Avoid or Embrace? Practice Effects in Alzheimer's Disease Prevention Trials

Demonstrating a slowing in the rate of cognitive decline is a common outcome measure in clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Selection of cognitive endpoints typically includes modeling candidate outcome measures in the many, richly phenotyped observational cohort studies available. An important part of choosing cognitive endpoints is a consideration of improvements in performance due to repeated cognitive testing (termed “practice effects”). As primary and secondary AD prevention trials are comprised predominantly of cognitively unimpaired participants, practice effects may be substantial and may have considerable impact on detecting cognitive change. The extent to which practice effects in AD prevention trials are similar to those from observational studies and how these potential differences impact trials is unknown. In the current study, we analyzed data from the recently completed DIAN-TU-001 clinical trial (TU) and the associated DIAN-Observational (OBS) study. Results indicated that asymptomatic mutation carriers in the TU exhibited persistent practice effects on several key outcomes spanning the entire trial duration. Critically, these practice related improvements were larger on certain tests in the TU relative to matched participants from the OBS study. Our results suggest that the magnitude of practice effects may not be captured by modeling potential endpoints in observational studies where assessments are typically less frequent and drug expectancy effects are absent. Using alternate instrument forms (represented in our study by computerized tasks) may partly mitigate practice effects in clinical trials but incorporating practice effects as outcomes may also be viable. Thus, investigators must carefully consider practice effects (either by minimizing them or modeling them directly) when designing cognitive endpoint AD prevention trials by utilizing trial data with similar assessment frequencies

Longitudinal head-to-head comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir PET in a Phase 2/3 clinical trial of anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease

International audiencePurpose: Pittsburgh Compound-B (11C-PiB) and 18F-florbetapir are amyloid-β (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers that have been used as endpoints in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies. However, comparing drug effects between and within trials may become complicated if different Aβ radiotracers were used. To study the consequences of using different Aβ radiotracers to measure Aβ clearance, we performed a head-to-head comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir in a Phase 2/3 clinical trial of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies.Methods: Sixty-six mutation-positive participants enrolled in the gantenerumab and placebo arms of the first Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit clinical trial (DIAN-TU-001) underwent both 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir PET imaging at baseline and during at least one follow-up visit. For each PET scan, regional standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs), regional Centiloids, a global cortical SUVR, and a global cortical Centiloid value were calculated. Longitudinal changes in SUVRs and Centiloids were estimated using linear mixed models. Differences in longitudinal change between PET radiotracers and between drug arms were estimated using paired and Welch two sample t-tests, respectively. Simulated clinical trials were conducted to evaluate the consequences of some research sites using 11C-PiB while other sites use 18F-florbetapir for Aβ PET imaging.Results: In the placebo arm, the absolute rate of longitudinal change measured by global cortical 11C-PiB SUVRs did not differ from that of global cortical 18F-florbetapir SUVRs. In the gantenerumab arm, global cortical 11C-PiB SUVRs decreased more rapidly than global cortical 18F-florbetapir SUVRs. Drug effects were statistically significant across both Aβ radiotracers. In contrast, the rates of longitudinal change measured in global cortical Centiloids did not differ between Aβ radiotracers in either the placebo or gantenerumab arms, and drug effects remained statistically significant. Regional analyses largely recapitulated these global cortical analyses. Across simulated clinical trials, type I error was higher in trials where both Aβ radiotracers were used versus trials where only one Aβ radiotracer was used. Power was lower in trials where 18F-florbetapir was primarily used versus trials where 11C-PiB was primarily used.Conclusion: Gantenerumab treatment induces longitudinal changes in Aβ PET, and the absolute rates of these longitudinal changes differ significantly between Aβ radiotracers. These differences were not seen in the placebo arm, suggesting that Aβ-clearing treatments may pose unique challenges when attempting to compare longitudinal results across different Aβ radiotracers. Our results suggest converting Aβ PET SUVR measurements to Centiloids (both globally and regionally) can harmonize these differences without losing sensitivity to drug effects. Nonetheless, until consensus is achieved on how to harmonize drug effects across radiotracers, and since using multiple radiotracers in the same trial may increase type I error, multisite studies should consider potential variability due to different radiotracers when interpreting Aβ PET biomarker data and, if feasible, use a single radiotracer for the best results

