Results of the second evaluation of matching tools

meilicke2012bThis deliverable reports on the results of the second SEALS evaluation campaign (for WP12 it is the third evaluation campaign), which has been carried out in coordination with the OAEI 2011.5 campaign. Opposed to OAEI 2010 and 2011 the full set of OAEI tracks has been executed with the help of SEALS technology. 19 systems have participated and five data sets have been used. Two of these data sets are new and have not been used in previous OAEI campaigns. In this deliverable we report on the data sets used in the campaign, the execution of the campaign, and we present and discuss the evaluation results

Results of the second evaluation of matching tools

meilicke2012bThis deliverable reports on the results of the second SEALS evaluation campaign (for WP12 it is the third evaluation campaign), which has been carried out in coordination with the OAEI 2011.5 campaign. Opposed to OAEI 2010 and 2011 the full set of OAEI tracks has been executed with the help of SEALS technology. 19 systems have participated and five data sets have been used. Two of these data sets are new and have not been used in previous OAEI campaigns. In this deliverable we report on the data sets used in the campaign, the execution of the campaign, and we present and discuss the evaluation results

Final results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2011

euzenat2011dInternational audienceOntology matching consists of finding correspondences between entities of two ontologies. OAEI campaigns aim at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. Test cases can use ontologies of different nature (from simple directories to expressive OWL ontologies) and use different modalities, e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, consensus. OAEI-2011 builds over previous campaigns by having 4 tracks with 6 test cases followed by 18 participants. Since 2010, the campaign introduces a new evaluation modality in association with the SEALS project. A subset of OAEI test cases is included in this new modality which provides more automation to the evaluation and more direct feedback to the participants. This paper is an overall presentation of the OAEI 2011 campaign

Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2009

euzenat2009cInternational audienceOntology matching consists of finding correspondences between on- tology entities. OAEI campaigns aim at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. Test cases can use ontologies of different nature (from expressive OWL ontologies to simple directories) and use different modal- ities, e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, consensus. OAEI-2009 builds over previous campaigns by having 5 tracks with 11 test cases followed by 16 partici- pants. This paper is an overall presentation of the OAEI 2009 campaign

Pattern-based ontology transformation service

zamazal2009bInternational audienceMany use cases for semantic technologies (eg. reasoning, modularisation, matching) could benefit from an ontology transformation service. This service is supported with ontology transformation patterns consisting of corresponding ontology patterns capturing alternative modelling choices, and an alignment between them. In this paper we present the transformation process together with its two constituents: a pattern detection and an ontology transformation process. The pattern detection process is based on SPARQL and the transformation process is based on an ontology alignment representation with specific extensions regarding detailed information about the transformation

Preliminary results of logical ontology pattern detection using SPARQL and lexical heuristics

scharffe2009bInternational audienceOntology design patterns were proposed in order to assist the ontology engineering task, providing models of specific construction representing a particular form of knowledge. Various kinds of patterns have since been introduced and classes of patterns identified. Detecting these patterns in existing ontologies is needed in various scenarios, for example the detection of the the two parts of an alignment pattern in an ontology matching scenario, or the detection of an anti-pattern in an optimization scenario. In this paper we present a novel method for the detection of logical patterns in ontologies. This method is based on both SPARQL, as the underlying language for retrieving patterns, and a lexical heuristic constraining the query. It extends our previous works on ontology patterns modeling and detection. We describe an algorithm computing a tokenbased similarity measure used as the lexical heuristic. We conduct an experiment on a large number of Web ontologies, obtaining interesting measures on the usage frequency of three selected patterns

Towards metamorphic semantic models

zamazal2009aInternational audienceOntological model transformation inside the OWL formalism, preserving the intended meaning across modelling styles, could support diverse kinds of semantic web applications. Three use cases are mentioned, which could share a single ontology transformation service based on a transformation pattern library. We discuss the ontology matching use case in more detail and illustrate on a simple example

Towards metamorphic semantic models

zamazal2009aInternational audienceOntological model transformation inside the OWL formalism, preserving the intended meaning across modelling styles, could support diverse kinds of semantic web applications. Three use cases are mentioned, which could share a single ontology transformation service based on a transformation pattern library. We discuss the ontology matching use case in more detail and illustrate on a simple example

Results of the first evaluation of matching tools

trojahn2010dThis deliverable reports the results of the first SEALS evaluation campaign, which has been carried out in coordination with the OAEI 2010 campaign. A subset of the OAEI tracks has been included in a new modality, the SEALS modality. From the participant's point of view, the main innovation is the use of a web-based interface for launching evaluations. 13 systems, out of 15 for all tracks, have participated in some of the three SEALS tracks. We report the preliminary results of these systems for each SEALS track and discuss the main lesson learned from to the use of the new technology for both participants and organizers of the OAEI