MARKET-BASED SOLUTIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS: DISCUSSION

There is rapidly growing interest in the use of market-based (MB) instruments in environmental policy. The papers in this session discuss three relatively new areas for such policies: groundwater contamination, nonpoint source surface-water pollution and carbon sequestration. The papers point out the potential for MB policies in these areas, but significant challenges remain. This comment highlights challenges related to five issues: monitoring and enforcement, trading ratios, baselines, transaction costs, and risk and uncertainty. All these issues must be addressed before MB policies can take the full step from economic theory to regulatory reality.global warming, carbon sequestration, groundwater contamination, nonpoint pollution, effluent trading, tradable emissions permits, Environmental Economics and Policy, Q2, Q28, Q25,

Markets for the Environment

Environmental Economics and Policy,

SUSTAINABILITY AS INTERGENERATIONAL FAIRNESS

This paper presents an economic model of sustainability defined as intergenerational fairness. Assuming that intergenerational fairness is an obligation of each generation, a recursive optimization problem is obtained. The problem has the advantage that uncertainty can readily be incorporated in the model and it can be solved numerically for a wide range of specifications. The possibility of tradeoffs between efficiency and sustainability are discussed. Under plausible conditions, it is show that a sustainability obligation is met only if there is the expectations of economic growth.Agribusiness,

THE ENVIRONMENTALLY OPTIMAL TRADING RATIO

In the standard economic model of cap and trade policies, the regulator is assumed to place zero value on pollution reductions below the cap. This paper considers an alternative case, where the policy makers can manipulate the rules of the program to achieve improved environmental performance. This is achieved by manipulating the trading ratio, the units of pollution credits that are obtained for each unit of pollution reduction. Using a parsimonious model of a transferable discharge permits program, we identify the environmentally optimal trading ratio that maximizes the environmental gains of trading. The model suggests an alternative explanation why non-unitary trading ratios are common and is a counterpoint to the cost-minimizing model that predominates in economics. We conclude by recommending that a middle-ground should be sought, where both environmental gains and cost efficiencies are given weight.Environmental Economics and Policy,

SHOULD AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS CARE THAT THE SUBJECTIVE EXPECTED UTILITY HYPOTHESIS IS FALSE?

This paper argues that the subjective expected utility (SEU) hypothesis has serious limitations in both positive and normative analysis. In addition to experimental evidence, we discuss examples where alternatives to the SEU model provide a richer framework for the study problems of choice under uncertainty.Research Methods/ Statistical Methods,