Solanezumab in- depth outcomes

BackgroundSolanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting soluble forms of β- amyloid protein important in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer- s disease (AD). Three previous 18- month double- blind placebo- controlled trials of low- dose solanezumab in late- onset sporadic AD found inconsistent benefits on cognitive and functional assessments. Dominantly- inherited mutation- associated AD subjects both before and after onset of symptoms form an ideal population to study potential benefits of solanezumab therapy.MethodMutation- carrying asymptomatic (CDR 0, N=41) or mildly symptomatic (CDR 0.5 - 1, N=28) patients were treated for a minimum of 4 years and up to 7 years in a double- blind 3 to 1 active versus placebo randomized clinical trial that measured disease progression by clinical, neuropsychological and biomarker evaluations. The trial was initiated with a dose of 400 mg every 4 weeks and escalated to 1600 mg when low dose trials in sporadic AD did not meet their primary endpoints. The primary cognitive outcome measure was DIAN- MCE, composed of Delayed Recall Score of the International Shopping List Test, the Delayed Recall score of the Logical Memory IIa subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scale- Revised, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test total score from the WAIS- R and the MMSE total score. Secondary outcomes included a battery of other cognitive and functional measures. The study was powered to detect delay of cognitive disease progression in the DIAN- MCE. Biomarkers include imaging modalities (volumetric MRI, FDG, amyloid and Tau PET). CSF markers included β- amyloid, Tau and PhosphoTau species. NfL was measured in both CSF and plasma. The study used a pre- specified Bayesian multivariate disease progression model, which included dynamic borrowing of control subjects from the DIAN Observational study.ResultThe topline efficacy, safety and biomarker results will be reported.ConclusionThis study provides the first test of targeting soluble abeta forms in DIAD. It addresses the efficacy of early initiation of higher doses of solanezumab targeting soluble forms of amyloid as a disease modifying therapy. While these results are specific to DIAD, they have the potential to inform the application of anti- amyloid therapy in sporadic AD.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163859/1/alz038028.pd

Gantenerumab in- depth outcomes

BackgroundGantenerumab is a humanized anti- amyloid- beta monoclonal antibody in clinical development for the treatment of several stages of Alzheimer disease (AD). Gantenerumab was evaluated in a phase 2/3 clinical trial program designed to evaluate its efficacy in autosomal dominant AD based on a combination of clinical and biomarker evidence.MethodThe study enrolled both mutation carriers (n=69 with 3:1 randomization of treatment (n=52) vs placebo (n=17)) and non- carriers (n=28, all on placebo) from 15 years before to 10 years after the expected age of onset inclusive. Patients were both asymptomatic (CDR 0 and MMSE >25) and symptomatic (CDR 0.5- 1 and MMSE >16). There were 41 asymptomatic and 28 symptomatic mutation carriers. The initial dose of gantenerumab was 225 mg monthly administered subcutaneously. The dose was titrated to 1200 mg/month following a protocol amendment based on the increased amyloid lowering seen at higher doses in the gantenerumab program in symptomatic AD. The treatment duration was a minimum of 4 years (range 48- 80 months). The primary outcome was change from baseline in the DIAN- TU multivariate cognitive endpoint. Secondary clinical outcomes included the DIAN- TU cognitive composite, Cogstate multivariate cognitive endpoint, CDR SB, and time to CDR progression of >0.5 points. Change from baseline in amyloid PET was the primary biomarker outcome. Other biomarker outcomes included MRI, tau PET, CSF amyloid, tau and phosphotau, and CSF and plasma neurofilament light (NfL). Safety outcomes including ARIA were compared between drug and placebo groups.ResultWe will report change from baseline on the DIAN- TU multivariate cognitive endpoint, DIAN- TU cognitive composite, CDR- SB and other secondary efficacy endpoints. We expect significant lowering on amyloid PET with PIB and florbetapir based on the results from recent anti- amyloid antibodies, including Gantenerumab, in sporadic AD. We will also present the results of change in other key imaging and fluid biomarkers. The frequency, duration, and severity of ARIA will be reported and compared with studies in sporadic AD.ConclusionThis clinical trial was designed to inform future for ADAD and will provide new insights on the role of amyloid reduction in both pre- symptomatic and clinical AD.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163780/1/alz038049.pd

Longitudinal head-to-head comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir PET in a Phase 2/3 clinical trial of anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease

Purpose: Pittsburgh Compound-B (11C-PiB) and 18F-florbetapir are amyloid-β (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers that have been used as endpoints in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies. However, comparing drug effects between and within trials may become complicated if different Aβ radiotracers were used. To study the consequences of using different Aβ radiotracers to measure Aβ clearance, we performed a head-to-head comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir in a Phase 2/3 clinical trial of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies. Methods: Sixty-six mutation-positive participants enrolled in the gantenerumab and placebo arms of the first Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit clinical trial (DIAN-TU-001) underwent both 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir PET imaging at baseline and during at least one follow-up visit. For each PET scan, regional standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs), regional Centiloids, a global cortical SUVR, and a global cortical Centiloid value were calculated. Longitudinal changes in SUVRs and Centiloids were estimated using linear mixed models. Differences in longitudinal change between PET radiotracers and between drug arms were estimated using paired and Welch two sample t-tests, respectively. Simulated clinical trials were conducted to evaluate the consequences of some research sites using 11C-PiB while other sites use 18F-florbetapir for Aβ PET imaging. Results: In the placebo arm, the absolute rate of longitudinal change measured by global cortical 11C-PiB SUVRs did not differ from that of global cortical 18F-florbetapir SUVRs. In the gantenerumab arm, global cortical 11C-PiB SUVRs decreased more rapidly than global cortical 18F-florbetapir SUVRs. Drug effects were statistically significant across both Aβ radiotracers. In contrast, the rates of longitudinal change measured in global cortical Centiloids did not differ between Aβ radiotracers in either the placebo or gantenerumab arms, and drug effects remained statistically significant. Regional analyses largely recapitulated these global cortical analyses. Across simulated clinical trials, type I error was higher in trials where both Aβ radiotracers were used versus trials where only one Aβ radiotracer was used. Power was lower in trials where 18F-florbetapir was primarily used versus trials where 11C-PiB was primarily used. Conclusion: Gantenerumab treatment induces longitudinal changes in Aβ PET, and the absolute rates of these longitudinal changes differ significantly between Aβ radiotracers. These differences were not seen in the placebo arm, suggesting that Aβ-clearing treatments may pose unique challenges when attempting to compare longitudinal results across different Aβ radiotracers. Our results suggest converting Aβ PET SUVR measurements to Centiloids (both globally and regionally) can harmonize these differences without losing sensitivity to drug effects. Nonetheless, until consensus is achieved on how to harmonize drug effects across radiotracers, and since using multiple radiotracers in the same trial may increase type I error, multisite studies should consider potential variability due to different radiotracers when interpreting Aβ PET biomarker data and, if feasible, use a single radiotracer for the best results

Overview of dominantly inherited AD and top- line DIAN- TU results of solanezumab and gantenerumab

BackgroundAlzheimer- s disease (AD) prevention trials aim to intervene prior to significant neuronal loss, brain damage, and symptom onset to delay or slow cognitive decline. In dominantly inherited AD (DIAD), mutation carriers develop symptomatic AD at predictable ages with near 100% penetrance. In 2012, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit Adaptive Prevention Trial (DIAN- TU APT) platform launched a double- blind, randomized, placebo- controlled, parallel group trial of two anti- amyloid- beta monoclonal antibodies with two different antigenic targets, gantenerumab and solanezumab (NCT01760005). The DIAN- TU scientific development, implementation of the first AD prevention trial, trial challenges and opportunities, including dose escalation, and top- line results will be presented.MethodDIAN was established in 2008 in response to a call from the National Institute of Aging to establish a network to study DIAD and enable future clinical trials. Successive breakthroughs in understanding disease processes enabled the launch of the DIAN- TU adaptive prevention trial, a global adaptive platform trial supporting testing multiple drugs in parallel. The DIAN- TU partners include patients and families at risk for DIAD, global academic researchers, the NIH, Alzheimer- s Association, philanthropic supporters, the DIAN- TU Pharma Consortium, and pharmaceutical companies with drugs being tested. Important milestones include developing a platform to enable a comprehensive efficient treatment trial for this rare population, adding tau PET as part of AMP AD, adapting dosing mid- trial and extending the original biomarker trial to continue randomized dosing to test a cognitive endpoint until the last patient reaches 4 years, developing a disease progression statistical model and inclusion of DIAN observational data to increase the power to determine drug effects.ResultThe primary and key secondary outcomes of the DIAN- TU trial will be presented for each therapy in the context of targeting amyloid- beta at pre- clinical and clinically symptomatic stages of disease.ConclusionThese results inform about AD hypotheses, timing of treatment and the prospect of slowing, or preventing AD in DIAD and sporadic AD.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163864/1/alz041129.pd