Cannabidiol as a treatment for craving and relapse in individuals with cocaine use disorder : a randomized placebo‐controlled trial

Background and Aims Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a significant public health concern for which no efficacious pharmacological interventions are available. Cannabidiol (CBD) has attracted considerable interest as a promising treatment for addiction. This study tested CBD efficacy for reducing craving and preventing relapse in people with CUD. Design Single site double‐blind randomized controlled superiority trial comparing CBD with placebo. Setting Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Canada. Participants Seventy‐eight adults (14 women) with moderate to severe CUD participated. Intervention Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by stratified blocks to daily 800 mg CBD (n=40) or placebo (n=38). They first underwent an inpatient detoxification phase lasting 10 days. Those who completed this phase entered a 12‐week outpatient follow‐up. Measurements Primary outcomes were drug‐cue induced craving during detoxication and time‐to‐cocaine relapse during subsequent outpatient treatment. Findings During drug‐cue exposure, craving scores (mean ± SD) increased from baseline by 4.69 (2.89) versus 3.21 (2.78) points respectively in CBD (n=36) and placebo (n=28) participants (CI = ‐0.33 to 3.04; p = 0.069; Bayes factor = 0.498). All but three participants relapsed to cocaine by week 12 with similar risk for CBD (n=34) and placebo (n=27) participants (Hazard Ratio =1.20, CI=0.65 to 2.20, p=0.51; Bayes factor = 0.152). CBD treatment was well tolerated and associated mainly with diarrhea. Conclusions Cannabidiol did not reduce cocaine craving or relapse among people being treated for cocaine use disorder

Comorbid Depression Among Untreated Illicit Opiate Users : Results From a Multisite Canadian Study

This study aimed to describe patterns of major depression (MDD) in a cohort of untreated illicit opiate users recruited from 5 Canadian urban centres, identify sociodemographic characteristics of opiate users that predict MDD, and determine whether opiate users suffering from depression exhibit different drug use patterns than do participants without depression. Baseline data were collected from 679 untreated opiate users in Vancouver, Edmonton, Toronto, Montreal, and Quebec City. Using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form for Major Depression, we assessed sociodemographics, drug use, health status, health service use, and depression. We examined depression rates across study sites; logistic regression analyses predicted MDD from demographic information and city. Chi-square analyses were used to compare injection drug use and cocaine or crack use among participants with and without depression. Almost one-half (49.3%) of the sample met the cut-off score for MDD. Being female, white, and living outside Vancouver independently predicted MDD. Opiate users suffering from depression were more likely than users without depression to share injection equipment and paraphernalia and were also more likely to use cocaine (Ps < 0.05). Comorbid depression is common among untreated opiate users across Canada; targeted interventions are needed for this population

Determinants of antiviral treatment initiation in a hepatitis C-infected population benefiting from universal health care coverage

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In view of increasing therapeutic efficacy, the delivery of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral treatment is expected to increase. Yet practical experience reveals a low rate of treatment, particularly among intravenous drug users. The aim of the present study was to examine the prevalence of HCV treatment and identify factors associated with HCV treatment in a population of patients evaluated in an academic hepatology outpatient clinic between 2001 and 2002

Les troubles liés à l’utilisation des opioïdes prescrits médicalement

Épidémiologie Au cours des 10 à 15 dernières années, le Canada est devenu le deuxième plus grand consommateur d’opioïdes de prescription (OP), principalement pour le traitement de la douleur. Cette augmentation a été plus marquée chez les 55 ans et plus. Même si personne ne conteste le droit des patients à recevoir des traitements adéquats pour la douleur, il n’en demeure pas moins que cette disponibilité accrue a entraîné son lot de problèmes : augmentation des visites à l’urgence et des décès liés aux opioïdes ainsi que du trouble lié à l’utilisation (TLU) des opioïdes, trouble qui est d’ailleurs associé à une prévalence accrue, de l’ordre de 40 %, de divers problèmes psychiatriques, dont les troubles dépressifs majeurs.Neuroscience De nouvelles connaissances issues des neurosciences nous permettent de mieux comprendre la réaction du cerveau lors de l’exposition à ces substances et le caractère chronique du TLU des opioïdes. Quoique historiquement perçu comme une faiblesse de caractère ou un vice, le TLU des opioïdes est maintenant reconnu comme une condition chronique résultant d’une interaction complexe entre une substance, des facteurs d’environnement et un génotype individuel. Malheureusement, ces évidences scientifiques ne sont pas encore largement appliquées à la clinique et la majorité des médecins n’ont pas les habiletés nécessaires pour diagnostiquer et traiter le TLU des opioïdes.Guides de pratique clinique Des recommandations et guides de pratique peuvent nous aider à identifier les personnes plus vulnérables à un mésusage, et à mieux encadrer la prescription et la gestion de la médication. Il ne s’agit pas de se désintéresser de ces patients et de les abandonner à leur sort mais plutôt de leur offrir des soins inspirés des meilleures pratiques et appuyés sur des évidences scientifiques de qualité.Epidemiology Canada now has the second highest number of opioid prescriptions per capita in the world. The rate of prescriptions has increased over the last decade, most notably in adults over 55 years of age. A recognition of the importance of treating pain has influenced this increase, but higher rates of opioid prescribing have produced undesirable outcomes including the misuse of medication as well as an increased number of deaths and emergency department visits attributable to opioids. Diverse psychiatric disorders, such as major depression, now also occur in 40% of those with an opioid use disorder (OUD).Neuroscience We now understand that addictive behaviors are caused by both environmental and genetic factors. Although OUD has historically been perceived as a weakness of character, it is now clear that it is a chronic disease, which results from a complex interaction between a substance, such as opioid, environmental factors, and an individual’s genotype. Unfortunately, this evidence has yet to be successfully translated into clinical practice and most physicians are unable to diagnose and manage OUD patients appropriately.Clinical guidelines Many clinical guidelines for the management of chronic, non-cancer pain are available. All guidelines identify the need to assess the patient appropriately and screen for factors associated with misuse before prescribing opioids. Guidelines generally acknowledge that patients should not be denied appropriate pain management, but that some patients will require close supervision and frequent follow-up to prevent the misuse of prescription opioids

