161 research outputs found
Effect of Albendazole on Human Hydatid Cysts: An Ultrastructural Study
Five patients with hepatic (3), pelvic (1) or spinal (1) hydatid cysts received 10 mg/kg/d albendazole for 1–3
months prior to surgery. Daughter cysts were present in the spinal hydatid and in one patient with hepatic
disease. Electron microscope examination of the cyst tissue of the pelvic and the 2 hepatic cysts lacking
daughter cysts showed no evidence of germinal layer, and the protoscoleces were dead. The primary cyst of
the hepatic hydatid with daughter cysts (1 month therapy) was also judged dead but some pieces of the
daughter cyst germinal layer appeared normal and had unaffected protoscoleces. The daughter cyst tissue of
the spinal hydatid (3 month therapy) appeared normal and the protoscoleces viable. In view of the
undetermined viability of human hydatids before chemotherapy, treatment of longer than 1 month is
advocated for hepatic cysts, particularly if daughter cysts are present, and longer therapy is indicated for
spinal disease
Studies on the cuticle and epidermal secretory cells of lumbricid and enchytraeid oligochaetes
The histochemistry of the cuticle and epidermal secretory cells of seven lumbricids is recorded and three types of secretory cell delineated. The function of these secretions is discussed and a reassessment of the identity of the so-called albumen cells is made.
At the ultrastructural level eleven lumbricids are studied. Details of the cuticle provide the basis for a possible explanation of the orientation of the collagen fibres within it. The three types of secretory cell are described, one of which shows species variation, the significance of which is discussed.
The epidermis of nine enchytraeid species is examined histo- chemically and ultrastructurally. Species of the genus Lumbricillus are studied in depth; the remaining species, from differing habitats, are compared with it
Environment supports design : Alvaro Siza and Wellesley College
Thesis (M. Arch.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1993.Includes bibliographical references (p. 63).The antecedent of this thesis is a reaction to a history of imposition on architectural solutions and the notion that there are architectural equations or languages that can repeatedly answer design and social issues regardless of time and place. This position does not advocate designing in a vacuum, quite the opposite. As Siza says in the quote on page 34: " ... proposals which refuse to set limits to reality cannot be based in a fixed image nor can they have a linear development." If the focused priority holds on the whole problem at that very moment and place, the result will become a response to some of the much larger questions, and that singular project will be able to use the greater body of knowledge which we all accrue over time, and not vise versa. The intent of this thesis is to explore some of the works of one architect, Alvaro Siza, as an exercise in understanding a process of form-making. The Portuguese architect was chosen for his unique stance in the recent past's and present time's architectural situation, and for the author's continual attraction to his work. The research of Siza's projects becomes a springboard for approaching an investigation into a design project for Wellesley College. A dialogue with the work of Alvaro Siza will supply feedback and examples. Inevitably, the research will have a life within the exploration of the Wellesley project as the movement from one to the other forces better understanding of both.Sylvia Tove-Ann Richards.M.Arch
Stacks and D-Brane Bundles
In this paper we describe explicitly how the twisted ``bundles'' on a D-brane
worldvolume in the presence of a nontrivial B field, can be understood in terms
of sheaves on stacks. We also take this opportunity to provide the physics
community with a readable introduction to stacks and generalized spaces.Comment: 24 pages, LaTeX; v2: references adde
High prevalence of <i>Rickettsia africae</i> variants in <i>Amblyomma variegatum</i> ticks from domestic mammals in rural western Kenya: implications for human health
Tick-borne spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsioses are emerging human diseases caused by obligate intracellular Gram-negative bacteria of the genus Rickettsia. Despite being important causes of systemic febrile illnesses in travelers returning from sub-Saharan Africa, little is known about the reservoir hosts of these pathogens. We conducted surveys for rickettsiae in domestic animals and ticks in a rural setting in western Kenya. Of the 100 serum specimens tested from each species of domestic ruminant 43% of goats, 23% of sheep, and 1% of cattle had immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to the SFG rickettsiae. None of these sera were positive for IgG against typhus group rickettsiae. We detected Rickettsia africae–genotype DNA in 92.6% of adult Amblyomma variegatum ticks collected from domestic ruminants, but found no evidence of the pathogen in blood specimens from cattle, goats, or sheep. Sequencing of a subset of 21 rickettsia-positive ticks revealed R. africae variants in 95.2% (20/21) of ticks tested. Our findings show a high prevalence of R. africae variants in A. variegatum ticks in western Kenya, which may represent a low disease risk for humans. This may provide a possible explanation for the lack of African tick-bite fever cases among febrile patients in Kenya
