The role of pacC in Aspergillus flavus

Many microorganisms, and in particular fungi, are able to grow over a wide pH range. Thus, these microorganisms must possess some regulatory mechanism or system that senses the environmental pH signal and ensures that gene expression of certain molecules is tailored to the pH of the environment (Penalva and Arst, 2002). In Aspergillus species and several other fungi, pH regulation is mediated by seven genes viz. palA, palB, palC, palF, palH, palI and the global pH regulatory gene, pacC (MacAbe et al, 1996; Negrete-Urtasun, 1999; Denison, 2000). The activated form of the PacC protein activates genes that are required at alkaline pH, e.g. genes coding for alkaline phosphatases, and represses certain genes that are functional at acidic pH, e.g. genes encoding acid phosphatases (Negrete-Urtasun, 1999). PacC (and its homologues) also positively regulates genes involved in penicillin biosynthesis, e.g. the isopenicillin N synthase gene, ipnA, in A. nidulans (Penalva and Arst, 2002). It has also been hypothesised that pacC may negatively regulate aflatoxin biosynthesis, a carcinogenic secondary metabolite in several species of Aspergillus (Keller et al, 1997). To elucidate the role of pacC a novel method of post-transcriptional gene silencing known as RNA interference was utilized. This method involved the cloning of a partial pacC gene fragment first in the forward and then the reverse orientations in a fungal expression cassette to create an RNA interference (RNAi) vector. The unique structure of this vector would allow the cloned fragments to be expressed and the resulting RNA to immediately form a double stranded stem-loop structure or short hairpin RNA (shRNA; McDonald et al, 2005). The formation of this shRNA, in turn, would be responsible for activating the endogenous RNA degradation complexes that would lead to mRNA degradation and subsequent gene silencing (Liu et al, 2003; Kadotoni et al, 2003; McDonald et al, 2005). The results presented here have shown that confirmed pacC RNAi mutants produced aflatoxins irrespective of environmental pH (i.e. the mutants produce aflatoxins under acidic and alkaline conditions). Thus, pacC is essential for pH regulation of aflatoxin production in A. flavus. There are numerous other biological (e.g. presence of oxylipins, lipooxygenases) and non-biological factors (pH, carbon source etc.) which affect maize colonisation and aflatoxin production by A. flavus (Burrow et al, 1996; Wilson et al, 2001; Calvo et al; 2002; Tsitsigiannis et al, 2006). However, all the genetic mechanisms involved have as yet not been identified. It has been shown by Caracuel et al (2003) that pacC acts as a negative virulence regulator in plants and these workers have hypothesised that PacC prevents expression of genes that are important for infection and virulence of the pathogen. Therefore the physiological effects that pacC silencing had on the growth, conidiation and pathogenicity of A. flavus mutants were also investigated. The results of this study showed that pacC does not play a significant role in primary growth and development but does affect conidial production. SEM results showed that mutants have many “open ended” phialides and poorly developed conidiophores. This would suggest that pacC activation of conidial production genes is also required. Furthermore, pacC RNAi silencing severely impaired the ability of the A. flavus mutants to infect and cause damage on maize. The results obtained here are similar to that of pacC null mutants in A. nidulans, C. albicans and F. oxysporum which also exhibited low pathogenicity (Davis et al, 2000; Fonzi, W.A, 2002; Caracuel et al, 2003; Bignell et al, 2005 and Cornet et al, 2005). This study indicates that pathogenicity of A. flavus on maize is directly related to the structural integrity of conidia, which in turn is greatly influenced by PacC. This gene is a global transcriptional regulator and may either repress or activate one or many genes in each of the above pathways (Penalva and Arst, 2002). Studies on the genetic mechanisms of pacC regulation on these pathways are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of activation or repression of these genes

Mutational analysis of the PacC binding sites within the aflR promoter in Aspergillus flavus

