A Completely Endovascular Solution for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Embolisation and Inversion into the Aortic Arch

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved into the preferred alternative to surgical valve replacement for severe aortic valve stenosis with high surgical risk. With expanding indications, life threatening complications including transcatheter aortic valve embolisation and inversion (TAVEI), in which the valve dislodges, inverts, and migrates caudally, may increase concomitantly. Report: An 80 year old male with severe aortic valve stenosis underwent balloon expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Valve embolisation into the aortic arch inverted the bioprothesis, excluding the option of fixation in the descending aorta. Through-valve thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed after bifemoral snaring using a through-and-through wire technique and pulling the valve into the descending aorta. Discussion: TAVI is emerging as the preferred treatment for severe aortic valve stenosis and comes with unique procedural complications, such as life threatening transcatheter aortic valve embolisation and inversion (TAVEI). Although some authors prefer treating embolisation of a non-inverted balloon expandable valve into the aorta by using the valvuloplasty balloon to pull the valve distally and fixing it in the descending aorta, this risks further expansion of the valve and consequently fixing it in an undesirable position and is not possible if the valve inverts. Downstream placement of the valve by snaring with a guiding catheter covering/protecting a through-and-through wire technique, combined with through-valve TEVAR, provides a new bail out strategy for this serious complication and may reduce TAVEI associated mortality and morbidity

Stressful life events are associated with low secretion rates of immunoglobulin A in saliva in the middle aged and elderly

Whether chronic stress experience is related to down-regulation of secretory immunoglobulin A (S-IgA) was tested in two substantial cohorts, one middle-aged (N = 640) and one elderly (N = 582), comprising similar numbers of men (N = 556) and women (N = 666) and manual (N = 606) and non-manual (N = 602) workers. Participants indicated from a list of major stressful life events up to six they had experienced in the previous two years. They also rated how disruptive and stressful the events were, at the time and now, as well as their perceived seriousness; the products of these impact values and event frequency were adopted as measures of stress load. From unstimulated 2-minute saliva samples, saliva volume and S-IgA concentration were measured, and S-IgA secretion rate determined as their product. There was a negative association between the stress load measures and S-IgA secretion rate, still evident following adjustment for such variables as smoking and saliva volume. The associations also withstood adjustment for sex, cohort, and household occupational status. Although these associations are small in terms of the amount of variance explained, they nonetheless suggest that chronic stress experience either decreases IgA production by the local plasma cells or reduces the efficiency with which S-IgA is transported from the glandular interstitium into saliva. Given the importance of S-IgA in immune defence at mucosal surfaces and the frequency with which infections are initiated at these surfaces, S-IgA down-regulation could be a means by which chronic stress increases susceptibility to upper respiratory tract infection

Safety of second-generation drug-eluting stents three years after randomised use in the TWENTE trial

Aims: To assess three-year clinical outcome following randomised use of the second-generation Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES). For Resolute ZES and randomised use, outcome data ≥3 years are relatively scarce. Methods and results: The TWENTE trial examined 1,391 patients with stable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, of whom 21.6% were diabetics, 70.1% had complex B2 or C lesions and 77.4% had “off-label” indications for DES use. Three-year follow-up data were obtained in 1,381 patients (99.3%; 10 withdrawals). Adverse clinical events were independently adjudicated. The primary endpoint target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target vessel revascularisation, was 12.1% for Resolute ZES and 13.4% for XIENCE V EES (p=0.50). Cardiac death rates were 1.9% vs. 3.5% (p=0.06); the other individual components of TVF also showed no significant between-group differences. The rates of definite-or-probable stent thrombosis (1.4% vs. 1.6%, p=0.82) and very late stent thrombosis (0.6% vs. 0.4%, p=1.0) did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Three-year follow-up data of patients included in the randomised TWENTE trial demonstrated similar and sustained safety and efficacy of Resolute ZES and XIENCE V EE

Patient preference regarding assessment of clinical follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention: the PAPAYA study