Human Infection with Rickettsia felis, Kenya
This flea-borne pathogen was detected in febrile patients in North Eastern Province, Kenya
Evaluation of the ECOSSE Model for Estimating Soil Respiration from Eight European Permanent Grassland Sites
Acknowledgments We are grateful to Lukas Hörtnagl, Keller Sabina, Shiva Ghiasi and people from other investigated sites for providing us with the data. Funding This work is funded by the Super-G project (funded under EU Horizon 2020 programme: project number 774124).Peer reviewedPublisher PD
Allergic rhinitis : review of the diagnosis and management : South African Allergic Rhinitis Working Group
DATA AVAILABILITY : The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of
this study are available within the article.BACKGROUND : Allergic rhinitis (AR) has a significant impact on the community as a whole with
regard to quality of life and its relationship to allergic multi-morbidities. Appropriate diagnosis,
treatment and review of the efficacy of interventions can ameliorate these effects. Yet, the
importance of AR is often overlooked, and appropriate therapy is neglected. The availability
of effective medications and knowledge as to management are often lacking in both public and
private health systems.
METHODS : This review is based on a comprehensive literature search and detailed discussions
by the South African Allergic Rhinitis Working Group (SAARWG).
RESULTS : The working group provided up-to-date recommendations on the epidemiology,
pathology, diagnosis and management of AR, appropriate to the South African setting.
CONCLUSION : Allergic rhinitis causes significant, often unappreciated, morbidity. It is a complex
disease related to an inflammatory response to environmental allergens. Therapy involves
education, evaluation of allergen sensitisation, pharmacological treatment, allergen
immunotherapy (AIT) and evaluation of the success of interventions. Regular use of saline; the
important role of intranasal corticosteroids, including those combined with topical
antihistamines and reduction in the use of systemic steroids are key. Practitioners should have
a thorough knowledge of associated morbidities and the need for specialist referral.
CONTRIBUTION : This review summarises the latest developments in the diagnosis and
management of AR such that it is a resource that allows easy access for family practitioners
and specialists alike.https://www.safpj.co.zaam2024ImmunologyOtorhinolaryngologyPaediatrics and Child HealthSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-bein
A hospital-site controlled intervention using audit and feedback to implement guidelines concerning inappropriate treatment of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections. However, many cases treated as hospital-acquired CAUTI are actually asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU). Evidence-based guidelines recommend that providers neither screen for nor treat ABU in most catheterized patients, but there is a significant gap between these guidelines and clinical practice. Our objectives are (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of an audit and feedback intervention for increasing guideline-concordant care concerning catheter-associated ABU and (2) to measure improvements in healthcare providers' knowledge of and attitudes toward the practice guidelines associated with the intervention.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The study uses a controlled pre/post design to test an intervention using audit and feedback of healthcare providers to improve their compliance with ABU guidelines. The intervention and the control sites are two VA hospitals. For objective 1 we will review medical records to measure the clinical outcomes of inappropriate screening for and treatment of catheter-associated ABU. For objective 2 we will survey providers' knowledge and attitudes. Three phases of our protocol are proposed: the first 12-month phase will involve observation of the baseline incidence of inappropriate screening for and treatment of ABU at both sites. This surveillance for clinical outcomes will continue at both sites throughout the study. Phase 2 consists of 12 months of individualized audit and feedback at the intervention site and guidelines distribution at both sites. The third phase, also over 12 months, will provide unit-level feedback at the intervention site to assess sustainability. Healthcare providers at the intervention site during phase 2 and at both sites during phase 3 will complete pre/post surveys of awareness and familiarity (knowledge), as well as of acceptance and outcome expectancy (attitudes) regarding the relevant practice guidelines.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Our proposal to bring clinical practice in line with published guidelines has significant potential to decrease overdiagnosis of CAUTI and associated inappropriate antibiotic use. Our study will also provide information about how to maximize effectiveness of audit and feedback to achieve guideline adherence in the inpatient setting.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p><a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01052545">NCT01052545</a></p