It is generally known that media containing simple sugars (sucrose, glucose) and organic nitrogen sources (ammonium) when buffered to acidic pH stimulates aflatoxin production in Aspergillus flavus & A. parasiticus while lactose, nitrate and an alkaline pH inhibit aflatoxin biosynthesis. It has been shown that pH of the growth medium is the most important regulatory factor for aflatoxin biosynthesis since media containing stimulatory carbon and/or nitrogen sources (sucrose and ammonia) do not enhance aflatoxin (or sterigmatocystin) production at alkaline pH. RNA interference (in A. flavus) of the pH regulatory transcription factor, PacC, resulted in aflatoxin production under acidic and alkaline pH conditions whilst wildtype Aspergillus flavus produced aflatoxins only under acidic conditions. This conclusively proved that PacC negatively regulates aflatoxin production at alkaline pH in A. flavus. However the exact mechanism involved in PacC repression of aflatoxin biosynthesis at alkaline pH still remains unknown. The AflR protein is essential for expression of several genes in the aflatoxin biosynthetic cluster. In the current study, sequence analysis of the aflR promoter indicated the presence of two putative PacC binding sites within the aflR promoter of A. flavus 3357WT located at positions -162 and -487 bp from the start codon. The presence of the PacC binding sites in the aflR promoter indicated a possible link between aflR expression and PacC regulation under alkaline conditions. Thus, in this study, it was hypothesized that at alkaline pH, PacC inhibits aflR expression by binding to one or both of the PacC binding sites within the aflR promoter. This in turn, would result in inhibition of aflatoxin biosynthesis since expression of several aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway genes is dependent on activation by AflR. The aim and objective of this study was to test the validity of this hypothesis i.e. that at alkaline pH PacC binds to one or both of its recognition sites within the aflR promoter thereby inhibiting aflR expression which subsequently would result in inhibition of aflatoxin biosynthesis. This was done by first mutating each individual and then both PacC binding sites in the A. flavus 3357 aflR promoter via Single-Joint PCR (SJ-PCR) and fusing the wildtype and each mutated aflR promoter to the Green Fluorescent Protein (gfp) gene and the trpC terminator to yield a functional expression vector. These constructs were then transformed into A. flavus 3357.5. Positive transformants were confirmed to express GFP by fluorescence microscopy and spectrofluorometry. Quantification of GFP protein levels of the various transformants in this study indicated that PacC negatively regulated aflR promoter activity at alkaline pH. RT-qPCR was performed on positive transformants after growth on SLS medium at acidic and alkaline pH to determine if PacC negatively regulated aflR promoter activity at alkaline pH and to determine whether PacC binds preferentially to one or both recognition sites within the aflR promoter. RT-qPCR analysis suggest that PacC binds non-preferentially to both recognition sites within the aflR promoter on sucrose and lactose media at alkaline pH, although mutation of PacC binding site 2 results in a slightly higher expression compared to mutation of PacC binding site 1. Increasing the concentration of an aflatoxin conducive nitrogen source stimulated aflR promoter activity but this was not sufficient to overcome negative regulation by PacC. It is generally known that repression of aflR expression results in repression of aflatoxin biosynthesis irrespective of pH. The results of this study strongly suggest that PacC negatively regulates aflR promoter activity at alkaline pH by binding to one or both PacC recognition sites within the aflR promoter. Since aflR promoter activity is repressed by PacC at alkaline pH, this substantiates the hypothesis that PacC represses aflatoxin biosynthesis by inhibiting expression of aflR. Furthermore, the results of this study indicated that there may be some PacC protein present in the active form at acidic pH irrespective of the carbon source and nitrogen source used in the growth medium. RT-qPCR analysis indicated that any active PacC present at acidic pH may cause repression of the aflR promoter based on the position of the PacC binding site relative to the aflR start codon, although it appears that PacC may have a higher affinity for PacC binding site 2 (which is closer to the aflR start codon)

Mutational analysis of the PacC binding sites within the aflR promoter in Aspergillus flavus

