Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of muscle relaxants for adults with non-specific low back pain : systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of muscle relaxants for low back pain. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, clinicialtrialsregister.eu, and WHO ICTRP from inception to 23 February 2021. Eligibility criteria for study selection: Randomised controlled trials of muscle relaxants compared with placebo, usual care, waiting list, or no treatment in adults (≥18 years) reporting non-specific low back pain. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations, respectively. Random effects meta-analytical models through restricted maximum likelihood estimation were used to estimate pooled effects and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Outcomes included pain intensity (measured on a 0-100 point scale), disability (0-100 point scale), acceptability (discontinuation of the drug for any reason during treatment), and safety (adverse events, serious adverse events, and number of participants who withdrew from the trial because of an adverse event). Results: 49 trials were included in the review, of which 31, sampling 6505 participants, were quantitatively analysed. For acute low back pain, very low certainty evidence showed that at two weeks or less non-benzodiazepine antispasmodics were associated with a reduction in pain intensity compared with control (mean difference -7.7, 95% confidence interval-12.1 to-3.3) but not a reduction in disability (-3.3, -7.3 to 0.7). Low and very low certainty evidence showed that non-benzodiazepine antispasmodics might increase the risk of an adverse event (relative risk 1.6, 1.2 to 2.0) and might have little to no effect on acceptability (0.8, 0.6 to 1.1) compared with control for acute low back pain, respectively. The number of trials investigating other muscle relaxants and different durations of low back pain were small and the certainty of evidence was reduced because most trials were at high risk of bias. Conclusions: Considerable uncertainty exists about the clinical efficacy and safety of muscle relaxants. Very low and low certainty evidence shows that non-benzodiazepine antispasmodics might provide small but not clinically important reductions in pain intensity at or before two weeks and might increase the risk of an adverse event in acute low back pain, respectively. Large, high quality, placebo controlled trials are urgently needed to resolve uncertainty. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019126820 and Open Science Framework https://osf.io/mu2f5/

Trans-Spinal Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Functional Rehabilitation after Spinal Cord Injury: Review

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most debilitating injuries in the world. Complications after SCI, such as respiratory issues, bowel/bladder incontinency, pressure ulcers, autonomic dysreflexia, spasticity, pain, etc., lead to immense suffering, a remarkable reduction in life expectancy, and even premature death. Traditional rehabilitations for people with SCI are often insignificant or ineffective due to the severity and complexity of the injury. However, the recent development of noninvasive electrical neuromodulation treatments to the spinal cord have shed a ray of hope for these individuals to regain some of their lost functions, a reduction in secondary complications, and an improvement in their life quality. For this review, 250 articles were screened and about 150 were included to summarize the two most promising noninvasive spinal cord electrical stimulation methods of SCI rehabilitation treatment, namely, trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) and trans-spinal pulsed current stimulation (tsPCS). Both treatments have demonstrated good success in not only improving the sensorimotor function, but also autonomic functions. Due to the noninvasive nature and lower costs of these treatments, in the coming years, we expect these treatments to be integrated into regular rehabilitation therapies worldwide

Similarity of suffering: equivalence of psychological and psychosocial factors in neuropathic and non-neuropathic orofacial pain patients.

The degree to which neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain conditions differ in psychological and psychosocial status remains largely unexplored. A better understanding of these aspects would be of considerable benefit in helping to define whether similar psychological treatment strategies (eg, cognitive-behavioural therapy) can be adopted in the management of neuropathic pain as in non-neuropathic pain conditions. Chronic orofacial pain disorders present a unique opportunity to compare nociceptive and neuropathic pain in the same body region. Twenty-four patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain, 21 patients with temporomandibular disorder, and 38 healthy controls were assessed with a psychological/psychosocial battery encompassing the 4 dimensions of the pain experience; sensory-discriminative, affective-motivational, cognitive-evaluative, and psychosocial. Although patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain (neuropathic pain) and temporomandibular disorder (non-neuropathic pain) described the sensory aspects of their pain differently, they exhibited comparable negative affective-motivational, cognitive-evaluative, and psychosocial states, although these were significantly different compared to healthy controls. These findings support growing evidence that the negative affective, cognitive, and psychosocial state of chronic pain is universal, regardless of a neuropathic or nociceptive nature. Further characterisation of these 4 dimensions of the pain experience in different chronic pain subtypes may improve the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy

Anatomical changes at the level of the primary synapse in neuropathic pain: evidence from the spinal trigeminal nucleus.

