Improving Care For Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Through the Use of a Personal Electrocardiogram

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia affecting more than six million people in the United States. The economic burden is estimated to be \u3e$6 billion annually with catastrophic events dramatically increasing expenditure. When patients experience symptoms, they commonly present to an acute care facility; this can be costly and anxiety provoking. Local problem: Same-day access issues prohibit patients from communicating directly with their cardiology provider, forcing them to use resources and increasing psychological burden.Methods:A convenience sample, made up of 43 patients, was given a KardiaMobile device. Eligible patients had ≥2 AF-related emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) visits over 12 months, needed rate control with medication titration, or were monitored for AF reoccurrence after reestablishing sinus rhythm.Interventions:Patients emailed recordings daily and when experiencing symptoms. The recordings were reviewed by a nurse practitioner (NP); abnormal readings were followed by a phone call, telehealth, or in-person visit. Results: An independently designed survey was conducted online; almost all respondents (97$81,950 in reduced ED visits alone. Conclusion: A personal electrocardiogram, with NP oversight, to manage AF is cost-effective and reduces unnecessary resource utilization. It is patient centered, improves access, and empowers patients to manage their symptoms

There is a low rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in chest pain patients with a moderate risk heart score referred from urgent care for expedited outpatient cardiology evaluation: a multi-center study

Background The HEART score is an effective method of risk stratifying emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with moderate HEART score referred from an urgent care (UC) for an expedited outpatient cardiology evaluation for 11 months was described in 133 patients in a previous study. This is a follow-up study with 18 months of data and 206 patients.Aim. The primary outcome was to examine the rate of MACE when patients with moderate HEART score were referred for an expedited outpatient cardiology follow-up after evaluation in urgent care. The secondary outcome was to determine if there is a decrease in rate of ED transfer after this protocol was introduced.Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted by a multispecialty group in Las Vegas, Nevada, which included 206 patients with a HEART score of 4 to 6 (i.e.: moderate risk) who presented to one of five UC centers with chest pain or an anginal equivalent. A streamlined evaluation protocol to assess each HEART score component was adopted by all UC providers to facilitate an expedited outpatient cardiology follow-up, as an alternative to referral to the emergency department. Data was collected from February 14, 2019 through August 13, 2020. The population was followed for 6 weeks with a primary endpoint of MACE determined by electronic medical record review and direct phone contact with patients. Outcomes were confirmed in 98% of patients. Chest pain transfer data was compared between 12 months prior to implementing HEART protocol and 18 months of data analysis while using the new protocol.Results. Over the course of 18 months, 206 patients with a moderate risk HEART score were referred to outpatient cardiology in an expedited manner. The average age was 65 with 53% female and 47% male patients. 150 patients (73% of the 206) were seen within 3 days, 114 (55%) underwent stress testing, 6 (3%) had coronary computed tomography angiogram, and 6 (3%) received an invasive coronary angiogram. Five patients were found to have MACE: one patient who had a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and subsequent coronary stent, two patients were found to have obstructive disease after coronary angiography with subsequent coronary artery bypass graft, one patient had an abnormal stress test and subsequent coronary stent, and one patient had critical mitral stenosis, multi-vessel coronary artery disease and underwent coronary artery bypass graft with mitral valve replacement with complications of renal failure and COVID-19 and expired. The emergency department referral rate declined by 21%.Conclusion. Patients with a moderate risk HEART score referred from UC for an expedited outpatient cardiology evaluation had a low rate of MACE and no deaths due to delay of care. There was also a significant decrease in the rate of ED referrals.Background. The HEART score is an effective method of risk stratifying emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with moderate HEART score referred from an urgent care (UC) for an expedited outpatient cardiology evaluation for 11 months was described in 133 patients in a previous study. This is a follow-up study with 18 months of data and 206 patients.Aim. The primary outcome was to examine the rate of MACE when patients with moderate HEART score were referred for an expedited outpatient cardiology follow-up after evaluation in urgent care. The secondary outcome was to determine if there is a decrease in rate of ED transfer after this protocol was introduced.Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted by a multispecialty group in Las Vegas, Nevada, which included 206 patients with a HEART score of 4 to 6 (i.e.: moderate risk) who presented to one of five UC centers with chest pain or an anginal equivalent. A streamlined evaluation protocol to assess each HEART score component was adopted by all UC providers to facilitate an expedited outpatient cardiology follow-up, as an alternative to referral to the emergency department. Data was collected from February 14, 2019 through August 13, 2020. The population was followed for 6 weeks with a primary endpoint of MACE determined by electronic medical record review and direct phone contact with patients. Outcomes were confirmed in 98% of patients. Chest pain transfer data was compared between 12 months prior to implementing HEART protocol and 18 months of data analysis while using the new protocol.Results. Over the course of 18 months, 206 patients with a moderate risk HEART score were referred to outpatient cardiology in an expedited manner. The average age was 65 with 53% female and 47% male patients. 150 patients (73% of the 206) were seen within 3 days, 114 (55%) underwent stress testing, 6 (3%) had coronary computed tomography angiogram, and 6 (3%) received an invasive coronary angiogram. Five patients were found to have MACE: one patient who had a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and subsequent coronary stent, two patients were found to have obstructive disease after coronary angiography with subsequent coronary artery bypass graft, one patient had an abnormal stress test and subsequent coronary stent, and one patient had critical mitral stenosis, multi-vessel coronary artery disease and underwent coronary artery bypass graft with mitral valve replacement with complications of renal failure and COVID-19 and expired. The emergency department referral rate declined by 21%.Conclusion. Patients with a moderate risk HEART score referred from UC for an expedited outpatient cardiology evaluation had a low rate of MACE and no deaths due to delay of care. There was also a significant decrease in the rate of ED referrals

Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy

BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease to receive canagliflozin, an oral SGLT2 inhibitor, at a dose of 100 mg daily or placebo. All the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 to <90 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and albuminuria (ratio of albumin [mg] to creatinine [g], >300 to 5000) and were treated with renin–angiotensin system blockade. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained estimated GFR of <15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P=0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P=0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P=0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years

Omecamtiv mecarbil in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, GALACTIC‐HF: baseline characteristics and comparison with contemporary clinical trials

Aims: The safety and efficacy of the novel selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is tested in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC‐HF) trial. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants in GALACTIC‐HF and how these compare with other contemporary trials. Methods and Results: Adults with established HFrEF, New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA) ≥ II, EF ≤35%, elevated natriuretic peptides and either current hospitalization for HF or history of hospitalization/ emergency department visit for HF within a year were randomized to either placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil (pharmacokinetic‐guided dosing: 25, 37.5 or 50 mg bid). 8256 patients [male (79%), non‐white (22%), mean age 65 years] were enrolled with a mean EF 27%, ischemic etiology in 54%, NYHA II 53% and III/IV 47%, and median NT‐proBNP 1971 pg/mL. HF therapies at baseline were among the most effectively employed in contemporary HF trials. GALACTIC‐HF randomized patients representative of recent HF registries and trials with substantial numbers of patients also having characteristics understudied in previous trials including more from North America (n = 1386), enrolled as inpatients (n = 2084), systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg (n = 1127), estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 528), and treated with sacubitril‐valsartan at baseline (n = 1594). Conclusions: GALACTIC‐HF enrolled a well‐treated, high‐risk population from both inpatient and outpatient settings, which will provide a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy, as well as informing its potential future implementation

There is a low rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in chest pain patients with a moderate risk heart score referred from urgent care for expedited outpatient cardiology evaluation: a multi-center study

Background The HEART score is an effective method of risk stratifying emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with moderate HEART score referred from an urgent care (UC) for an expedited outpatient cardiology evaluation for 11 months was described in 133 patients in a previous study. This is a follow-up study with 18 months of data and 206 patients. Aim. The primary outcome was to examine the rate of MACE when patients with moderate HEART score were referred for an expedited outpatient cardiology follow-up after evaluation in urgent care. The secondary outcome was to determine if there is a decrease in rate of ED transfer after this protocol was introduced. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted by a multispecialty group in Las Vegas, Nevada, which included 206 patients with a HEART score of 4 to 6 (i.e.: moderate risk) who presented to one of five UC centers with chest pain or an anginal equivalent. A streamlined evaluation protocol to assess each HEART score component was adopted by all UC providers to facilitate an expedited outpatient cardiology follow-up, as an alternative to referral to the emergency department. Data was collected from February 14, 2019 through August 13, 2020. The population was followed for 6 weeks with a primary endpoint of MACE determined by electronic medical record review and direct phone contact with patients. Outcomes were confirmed in 98% of patients. Chest pain transfer data was compared between 12 months prior to implementing HEART protocol and 18 months of data analysis while using the new protocol. Results. Over the course of 18 months, 206 patients with a moderate risk HEART score were referred to outpatient cardiology in an expedited manner. The average age was 65 with 53% female and 47% male patients. 150 patients (73% of the 206) were seen within 3 days, 114 (55%) underwent stress testing, 6 (3%) had coronary computed tomography angiogram, and 6 (3%) received an invasive coronary angiogram. Five patients were found to have MACE: one patient who had a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and subsequent coronary stent, two patients were found to have obstructive disease after coronary angiography with subsequent coronary artery bypass graft, one patient had an abnormal stress test and subsequent coronary stent, and one patient had critical mitral stenosis, multi-vessel coronary artery disease and underwent coronary artery bypass graft with mitral valve replacement with complications of renal failure and COVID-19 and expired. The emergency department referral rate declined by 21%. Conclusion. Patients with a moderate risk HEART score referred from UC for an expedited outpatient cardiology evaluation had a low rate of MACE and no deaths due to delay of care. There was also a significant decrease in the rate of ED referrals