Client satisfaction among participants in a randomized trial comparing oral methadone and injectable diacetylmorphine for long-term opioid-dependency

Background: Substitution with opioid-agonists (e.g., methadone) has shown to be an effective treatment for chronic long-term opioid dependency. Patient satisfaction with treatment has been associated with improved addiction treatment outcomes. However, there is a paucity of studies evaluating patients' satisfaction with Opioid Substitution Treatment (OST). In the present study, participants' satisfaction with OST was evaluated at 3 and 12 months. We sought to test the relationship between satisfaction and patients' characteristics, the treatment modality received and treatment outcomes. Methods Data from a randomized controlled trial, the North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI), conducted in Vancouver and Montreal (Canada) between 2005-2008, was analyzed. The NAOMI study compared the effectiveness of oral methadone vs. injectable diacetylmorphine over 12 months. A small sub-group of patients received injectable hydromorphone on a double blind basis with diacetylmorphine. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) was used to measure satisfaction with treatment. CSQ-8 scores, as well as retention and response to treatment, did not differ between those receiving hydromorphone and diacetylmorphine at 3 or 12 months assessments; therefore, these two groups were analyzed together as the 'injectable' treatment group. Results A total of 232 (92%) and 237 (94%) participants completed the CSQ-8 at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Participants in both groups were highly satisfied with treatment. Independent of treatment group, participants satisfied with treatment at 3 months were more likely to be retained at 12 months. Multivariate analysis indicated that satisfaction was greater among those randomized to the injection group after controlling for treatment effectiveness. Participants who were retained, responded to treatment, and had fewer psychological symptoms were more satisfied with treatment. Finally, open-ended comments were made by 149 (60.3%) participants; concerns about the randomization process and the study ending were most commonly reported by participants receiving the oral and injectable medications, respectively. Conclusions The higher satisfaction among those receiving medically prescribed injectable diacetylmorphine (or hydromorphone) supports current evidence regarding the attractiveness of this treatment for long-term, opioid-dependent individuals not benefiting sufficiently from other treatments. In addition, the measurement of treatment satisfaction provides valuable information about participants at risk of relapse and in need of additional services. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00175357Population and Public Health (SPPH), School ofNon UBCMedicine, Faculty ofReviewedFacult

Sex work involvement among women with long-term opioid injection drug dependence who enter opioid agonist treatment

Background: Substitution with opioid-agonists (e.g., methadone) has shown to be an effective treatment for chronic long-term opioid dependency. Survival sex work, very common among injection drug users, has been associated with poor Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) engagement, retention and response. Therefore, this study was undertaken to determine factors associated with engaging in sex work among long-term opioid dependent women receiving OAT. Methods Data from a randomized controlled trial, the North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI), conducted in Vancouver and Montreal (Canada) between 2005-2008, was analyzed. The NAOMI study compared the effectiveness of oral methadone to injectable diacetylmorphine or injectable hydromorphone, the last two on a double blind basis, over 12 months. A research team, independent of the clinic services, obtained outcome evaluations at baseline and follow-up (3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months). Results A total 53.6% of women reported engaging in sex work in at least one of the research visits. At treatment initiation, women who were younger and had fewer years of education were more likely to be engaged in sex work. The multivariate logistic generalized estimating equation regression analysis determined that psychological symptoms, and high illicit heroin and cocaine use correlated with women's involvement in sex work during the study period. Conclusions After entering OAT, women using injection drugs and engaging in sex work represent a particularly vulnerable group showing poorer psychological health and a higher use of heroin and cocaine compared to women not engaging in sex work. These factors must be taken into consideration in the planning and provision of OAT in order to improve treatment outcomes. Trial Registration NCT00175357.Population and Public Health (SPPH), School ofNon UBCMedicine, Faculty ofReviewedFacult