Konstitusionalitas Badan Peradilan Khusus Dan MK Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pilkada Langsung

In accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results, because the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2008 NRI are against the Constitution of 1945. Article 157 paragraph (1) Law No. 8 Year 2015 determines that the dispute settlement on direct election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constitutional authority to fulfill temporary legal vacuum (rechtvakum). Therefore legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct election results

Desentralisasi Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat

Setelah dilakukan amandemen UUD 1945 telah terjadi Perubahan besar terhadap sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia, dan sistem pemerintahan yang semula sentralistik ke dalam sistem pemerintahan desentralisasi. Perubahan tersebut termasuk dalam konsepsi kewenangan pengelolaan sumber daya alam yang semula terpusat, saat ini diserahkan kepada daerah bersamaan dengan dikeluarkanya UU No. 32 Th 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Penyerahan kewenangan ini dimaksudkan untuk lebih memberikan peran aktif terhadap daerah dalam rangka mengelola sumber daya alam yang dimiliki untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat di daerah, yang selama ini dikelola langsung oleh pemerintah pusat

Hubungan antara Pajanan Pestisida dengan Kejadian Dislipidemi pada Wanita Usia Subur (WUS) di Desa Gombong Kecamatan Belik Kabupaten Pemalang

Background: One of the impact of pesticide exposure to women of childbearing age is dislipidemia. Dislipidemiaon women can cause reproductive disorder such as infertility, spontaneous abostion, fetal growth disordere andpremature birth. This research aimed is to prove that pesticide exposure is the risk factor for dislipidemi on WCA.Method: It was a cross-sectional study on 38 subjects Pesticide exposure was measured by asking WCA's involvementin agricultural activities using structured questionnaire and by checking their level of cholinesterase. Incidenceof dislipidemi measured using blood lipid profile parameters (total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides).Confounding variables included in this research were age, level of education, nutritional status, hormonalparticipation KB, cigarette smoke exposure history.Result: The prevalence of dislipidemi on WCA was 44.7%. Subjects with cholinesterase levels below the averagewere 20 people (52.6%) with a mean ± SD was 8.9395+1.37556. Pesticide exposure is a risk factor dislipidemi (p= 0.024, 95% CI = 1.167 to 6.094).Conclusion: The higher the degree of exposure to pesticides, the greater the risk of dislipidemia. Based on dataand theory study, the pathogenesis of dislipidemi allegedly through the barriers of lipase function, thyroid hormoneresistance and the accumulation of pollutants in fatty tissue

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Tersangka Dalam Batas Waktu Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Umum Menurut Hak Asasi Manusia

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kedudukan hukum tersangka dalam proses penyidikan dan perlindungan hukum tersangka dalam batas waktu penyidikan tindak pidana umum menurut hak asasi manusia. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa KUHAP telah menjabarkan ketentuan-ketentuan yang menjadi hak tersangka dan upaya perlindungan hukum bagi tersangka menurut Hak Asasi manusia. Namun kewenangan yang diberikan KUHAP terhadap penyidik memberi keleluasaan kewenangan kepada Penyidik, dengan alasan bahwa tindakan yang dilakukan tersebut merupakan tindakan keharusan dan masih selaras dengan wewenang sebagaimana diatur dalam rumusan-rumusan sebelumnya. Interprestasi kewenangan sepenuhnya ada di penyidik. Dan dalam proses penyidikan tidak terdapat ketentuan yang mengatur mengenai batas waktu maksimal penetapan status tersangka mulai dari penyidikan sampai pelimpahan perkara kepersidangan, sehingga status tersangka tergantung pada proses penyidikan. Keleluasaan kewenangan penyidik dan tidak adanya batas waktu tercermin dalam Peluang untuk terjadinya penggunaan wewenang yang berlebihan itu misalnya terlihat pada rumusan Pasal 5 ayat (1) huruf a butir 4 KUHAP yang menyatakan penyidik dapat “mengadakan tindakan lain menurut hukum yang bertanggung jawab”. Ketentuan ini menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum yang dijamin dalam Pasal 28D dan 28G Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 mengenai Hak Asasi Manusia dengan status tersangka pidana umum

Legal Protection of Particular TIME Contract Workers in Job Creation

This type of research is a normative juridical research by using laws and regulations. The Job Creation Law regulates several new provisions for certain time contract workers when compared to the previous arrangements in the Manpower Act. These new provisions are a form of legal protection for certain time contract workers.  These provisions can be summarized as follows: a longer period of time for a work agreement for a certain time, a work agreement for a certain time in written form.  This is to provide legal certainty to workers regarding the existence of a work agreement relationship between workers and employers

Limitation of Use and Abuse of the Authority of the Discretion Which Create the State Financial Losses

Discretion is the authority of government administration to face problems for which there are no regulations (eemten in het recht), and/or (vage norms) so that it requires explanation, interpretation, consideration of various related interests, and/ or because there are options that can be made in regulation. By government organs in carrying out their duties, namely discretionary authority. The limits on the use of discretionary powers must not deviate from and conflict with the rules above, in accordance with the hierarchy of laws and regulations, not violating human rights and obligations of citizens, not being used arbitrarily, still in the position of the scope of the basic regulations, used in a state of coercion/urgent for the sake of public welfare/interest, and based on the General Principles of Good Governance. Responsibility of Public Officials uses discretionary powers which results in detournement de pouvair with wederrechtelijkheid which results in losses to state finances

The Importance of Determining the Contiguous Zone Related to the Authority of Indonesian Navy

This study uses normative research, using several approaches to statutory regulations, philosophical approaches and conceptual approaches. The contiguous zone doesn't exceed 24 nautical miles from the baseline of the measured territorial sea width and the zone directly adjacent to the territorial sea of the country. This zone of the coastal state doesn't have soverenitas as well as the territorial sea and the state can excercise certain powers. However, this zonal routeis considered important as a transition between the two parts of the sea. The authority of the coastal state can carry out the necessary oversight to protect violations of customs, fiscal, immigration of sanitary regulations within the territorial sea or the territorial sea and punish violations of these laws and regulations over it's territory or territorial sea. The legal urgency of the contiguous zone regime, as stipulated in Article 33 UNCLOS 1982 states a demand for the state's needs as the basis for law enforcement to see the benefits and strategic and economic value for the state. The consequence of ratifying UNCLOS 1982 means that the state submits itself to the provisions and obligations to follow up the various provisions contained therein. Manifesting in the form of national legislation as a measure to protect various interests of the state and guidance in law enforcement