peer reviewedAccumulated evidence from experimental animal models suggests that neuronal loss within the dorsal horn is involved in the development and/or maintenance of peripheral neuropathic pain. However, to date, no study has specifically investigated whether such neuroanatomical changes also occur at this level in humans. Using brain imaging techniques, we sought to determine whether anatomical changes were present in the spinal trigeminal nucleus in subjects with chronic orofacial neuropathic pain. In 22 subjects with painful trigeminal neuropathy and 44 pain-free controls, voxel-based morphometry of T1-weighted anatomical images and diffusion tensor images were used to assess regional gray matter volume and microstructural changes within the brainstem. In addition, deterministic tractography was used to assess the integrity of ascending pain pathways. Orofacial neuropathic pain was associated with significant regional gray matter volume decreases, fractional anisotropy increases, and mean diffusivity decreases within the spinal trigeminal nucleus, specifically the subnucleus oralis. In addition, tractography revealed no significant differences in diffusivity properties in the root entry zone of the trigeminal nerve, the spinal trigeminal tract, or the ventral trigeminothalamic tracts in painful trigeminal neuropathy subjects compared with controls. These data reveal that chronic neuropathic pain in humans is associated with discrete alterations in the anatomy of the primary synapse. These neuroanatomical changes may be critical for the generation and/or maintenance of pathological pain

Different Pain, Different Brain: Thalamic Anatomy in Neuropathic and Non-Neuropathic Chronic Pain Syndromes

peer reviewedTrigeminal neuropathic pain (TNP) and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are thought to have fundamentally different etiologies. It has been proposed that TNP arises through damage to, or pressure on, somatosensory afferents in the trigeminal nerve, whereas TMD results primarily from peripheral nociceptor activation. Because some reports suggest that neuropathic pain is associated with changes in brain anatomy, it is possible that TNP is maintained by changes in higher brain structures, whereas TMD is not. The aim of this investigation is to determine whether changes in regional brain anatomy and biochemistry occur in both conditions. Twenty-one TNP subjects, 20 TMD subjects, and 36 healthy controls were recruited. Voxel-based morphometry of T1-weighted anatomical images revealed no significant regional gray matter volume change in TMD patients. In contrast, gray matter volume of TNP patients was reduced in the primary somatosensory cortex, anterior insula, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and the thalamus, whereas gray matter volume was increased in the posterior insula. The thalamic volume decrease was only seen in the TNP patients classified as having trigeminal neuropathy but not those with trigeminal neuralgia. Furthermore, in trigeminal neuropathy patients, magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed a significant reduction in the N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratio, a biochemical marker of neural viability, in the region of thalamic volume loss. The data suggest that the pathogenesis underlying neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain conditions are fundamentally different and that neuropathic pain conditions that result from peripheral injuries may be generated and/or maintained by structural changes in regions such as the thalamus

Different pain, different brain: thalamic anatomy in neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain syndromes.

peer reviewedTrigeminal neuropathic pain (TNP) and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are thought to have fundamentally different etiologies. It has been proposed that TNP arises through damage to, or pressure on, somatosensory afferents in the trigeminal nerve, whereas TMD results primarily from peripheral nociceptor activation. Because some reports suggest that neuropathic pain is associated with changes in brain anatomy, it is possible that TNP is maintained by changes in higher brain structures, whereas TMD is not. The aim of this investigation is to determine whether changes in regional brain anatomy and biochemistry occur in both conditions. Twenty-one TNP subjects, 20 TMD subjects, and 36 healthy controls were recruited. Voxel-based morphometry of T1-weighted anatomical images revealed no significant regional gray matter volume change in TMD patients. In contrast, gray matter volume of TNP patients was reduced in the primary somatosensory cortex, anterior insula, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and the thalamus, whereas gray matter volume was increased in the posterior insula. The thalamic volume decrease was only seen in the TNP patients classified as having trigeminal neuropathy but not those with trigeminal neuralgia. Furthermore, in trigeminal neuropathy patients, magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed a significant reduction in the N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratio, a biochemical marker of neural viability, in the region of thalamic volume loss. The data suggest that the pathogenesis underlying neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain conditions are fundamentally different and that neuropathic pain conditions that result from peripheral injuries may be generated and/or maintained by structural changes in regions such as the thalamus

Anatomical changes at the level of the primary synapse in neuropathic pain: evidence from the spinal trigeminal nucleus.