Nitrogen but not phosphorus addition affects symbiotic N2 fixation by legumes in natural and semi‑natural grasslands located on four continents
The amount of nitrogen (N) derived from symbiotic N2 fixation by legumes in grasslands might be affected by anthropogenic N and
phosphorus (P) inputs, but the underlying mechanisms are not known. Methods We evaluated symbiotic N2 fixation in 17
natural and semi-natural grasslands on four continents that are subjected to the same full-factorial N and P addition experiment, using the 15N natural abundance method. Results N as well as combined N and P (NP) addition reduced aboveground legume biomass by 65% and 45%, respectively, compared to the control, whereas P addition had no significant impact. Addition of N and/or P had no significant effect on the symbiotic N2 fixation per unit legume biomass. In consequence, the amount of N fixed annually per grassland area was less than half in the N addition treatments compared to control and P addition, irrespective of whether the dominant legumes were annuals or perennials. Conclusion Our results reveal that N addition mainly impacts symbiotic N2 fixation via reduced
biomass of legumes rather than changes in N2 fixation per unit legume biomass. The results show that soil N enrichment by anthropogenic activities significantly reduces N 2 fixation in grasslands, and these effects cannot be reversed by additional P amendment.EEA Santa CruzFil: Vázquez, Eduardo. University of Bayreuth. Department of Soil Ecology. Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER); AlemaniaFil: Vázquez, Eduardo. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Soil and Environment; SueciaFil: Schleuss, Per‑Marten. University of Bayreuth. Department of Soil Ecology. Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER); AlemaniaFil: Borer, Elizabeth T. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior; Estados UnidosFil: Bugalho, Miguel N. University of Lisbon. Centre for Applied Ecology “Prof. Baeta Neves” (CEABN-InBIO). School of Agriculture; Portugal.Fil: Caldeira, Maria. C. University of Lisbon. Forest Research Centre. School of Agriculture; Portugal.Fil: Eisenhauer, Nico. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; AlemaniaFil: Eisenhauer, Nico. Leipzig University. Institute of Biology; AlemaniaFil: Eskelinen, Anu. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; AlemaniaFil: Eskelinen, Anu. Physiological Diversity, Helmholtz Centrefor Environmental Research; AlemaniaFil: Eskelinen, Anu. University of Oulu. Ecology & Genetics; FinlandiaFil: Fay, Philip A. Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory (USDA-ARS); Estados UnidosFil: Haider, Sylvia. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; AlemaniaFil: Haider, Sylvia. Martin Luther University. Institute of Biology. Geobotany and Botanical Garden; AlemaniaFil: Jentsch, Anke. University of Bayreuth. Department of Soil Ecology. Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER); AlemaniaFil: Kirkman, Kevin P. University of KwaZulu-Natal. School of Life Sciences; SudáfricaFil: McCulley, Rebecca L. University of Kentucky. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Price, Jodi. Charles Sturt University. Institute for Land, Water and Society; Australia.Fil: Richards, Anna E. CSIRO Land and Water. Northern Territory; Australia.Fil: Risch, Anita C. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL; SuizaFil: Roscher, Christiane. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; AlemaniaFil: Roscher, Christiane. Physiological Diversity, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research; AlemaniaFil: Schütz, Martin. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL; SuizaFil: Seabloom, Eric William. University of Minnesota. Dept. of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior; Estados UnidosFil: Standish, Rachel J. Murdoch University. Harry Butler Institute; Australia.Fil: Stevens, Carly J. Lancaster University. Lancaster Environment Centre; Reino UnidoFil: Tedder, Michelle J. University of KwaZulu-Natal. School of Life Sciences; SudáfricaFil: Virtanen, Risto. University of Oulu. Ecology & Genetics; Finlandia.Fil: Spohn, Marie. University of Bayreuth. Department of Soil Ecology. Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER); AlemaniaFil: Spohn, Marie. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Soil and Environment; Sueci
- …