, selectively enhanced the rate at which SFiA was acquired. Collectively, these outcomes suggest that the PFC has a pivotal role in SFiA, a complex behavior involving the integration of social cues of familiarity with contextual and emotional information to regulate anxiety-like behavior

Blocking the mineralocorticoid receptor in humans prevents the stress-induced enhancement of centromedial amygdala connectivity with the dorsal striatum

Two research lines argue for rapid stress-induced reallocations of neural network activity involving the amygdala. One focuses on the role of norepinephrine (NE) in mediating a shift towards the salience network and improving vigilance processing, whereas the other focuses on the role of cortisol in enhancing automatic, habitual responses. It has been suggested that the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is critical in shifting towards habitual responses, which are supported by the dorsal striatum. However, until now it remained unclear whether these two reallocations of neural recourses might be part of the same phenomenon and develop immediately after stress onset. We combined methods used in both approaches and hypothesized specifically that stress would lead to rapidly enhanced involvement of the striatum as assessed by amygala-striatal connectivity. Furthermore, we tested the hypothesis that this shift depends on cortisol interacting with the MR, by using a randomized, placebo-controlled, full-factorial, between-subjects design with the factors stress and MR-blockade (spironolactone). We investigated 101 young, healthy men using functional magnetic resonance imaging after stress induction, which led to increased negative mood, heart rate, and cortisol levels. We confirmed our hypothesis by revealing a stress-by-MR-blockade interaction on the functional connectivity between the centromedial amygdala (CMA) and the dorsal striatum. Stress rapidly enhanced CMA-striatal connectivity and this effect was correlated with the stress-induced cortisol response, but required MR availability. This finding might suggest that the stress-induced shift described by distinct research lines might capture different aspects of the same phenomenon, ie, a reallocation of neural resources coordinated by both NE and cortisol