10 research outputs found
The maintenance of sex in bacteria is ensured by its potential to reload genes
Why sex is maintained in nature is a fundamental question in biology. Natural
genetic transformation (NGT) is a sexual process by which bacteria actively
take up exogenous DNA and use it to replace homologous chromosomal sequences.
As it has been demonstrated, the role of NGT in repairing deleterious mutations
under constant selection is insufficient for its survival, and the lack of
other viable explanations have left no alternative except that DNA uptake
provides nucleotides for food. Here we develop a novel simulation approach for
the long-term dynamics of genome organization (involving the loss and
acquisition of genes) in a bacterial species consisting of a large number of
spatially distinct populations subject to independently fluctuating ecological
conditions. Our results show that in the presence of weak inter-population
migration NGT is able to subsist as a mechanism to reload locally lost,
intermittently selected genes from the collective gene pool of the species
through DNA uptake from migrants. Reloading genes and combining them with those
in locally adapted genomes allow individual cells to re-adapt faster to
environmental changes. The machinery of transformation survives under a wide
range of model parameters readily encompassing real-world biological
conditions. These findings imply that the primary role of NGT is not to serve
the cell with food, but to provide homologous sequences for restoring genes
that have disappeared from or become degraded in the local population.Comment: 16 pages with 3 color figures. Manuscript accepted for publication in
Genetics (www.genetics.org
Relative time constraints improve molecular dating
Dating the tree of life is central to understanding the evolution of life on Earth. Molecular clocks calibrated with fossils represent the state of the art for inferring the ages of major groups. Yet, other information on the timing of species diversification can be used to date the tree of life. This is the case for instance for horizontal gene transfer events and ancient coevolutionary relationships such as (endo)symbioses, which can imply temporal relationships between two nodes in a phylogeny (DavĂn et al. 2018). This can be particularly helpful when the geological record is sparse, e.g. for microorganisms, which represent the vast majority of extant and extinct biodiversity
Genome size evolution in the Archaea
What determines variation in genome size, gene content and genetic diversity at the broadest scales across the tree of life? Much of the existing work contrasts eukaryotes with prokaryotes, the latter represented mainly by Bacteria. But any general theory of genome evolution must also account for the Archaea, a diverse and ecologically important group of prokaryotes that represent one of the primary domains of cellular life. Here, we survey the extant diversity of Bacteria and Archaea, and ask whether the general principles of genome evolution deduced from the study of Bacteria and eukaryotes also apply to the archaeal domain. Although Bacteria and Archaea share a common prokaryotic genome architecture, the extant diversity of Bacteria appears to be much higher than that of Archaea. Compared with Archaea, Bacteria also show much greater genome-level specialisation to specific ecological niches, including parasitism and endosymbiosis. The reasons for these differences in long-term diversification rates are unclear, but might be related to fundamental differences in informational processing machineries and cell biological features that may favour archaeal diversification in harsher or more energy-limited environments. Finally, phylogenomic analyses suggest that the first Archaea were anaerobic autotrophs that evolved on the early Earth
Protein Flexibility Partitions the Effects of Energy Landscape Roughness Between Activation Energy and Internal Friction
An estimate of the deepest branches of the tree of life from ancient vertically-evolving genes
Core gene phylogenies provide a window into early evolution, but different gene sets and analytical methods have yielded substantially different views of the tree of life. Trees inferred from a small set of universal core genes have typically supported a long branch separating the archaeal and bacterial domains. By contrast, recent analyses of a broader set of non-ribosomal genes have suggested that Archaea may be less divergent from Bacteria, and that estimates of inter-domain distance are inflated due to accelerated evolution of ribosomal proteins along the inter-domain branch. Resolving this debate is key to determining the diversity of the archaeal and bacterial domains, the shape of the tree of life, and our understanding of the early course of cellular evolution. Here, we investigate the evolutionary history of the marker genes key to the debate. We show that estimates of a reduced Archaea-Bacteria (AB) branch length result from inter-domain gene transfers and hidden paralogy in the expanded marker gene set. By contrast, analysis of a broad range of manually curated marker gene datasets from an evenly sampled set of 700 Archaea and Bacteria reveals that current methods likely underestimate the AB branch length due to substitutional saturation and poor model fit; that the best-performing phylogenetic markers tend to support longer inter-domain branch lengths; and that the AB branch lengths of ribosomal and non-ribosomal marker genes are statistically indistinguishable. Furthermore, our phylogeny inferred from the 27 highest-ranked marker genes recovers a clade of DPANN at the base of the Archaea and places the bacterial Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR) within Bacteria as the sister group to the Chloroflexota