Analisis Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, Kebijakan Deviden Dan Keputusan Investasi Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan LQ45 Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2014)

Companies with business it does aim to maximize the wealth of shareholders which will be reflected in the value of the company. The company's value is the price paid by the prospective buyer if the company is sold. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of retrun on equity (ROE), the size of the company, the dividend payout ratio (DPR) and price earnings ratio (PER) of the firm value at LQ45 companies that listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population used in this study are all LQ45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling method with a purposive sampling in accordance with the specified criteria. The number of samples collected as many as 18 companies with 72 data. The collected data were analyzed using panel data analysis models using Eviews Fixed Effect 7. Based on the results in regression models in mind a few things, as follows: (1) variable retrun on equity (ROE) has positive and statistically significant to the firm value, ( 2) variable firm size negative and statistically significant to firm value (3) a variable dividend payout ratio (DPR) has positive and statistically not significant to the firm value, (4) a variable price earnings ratio (PER) has positive and statistically significantly to the firm value . Keywords: return on equity (ROE), firm size, dividend payout ratio (DPR) and price earnings ratio (PER), firm valu

PENGARUH UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, PROFITABILITAS, KEBIJAKAN DEVIDEN, DAN KEPUTUSAN INVESTASI TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN (Studi Penggunaan Indeks LQ-45 Periode 2010 -2014)

A company aimed and tried to maximize shareholder prosperity. Shareholder prosperity was reflected by company value. This study aimed to review the effect of firm size, Dividend Payout Ratio, Return on Equity, and Price Earning Ratio on firm value among ILQ45 companies registered in The Indonesia Stock Exchange. Populations of this study were firms registered in The Indonesia Stock Exchange of the year 2010 – 2014. The research used purposive sampling method based on determined criteria. There were 22 firms with totally 110 data. After the outliers process, there were 18 with totally 90 data samples. Based on these data, this study carried a classic assumption analysis using multiple regression data with SPSS16. The regression test resulted: (1) Firm size positively influenced and not significant to firm value; (2) Dividend Payout Ratio positively influenced and not significant to firm value; (3) Return on Equity positively influenced and not significant to firm value; (4) Price Earning Ratio positively influenced and not significant to corporate value

The Dynamics of Gender Differences on Tourism Governance in Indonesia

 Research on gender and tourism is very important at least because of three reasons. First, processes involved in tourism are constructed out of gender ideologies in the society. Second, gender relations contribute to the dynamics of the fluidity of gender identity in tourism. Finally, gender perspective is a tool for understanding the relationship between tourism and social process. Unfortunately, there have been limited studies on gender in tourism. This study offers empirical evidence of gender in tourism governance from Indonesia’s experience. It assesses the gender differences in tourism governance by proposing three variables, namely involvement, competence, and barriers to women and men involvement in tourism governance. The study was conducted in Karangayar regency in Indonesia, with the survey method as a data collection technique. No less than four hundred respondents were recruited in the survey, comprising of two hundred men and two hundred women. Mokken scale analysis was employed to analyze the collected data. Using the gendered perspective framework, the findings show three results. First, there is significant difference in the involvement of men and women in Indonesia’s tourism governance. Secondly, there is no significant difference between the competence of women and men in tourism governance. Lastly, it is found that there is no significant difference between the barriers of women and men in tourism governance. Therefore, while gender ideology still occurs in tourism governance, it has increasingly reduced