Quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement using the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire

Malalties aòrtiques; Pròtesi de vàlvula cardíaca; Qualitat de l'assistència sanitàriaEnfermedades aórticas; Prótesis de válvula cardíaca; Calidad de la asistencia sanitariaAortic diseases; Heart valve prosthesis; Quality of healthcareBackground The Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ) is a validated instrument for assessing quality of life (QoL) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). In this study, we evaluated health status outcomes, based on the TASQ, in patients with severe AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods The TASQ registry was a prospective observational registry. Patients with severe AS from nine centres in Europe and one in Canada underwent either SAVR or transfemoral TAVR. Patients completed the TASQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Short Form-12 V.2 prior to the intervention, predischarge, and at 30-day and 3-month follow-ups. Primary end point was the TASQ score. Results In both the TAVR (n=137) and SAVR (n=137) cohorts, significant increases were observed in all three scores. The overall TASQ score improved as did all but one of the individual domains at 3 months after the intervention (p<0.001). TASQ health expectations were the only domain which worsened (p<0.001). Across TASQ subscores, significant changes were evident from the time of discharge in the TAVR and 30-day follow-up in the SAVR cohort. In a categorical analysis of the TASQ, 39.7% of the TAVR group and 35.0% of the SAVR group had a substantially improved health status at 3 months compared with baseline. Conclusions The TASQ captured changes in QoL among patients with severe AS who were treated with TAVR or SAVR. QoL improved substantially after either intervention, as indicated by changes in the TASQ overall score at 3 months.This work was supported by a research grant provided by Edwards Lifesciences (Nyon, Switzerland) to the Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine (Cloppenburg, Germany)

SARS Control and Psychological Effects of Quarantine, Toronto, Canada

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40320/2/Hawryluck_SARS Control and Psychological Effects_2004.pd

Cannabis Use: A New Risk Behaviour Among Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Background: Cannabis use has increased in Canada and can be associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Given increased use and accessibility to cannabis, there is a need among clinicians to better understand cannabis use in adults with congenital heart disease. Methods: A cross-sectional survey (May to September 2018) was used to investigate cannabis use among 252 patients with adult congenital heart disease in a quaternary care centre. Results: Of the 252 patients, 53 (21%) reported using cannabis. The majority of cannabis users were men (62%), between the ages of 25 and 39 years (mean age = 32 ± 16 years), and more likely to use tobacco (n = 9, 17%; P = 0.001) and alcohol (n = 37, 60%; P = 0.001). Significant differences (P = 0.011) were found between the age of onset for tobacco use among cannabis users (mean age: 16 ± 8 years) and non-cannabis users (mean age: 20 ± 3 years). Users reported consuming cannabis for recreational purposes (n = 29, 55%), anxiety (n = 22, 42%), depression (n = 15, 28%), and pain management (n = 4, 8%). Conclusions: This study supports our clinical experience that a high proportion of patients with adult congenital heart disease use cannabis. Cannabis users represent a patient population who may demonstrate less optimal health behaviours, including tobacco and alcohol use. Assessment of cannabis use should be an integral part of risk behaviour and cardiovascular risk profile at each clinic visit. Given the current legalization of cannabis in Canada and the growing increase of cannabis use, educational support should be provided to patients and caregivers. Résumé: Contexte: La consommation de cannabis, en hausse au Canada, a été associée à des manifestations cardiovasculaires indésirables. Puisque l’usage et la disponibilité du cannabis ont augmenté, il est nécessaire pour les cliniciens de mieux comprendre cet usage chez les adultes qui présentent une cardiopathie congénitale. Méthodologie: Nous avons mené une enquête transversale (mai à septembre 2018) sur l’usage du cannabis auprès de 252 adultes atteints d’une cardiopathie congénitale dans un centre de soins quaternaires. Résultats: Cinquante-trois patients sur 252 (21 %) ont indiqué consommer du cannabis. Les utilisateurs de cannabis étaient en majorité des hommes (62 %), ils étaient âgés de 25 à 39 ans (âge moyen de 32 ans ± 16), et ils étaient plus susceptibles de consommer du tabac (n = 9; 17 %; p = 0,001) et de l’alcool (n = 37; 60 %; p = 0,001). Une différence significative a été notée entre l’âge au moment de commencer l’usage de tabac chez les utilisateurs de cannabis (âge moyen de 16 ± 8 ans) et chez les non-utilisateurs (âge moyen de 20 ± 3 ans). Les personnes consommaient du cannabis pour un usage récréatif (n = 29; 55 %), ou pour la prise en charge de l’anxiété (n = 22; 42 %), de la dépression (n = 15; 28 %) ou de la douleur (n = 4; 8 %). Conclusion: Notre étude corrobore notre expérience clinique, selon laquelle une proportion importante des adultes atteints d’une cardiopathie congénitale consomment du cannabis. Les patients qui font usage de cannabis constituent une population qui pourrait adopter des comportements moins favorables pour la santé, comme la consommation d’alcool et de produits de tabac. Une évaluation de l’usage de cannabis devrait faire partie intégrante du profil de comportements à risque et du risque cardiovasculaire réalisé à chacune des visites des patients. Étant donné la légalisation du cannabis au Canada et l’augmentation constante de son usage, un soutien éducatif devrait être offert aux patients et à leurs proches

Quality of Life Measures in Aortic Stenosis Research: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND Elderly patients with aortic stenosis (AS) not only have a reduced life expectancy but also a reduced quality of life (QoL). The benefits of an AS intervention may be considered a balance between a good QoL and a reasonably extended life. However, the different questionnaires being used to determine the QoL were generally not developed for the specific situation of patients with AS and come with strengths and considerable weaknesses. The objective of this article was to provide an overview of the available QoL instruments in AS research, describe their strengths and weaknesses, and provide our assessment of the utility of the available scoring instruments for QoL measurements in AS. SUMMARY We identified and reviewed the following instruments that are used in AS research: Short Form Health Survey (SF-36/SF-12), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), the Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale (IIRS), the HeartQoL, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF), the MacNew Questionnaire, and the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ). KEY MESSAGES There is no standardized assessment of QoL in patients with AS. Many different questionnaires are being used, but they are rarely specific for AS. There is a need for AS-specific research into the QoL of patients as life prolongation may compete for an improved QoL in this elderly patient group

Trial protocol for the validation of the 'Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life (TASQ) Questionnaire' in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): the TASQ registry

Background Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) have a reduced life expectancy and quality of life (QoL), owing to advanced age and the presence of multiple comorbidities. Currently, there is no AS-specific QoL measurement tool, which prevents an accurate assessment of how this chronic condition and its treatment affect patients. The Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ) was developed in order to address this deficiency.Methods The present trial protocol was designed to enable validation of the TASQ, which has been produced in five languages (English, French, German, Italian and Spanish) to increase usability. Patients with severe AS who are undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) will be asked to complete the TASQ and, for comparative purposes, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and the general health-related QoL Short Form-12 questionnaire. The questionnaires will be completed prior to the intervention, at discharge, as well as at 30 days and 3 months follow-up. A total of 290 patients will be recruited across one Canadian and nine European centres. Overall, the protocol validation aims to include 120 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI (TF-TAVI), 120 undergoing SAVR and up to 50 being treated medically. The primary objective of the registry is to validate the TASQ in five different languages. The secondary objective is to assess the utility of the TASQ for assessing differences in QoL outcome between patients undergoing TF-TAVI, SAVR or medical management for their AS.Discussion Validation and roll-out of the TASQ will enable clinicians to capture an accurate assessment of how AS and its management affects the QoL of patients and will help them to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for individual patients