Improving care for patients with atrial fibrillation through the use of a personal electrocardiogram

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia affecting more than six million people in the United States. The economic burden is estimated to be \u3e$6 billion annually with catastrophic events dramatically increasing expenditure. When patients experience symptoms, they commonly present to an acute care facility; this can be costly and anxiety provoking. Local problem: Same-day access issues prohibit patients from communicating directly with their cardiology provider, forcing them to use resources and increasing psychological burden.Methods:A convenience sample, made up of 43 patients, was given a KardiaMobile device. Eligible patients had ≥2 AF-related emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) visits over 12 months, needed rate control with medication titration, or were monitored for AF reoccurrence after reestablishing sinus rhythm.Interventions:Patients emailed recordings daily and when experiencing symptoms. The recordings were reviewed by a nurse practitioner (NP); abnormal readings were followed by a phone call, telehealth, or in-person visit. Results: An independently designed survey was conducted online; almost all respondents (97$81,950 in reduced ED visits alone. Conclusion: A personal electrocardiogram, with NP oversight, to manage AF is cost-effective and reduces unnecessary resource utilization. It is patient centered, improves access, and empowers patients to manage their symptoms

Effects of Physical Prehabilitation on the Dynamics of the Markers of Endothelial Function in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Bypass Surgery

Our aim in this study was to evaluate the effect of physical training performed before CABG on the perioperative dynamics of the serum levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) of patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). Patients in the preoperative period were randomized into two groups: the training group (n = 43) underwent high-intensity treadmill training; the patients in the control group (n = 35) received no training before the procedure. The serum concentrations of ADMA and ET-1 were determined in the perioperative period, and the course of the early postoperative period was analyzed. In the training group, we found a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications during hospital stays (p = 0.013). At the end of the training program, the ADMA levels were 1.8 times higher in the controls than in the training group (p = 0.001). We found that type 2 diabetes increased the probability of complications by 12 times (OR: 12.3; 95% CI: 1.24–121.5; p = 0.03), as well as elevating the concentration of ET-1 on the eve of surgery (OR: 10.7; 95% CI: 1.4–81.3; p = 0.02). Physical prehabilitation reduced the likelihood of complications nine times (OR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02–0.83; p = 0.03). The AUC was 0.851 ± 0.07 (95% CI: 0.71–0.98). The obtained results indicate the benefit of physical training during the prehabilitation stage since it can help to preserve endothelial function

Factors determining the readiness of a patient with coronary artery disease to use telemedicine technologies for rehabilitation: prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Despite its relevance and established efficiency, the third stage of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) lacks a universal solution. The longest rehabilitation period requires many resources and effort on the part of the healthcare system. Digital technologies rapidly developing and being introduced into medicine can significantly assist in organizing the CR process. The healthcare system is already mastered and actively adopting telemedicine technologies into daily practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the patients’ preparedness for the upcoming surgical treatment of the chronic types of coronary artery disease to engage in remote cardiac rehabilitation programs using telemedicine technologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study of 213 patients treated for artery disease and preparing for planned coronary bypass surgery was conducted. Gender, age, socioeconomic factors, and digital literacy were analyzed. The patients were offered one of two options for completing the third stage of CR: a standard option in which CR is performed under the supervision of a medical worker in a medical organization at the place of residence according to the recommendations received upon hospital discharge or an alternative in which CR is performed at home using remote monitoring under the supervision of specialists from the CR laboratory of the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. Patients were divided into two groups based on their choice: those who agreed to participate in the outpatient stage of CR using telemedicine technologies (loyal patients) and those who refused to use telemedicine technologies (nonloyal patients). The factors indicating more loyalty were identified using survey data and correlation analysis, and a portrait of a patient eager to use remote rehabilitation programs was formed. RESULTS: Social factors, such as living in big cities (p 0.001) and having a spouse (p=0,030), were associated with increased loyalty to participating in CR via telemedicine technologies. Male gender (p 0.001), obesity (p 0.001), and smoking (p 0.001) were associated with the reluctance to participate in the alternative CR program. The education level (p=0.060) did not show a significant impact on the loyalty to use telemedicine technologies. CONCLUSION: 46% of patients were interested in using remotely controlled CR programs. The social factors determine the loyalty to telemedicine technologies in patients