It is generally known that media containing simple sugars (sucrose, glucose) and organic nitrogen sources (ammonium) when buffered to acidic pH stimulates aflatoxin production in Aspergillus flavus & A. parasiticus while lactose, nitrate and an alkaline pH inhibit aflatoxin biosynthesis. It has been shown that pH of the growth medium is the most important regulatory factor for aflatoxin biosynthesis since media containing stimulatory carbon and/or nitrogen sources (sucrose and ammonia) do not enhance aflatoxin (or sterigmatocystin) production at alkaline pH. RNA interference (in A. flavus) of the pH regulatory transcription factor, PacC, resulted in aflatoxin production under acidic and alkaline pH conditions whilst wildtype Aspergillus flavus produced aflatoxins only under acidic conditions. This conclusively proved that PacC negatively regulates aflatoxin production at alkaline pH in A. flavus. However the exact mechanism involved in PacC repression of aflatoxin biosynthesis at alkaline pH still remains unknown. The AflR protein is essential for expression of several genes in the aflatoxin biosynthetic cluster. In the current study, sequence analysis of the aflR promoter indicated the presence of two putative PacC binding sites within the aflR promoter of A. flavus 3357WT located at positions -162 and -487 bp from the start codon. The presence of the PacC binding sites in the aflR promoter indicated a possible link between aflR expression and PacC regulation under alkaline conditions. Thus, in this study, it was hypothesized that at alkaline pH, PacC inhibits aflR expression by binding to one or both of the PacC binding sites within the aflR promoter. This in turn, would result in inhibition of aflatoxin biosynthesis since expression of several aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway genes is dependent on activation by AflR. The aim and objective of this study was to test the validity of this hypothesis i.e. that at alkaline pH PacC binds to one or both of its recognition sites within the aflR promoter thereby inhibiting aflR expression which subsequently would result in inhibition of aflatoxin biosynthesis. This was done by first mutating each individual and then both PacC binding sites in the A. flavus 3357 aflR promoter via Single-Joint PCR (SJ-PCR) and fusing the wildtype and each mutated aflR promoter to the Green Fluorescent Protein (gfp) gene and the trpC terminator to yield a functional expression vector. These constructs were then transformed into A. flavus 3357.5. Positive transformants were confirmed to express GFP by fluorescence microscopy and spectrofluorometry. Quantification of GFP protein levels of the various transformants in this study indicated that PacC negatively regulated aflR promoter activity at alkaline pH. RT-qPCR was performed on positive transformants after growth on SLS medium at acidic and alkaline pH to determine if PacC negatively regulated aflR promoter activity at alkaline pH and to determine whether PacC binds preferentially to one or both recognition sites within the aflR promoter. RT-qPCR analysis suggest that PacC binds non-preferentially to both recognition sites within the aflR promoter on sucrose and lactose media at alkaline pH, although mutation of PacC binding site 2 results in a slightly higher expression compared to mutation of PacC binding site 1. Increasing the concentration of an aflatoxin conducive nitrogen source stimulated aflR promoter activity but this was not sufficient to overcome negative regulation by PacC. It is generally known that repression of aflR expression results in repression of aflatoxin biosynthesis irrespective of pH. The results of this study strongly suggest that PacC negatively regulates aflR promoter activity at alkaline pH by binding to one or both PacC recognition sites within the aflR promoter. Since aflR promoter activity is repressed by PacC at alkaline pH, this substantiates the hypothesis that PacC represses aflatoxin biosynthesis by inhibiting expression of aflR. Furthermore, the results of this study indicated that there may be some PacC protein present in the active form at acidic pH irrespective of the carbon source and nitrogen source used in the growth medium. RT-qPCR analysis indicated that any active PacC present at acidic pH may cause repression of the aflR promoter based on the position of the PacC binding site relative to the aflR start codon, although it appears that PacC may have a higher affinity for PacC binding site 2 (which is closer to the aflR start codon)

Fatal disseminated toxoplasmosis in a zoological collection of meerkats (Suricata suricatta)

Two confirmed cases of fatal disseminated toxoplasmosis occurred in an urban zoological collection of meerkats (Suricata suricatta). Both cases are suspected to be the result of feral cats gaining access to the enclosure. Toxoplasmosis has rarely been documented in meerkats. Subsequent to prophylactic treatment of all the animals and structural changes being implemented within the enclosure, no new cases have been recorded to date. Very little information is available on the disease in viverrids.http://www.jsava.co.zaam2017Veterinary Tropical Disease

Sarcocystis cafferi n. sp. (Protozoa : Apicomplexa) from the African Buffalo (Syncerus caffer)

