A Multi-Center Comparison of VO2peak Trainability Between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training

There is heterogeneity in the observed VO2peak response to similar exercise training, and different exercise approaches produce variable degrees of exercise response (trainability). The aim of this study was to combine data from different laboratories to compare VO2peak trainability between various volumes of interval training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training (MICT). For interval training, volumes were classified by the duration of total interval time. High-volume High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) included studies that had participants complete more than 15 min of high intensity efforts per session. Low-volume HIIT/Sprint Interval Training (SIT) included studies using less than 15 min of high intensity efforts per session. In total, 677 participants across 18 aerobic exercise training interventions from eight different universities in five countries were included in the analysis. Participants had completed 3 weeks or more of either high-volume HIIT (n = 299), low-volume HIIT/SIT (n = 116), or MICT (n = 262) and were predominately men (n = 495) with a mix of healthy, elderly and clinical populations. Each training intervention improved mean VO2peak at the group level (P \u3c 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, high-volume HIIT had a significantly greater (P \u3c 0.05) absolute VO2peak increase (0.29 L/min) compared to MICT (0.20 L/min) and low-volume HIIT/SIT (0.18 L/min). Adjusted relative VO2peak increase was also significantly greater (P \u3c 0.01) in high-volume HIIT (3.3 ml/kg/min) than MICT (2.4 ml/kg/min) and insignificantly greater (P = 0.09) than low-volume HIIT/SIT (2.5 mL/kg/min). Based on a high threshold for a likely response (technical error of measurement plus the minimal clinically important difference), high-volume HIIT had significantly more (P \u3c 0.01) likely responders (31%) compared to low-volume HIIT/SIT (16%) and MICT (21%). Covariates such as age, sex, the individual study, population group, sessions per week, study duration and the average between pre and post VO2peak explained only 17.3% of the variance in VO2peak trainability. In conclusion, high-volume HIIT had more likely responders to improvements in VO2peak compared to low-volume HIIT/SIT and MICT

Exercise-induced cardiac troponin release in athletes with versus without coronary atherosclerosis

The magnitude of exercise-induced cardiac troponin (cTn) elevations is dependent on cardiovascular health status, and previous studies have shown that occult coronary atherosclerosis is highly prevalent among amateur athletes. We tested the hypothesis that middle-aged and older athletes with coronary atherosclerosis demonstrate greater cTn elevations following a controlled endurance exercise test compared with healthy peers. We included 59 male athletes from the Measuring Athletes' Risk of Cardiovascular events 2 (MARC-2) study and stratified them as controls [coronary artery calcium score (CACS) = 0, n = 20], high CACS [≥300 Agatston units or ≥75th Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) percentile, n = 20] or significant stenosis (≥50% in any coronary artery, n = 19). Participants performed a cycling test with incremental workload until volitional exhaustion. Serial high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn) T and I concentrations were measured (baseline, after 30-min warm-up, and 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min postexercise). There were 58 participants (61 [58-69] yr) who completed the exercise test (76 ± 14 min) with a peak heart rate of 97.7 [94.8-101.8]% of their estimated maximum. Exercise duration and workload did not differ across groups. Highsensitivity cardiac troponin T (Hs-cTnT) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) concentrations significantly increased (1.55 [1.33-2.14]-fold and 2.76 [1.89-3.86]-fold, respectively) over time, but patterns of cTn changes and the incidence of concentrations >99th percentile did not differ across groups. Serial sampling of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI concentrations during and following an exhaustive endurance exercise test did not reveal differences in exercise-induced cTn release between athletes with versus without coronary atherosclerosis. These findings suggest that a high CACS or a >50% stenosis in any coronary artery does not aggravate exercise-induced cTn release in middle-aged and older athletes

A multi-center comparison of V2peak trainability between interval training and moderate intensity continuous training

There is heterogeneity in the observed (V) over dotO(2peak) response to similar exercise training, and different exercise approaches produce variable degrees of exercise response (trainability). The aim of this study was to combine data from different laboratories to compare (V) over dotO(2peak) trainability between various volumes of interval training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training (MICT). For interval training, volumes were classified by the duration of total interval time. High-volume High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) included studies that had participants complete more than 15 min of high intensity efforts per session. Low-volume HIIT/Sprint Interval Training (SIT) included studies using less than 15 min of high intensity efforts per session. In total, 677 participants across 18 aerobic exercise training interventions from eight different universities in five countries were included in the analysis. Participants had completed 3 weeks or more of either high-volume HIIT (n = 299), low-volume HIIT/SIT (n = 116), or MICT (n = 262) and were predominately men (n = 495) with a mix of healthy, elderly and clinical populations. Each training intervention improved mean (V) over dotO(2peak) at the group level (P < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, high-volume HIIT had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) absolute (V) over dotO(2peak) increase (0.29 L/min) compared to MICT (0.20 L/min) and low-volume HIIT/SIT (0.18 L/min). Adjusted relative(V) over dotO(2peak) increase was also significantly greater (P < 0.01) in high-volume HUT (3.3 ml/kg/min) than MICT (2.4 mVkg/min) and insignificantly greater (P = 0.09) than low-volume HIIT/SIT (2.5 mUkg/min). Based on a high threshold for a likely response (technical error of measurement plus the minimal clinically important difference), high-volume HIIT had significantly more (P < 0.01) likely responders (31%) compared to low-volume HIIT/SIT (16%) and MICT (21%). Covariates such as age, sex, the individual study, population group, sessions per week, study duration and the average between pre and post (V) over dotO(2peak) explained only 17.3% of the variance in (V) over dot O-2peak trainability. In conclusion, high-volume HIIT had more likely responders to improvements in (V) over dotO(2peak) compared to low-volume HIIT/SIT and MICT