Accumulated evidence from experimental animal models suggests that neuronal loss within the dorsal horn is involved in the development and/or maintenance of peripheral neuropathic pain. However, to date, no study has specifically investigated whether such neuroanatomical changes also occur at this level in humans. Using brain imaging techniques, we sought to determine whether anatomical changes were present in the spinal trigeminal nucleus in subjects with chronic orofacial neuropathic pain. In 22 subjects with painful trigeminal neuropathy and 44 pain-free controls, voxel-based morphometry of T1-weighted anatomical images and diffusion tensor images were used to assess regional gray matter volume and microstructural changes within the brainstem. In addition, deterministic tractography was used to assess the integrity of ascending pain pathways. Orofacial neuropathic pain was associated with significant regional gray matter volume decreases, fractional anisotropy increases, and mean diffusivity decreases within the spinal trigeminal nucleus, specifically the subnucleus oralis. In addition, tractography revealed no significant differences in diffusivity properties in the root entry zone of the trigeminal nerve, the spinal trigeminal tract, or the ventral trigeminothalamic tracts in painful trigeminal neuropathy subjects compared with controls. These data reveal that chronic neuropathic pain in humans is associated with discrete alterations in the anatomy of the primary synapse. These neuroanatomical changes may be critical for the generation and/or maintenance of pathological pain

Pain reduction due to novel sensory-motor training in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome I – A pilot study

Background and aims Patients suffering from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) of the upper limb show a changed cortical representation of the affected hand. The lip area invades the former hand area contralateral to the affected hand. This change in cortical representation is correlated to the intensity of ongoing pain in patients with CRPS. Further studies revealed that restoration of the original representation coincides with a decrease of pain. Sensory-motor training protocols can increase and/or relocate cortical somatosensory and motor representation areas of the fingers, as shown, for example, in Braille reading individuals and professional violin players. Further, there is evidence that sensory-motor discrimination training has a beneficial effect on both the intensity of pain and the mislocalization of sensory-motor cortical areas in CRPS patients. Based on these propositions, we developed a novel sensory-motor self-training paradigm for CRPS patients to use in a home-based manner. Methods Ten CRPS patients performed the sensory-motor training for 2 weeks. The training consists of a braille-like haptic task with different training modes (bi-manual, speed and memory training). During the training, as well as 1 week before and after, patients were asked to fill out pain diaries. Furthermore, measures of impairment were acquired at baseline and post training. Results Patients showed significant pain reduction after the 2 week training period. The overall disability as well as the depression scores showed a trend to improve after the 2 week training. The reduction in pain was correlated with the total amount of training performed. Conclusions This is a first proof of principle study of a novel sensory-motor self-training protocol to reduce pain in CRPS patients. The more consistent the patients trained the larger the pain reduction. Sensory-motor training, which can be performed on a regular basis at home might provide a novel interventional strategy to improve symptoms of CRPS. Implications Although a larger study needs to be conducted to confirm our findings, including long-term follow-up, the results show, that a sensory-motor home-based training is a strategy worth exploring further for the reduction of pain as well as high frequency training for patients with CRPS

Changes in human primary motor cortex activity during acute cutaneous and muscle orofacial pain

To use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine whether orofacial cutaneous or muscle pain is associated with changes in primary motor cortex (M1) activity that outlast the duration of perceived pain, and whether these M1 changes are different during cutaneous pain compared with muscle pain. fMRI was used in healthy subjects experiencing orofacial muscle (n = 17) or cutaneous (n = 15) pain induced by bolus injections of hypertonic saline (4.5%) into the belly of the masseter muscle (0.5 ml) or subcutaneously (0.2 ml) into the overlying skin, respectively. To determine the effects of the injection volume, isotonic saline (n = 4) was injected into the masseter muscle. Similar pain scores were observed following subcutaneous (mean [± SEM]; 4.73 ± 0.51) or intramuscular injections (4.35 ± 0.56). Orofacial muscle but not cutaneous pain was associated with a transient increase in signal intensity in the contralateral M1. Cutaneous and muscle orofacial pains were associated with similar signal intensity decreases within the contralateral M1 that continued to decrease for the entire scanning period. Isotonic saline did not evoke pain or changes in M1 signal intensity. The transient contralateral M1 signal intensity increase during orofacial muscle pain may underlie escape-like motor patterns. However, once the initial threat has subsided, longer-term reductions in M1 activity and/or excitability may occur to aid in minimizing movement of the affected part, an effect consistent with the general proposals of the Pain Adaptation Model