Sarcocystis infections have been reported from the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), but the species have not been named. Here we propose a new name Sarcocystis cafferi from the African buffalo. Histological examination of heart (92), skeletal muscle (36), and tongue (2) sections from 94 buffalos from the Greater Kruger National Park, South Africa, and a review of the literature revealed only 1 species of Sarcocystis in the African buffalo. Macrocysts were up to 12 mm long and 6 mm wide and were located in the neck muscles and overlying connective tissue. They were pale yellow; shaped like a lychee fruit stone or cashew nut; turgid or flaccid and oval to round (not fusiform). By light microscopy (LM) the sarcocyst wall was relatively thin. By scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the sarcocyst wall had a mesh-like structure with irregularly shaped villar protrusions (vp) that were of different sizes and folded over the sarcocyst wall. The entire surfaces of vp were covered with papillomatous structures. By transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the sarcocyst wall was up to 3.6 lm thick and had highly branched villar protrusions that were up to 3 lm long. The villar projections contained filamentous tubular structures, most of which were parallel to the long axis of the projections, but some tubules criss-crossed, especially at the base. Granules were absent from these tubules. Longitudinally cut bradyzoites were 12.132.7 lm in size, had a long convoluted mitochondrion, and only 2 rhoptries. Phylogenetic analysis of 18S rRNA and cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene sequences indicated that this Sarcocystis species is very closely related to, but distinct from, Sarcocystis fusiformis and Sarcocystis hirsuta. Thus, morphological findings by LM, SEM, and TEM together with molecular phylogenetic data (from 18S rRNA and cox1) confirm that the Sarcocystis species in the African buffalo is distinct from S. fusiformis and has therefore been named Sarcocystis cafferi.http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jrnlparasitology/hb201

Accuracy of molecular diagnostic methods for the detection of bovine brucellosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aim: Bovine brucellosis is a disease of global socio-economic importance caused by Brucella abortus. Diagnosis is mainly based on bacterial culture and serology. However, these methods often lack sensitivity and specificity. A range of molecular diagnostic methods has been developed to address these challenges. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of molecular tools, in comparison to gold standard bacterial isolation and serological assays for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Materials and Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on analyses of peer-reviewed journal articles published between January 1, 1990, and June 6, 2020, in the PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Springer Link databases. Data were extracted from studies reporting the use of molecular diagnostic methods for the detection of B. abortus infections in animals according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of included journal articles was assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic-accuracy studies assessment tool and meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager. Results: From a total of 177 studies, only 26 articles met the inclusion criteria based on PRISMA guidelines. Data from 35 complete studies were included in the meta-analysis and used to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables. Improved diagnostic performance was observed when tissue (sensitivity 92.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.0–98.0%]) and serum samples (sensitivity 91.3% [95% CI 86.0–95.0%]) were used, while the BruAb2_0168 locus was the gene of preference for optimal assay performance (sensitivity 92.3% [95% CI 87.0–96.0%] and specificity 99.3% [95% CI 98.0–100.0%]). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) had a higher diagnostic accuracy than polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR with sensitivity of 92.0% (95% CI 78.0–98.0%) and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI 97.0–100.0%). Conclusion: The findings of this study assign superior diagnostic performance in the detection of B. abortus to LAMP. However, due to limitations associated with decreased specificity and a limited number of published articles on LAMP, the alternative use of PCR-based assays including those reported in literature is recommended while the use of LAMP for the detection of bovine brucellosis gains traction and should be evaluated more comprehensively in future

Occurrence and diversity of avian haemosporidia in Afrotropical landbirds

Avian haemosporidian infections are widespread and can result in the decline of wild bird populations or in some cases contribute to extinction of species. We determined the prevalence and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidia in 93 samples from 22 landbird species from South Africa (N = 76) and West Africa (N = 17), of which six are intra-African migrants and one is a Palearctic migrant. The samples were analysed for the presence of avian haemosporidian DNA using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and nested PCR assays targeting specific mitochondrial genes of these parasites. The cytochrome b (cytb) gene was sequenced for all samples that tested positive and phylogenetic analysis was conducted in order to determine the relationship of the new sequences with previously published sequences from the MalAvi database. The overall prevalence of avian haemosporidiosis was 68.82% (95% CI: 56.4%–78.87%) and 82.80% (95% CI: 65.68%–86.11%) as determined by qPCR and nested PCR respectively. Eighteen (19.36%; 95% CI; 10.78%–29.97%) samples had mixed infections. Infection prevalence of all haemosporidian spp. were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in samples from West Africa. Forty-six mitochondrial sequences obtained from 14 avian species grouped into three distinct clusters of Haemoproteus (36), Leucocytozoon (8) and Plasmodium (2). These represent eight published and nine new cytb lineages. The most common lineage was Haemoproteus sp. (VIMWE1) which was identified in two bird species from West Africa and seven bird species from South Africa. This study adds to our knowledge of host-parasite relationships of avian haemosporidia of Afrotropical birds. Keywords: Afrotropical landbirds, cytb, Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon, qPC