Aims: To keep patients in long-term clinical follow-up programmes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), knowledge of the patient-preferred mode for follow-up assessment is crucial. We systematically assessed patient preference, and explored potential relationships with age and gender.Methods and results: In the prospective, observational PAPAYA study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02189070), 2,566 patients, treated by PCI between June 2008 and May 2012, were invited to participate in a postal survey on the patient-preferred mode (postal questionnaire, telephone or e-mail consultation) and frequency of follow-up assessment. A total of 1,797 (70.0%) patients responded. The vast majority preferred completing postal questionnaires (1,248 [69.9%]) as compared to telephone (240 [13.4%]) or e-mail-based approaches (227 [12.7%]) (p<0.001). With increasing age, there was a gradual decline in preference for e-mail (p<0.001); the youngest patients (≤60 years) preferred e-mail-based follow-up more often than the oldest (21.1% vs. 3.1%). Nevertheless, 79.9% of the youngest preferred to be approached in ways other than by e-mail. Women more often preferred approaches other than e-mail (94.1% vs. 87.3%, p<0.001).Conclusions: Patients showed a distinct preference for completing postal questionnaires rather than being approached by telephone or e-mail. Younger patients accepted e-mail-based follow-up more often, but the majority of the youngest patients still preferred approaches other than by e-mail - See more at: http://www.pcronline.com/eurointervention/ahead-of-print/201510-06/patient-preference-regarding-assessment-of-clinical-follow-up-after-percutaneous-coronary-intervention-the-papaya-study

TCT-251 Abnormal glucose metabolism and adverse event rates 12 months after treatment with contemporary drug-eluting stents:Insights from the BIO-RESORT Silent Diabetes study

BACKGROUND: Patients with abnormal glucose metabolism, including patients with undetected and thus untreated diabetes, may have higher event risks after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES). We assessed the prevalence and clinical impact of abnormal glucose metabolism in allcomer patients without previously known diabetes undergoing PCI. METHODS: The BIO-RESORT Silent Diabetes study, performed at Thoraxcentrum Twente, is a substudy of the randomized BIO-RESORT trial (NCT01674803). We performed an additional analysis identifying patients with an abnormal glucose metabolism by means of oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT), and assessment of glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and clinical outcome at 12 months. RESULTS: Assessment of glucose metabolism revealed that of the 988 participants a total 330 (33.4%) patients had an abnormal metabolism, while 658 (66.6%) patients had a normal metabolism. Patients with abnormal glucose metabolism showed higher rates of the primary endpoint Target Vessel Failure (6.4% vs. 2.7%; p0.01), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that an abnormal glucose metabolism independently predicted adverse event risk (HR 2.2, 95%-CI:1.2-4.2). CONCLUSION: Abnormal glucose metabolism was detected in one out of three PCI all-comer patients and independently associated with a more than 2-fold higher event risk. Future intervention studies should determine whether meaningful benefits may accrue from routine glycaemia testing in such patients

TCT-819 Prediabetes and its Impact on 1-Year Clinical Outcome After Treatment with Newer-Generation Drug-eluting Stents in 2,986 All-Comer Patients

BACKGROUND Prediabetes (Pre-DM) is a risk factor state for developing diabetes mellitus (DM). Yet it is unclear whether detection of Pre-DM by routine assessment of glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may help identify subjects with increased event risk. We assessed in all-comers who underwent PCI with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) the relation between glycaemia status and 1-year clinical outcome. METHODS HbA1c and FPG was determined in 2,362 non-DM participants in the multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated TWENTE III trial, in order to identify Pre-DM (HbA1c 42-47mmol/mol; FPG 6.1- 6.9 mmol/L) and DM (HbA1c>=48mmol/mol; FPG >7 mmol/L). Another 624 patients had medically treated DM. The main clinical outcome parameter was a composite endpoint consisting of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularisation. RESULTS Glycaemic state was known in 2,986 trial participants: Pre- DM was present in 324 (11%), DM in 793 (27%), and normoglycaemia in 1,869 (63%) patients. Patients with Pre-DM and DM differed from normoglycemic patients in cardiovascular risk factors. The composite clinical endpoint in Pre-DM occurred in 11.1%, in DM in 10.5%, and in normoglycemic patients in 5.7% (

A Randomized Controlled Trial in Second-Generation Zotarolimus-Eluting Resolute Stents Versus Everolimus-Eluting Xience V Stents in Real-World Patients : The TWENTE Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) (Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, California) with Xience V everolimus-eluting stents (EES) (Abbott Vascular Devices, Santa Clara, California) at 1-year follow-up.BackgroundOnly 1 randomized trial previously compared these stents.MethodsThis investigator-initiated, patient-blinded, randomized noninferiority study had limited exclusion criteria (acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions not eligible). Patients (n = 1,391; 81.4% of eligible population) were randomly assigned to ZES (n = 697) or EES (n = 694). Liberal use of stent post-dilation was encouraged. Cardiac biomarkers were systematically assessed. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to non-target vessels, and clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization. An external independent research organization performed clinical event adjudication (100% follow-up data available). Analysis was by intention-to-treat.ResultsAcute coronary syndromes were present in 52% and “off-label” feature in 77% of patients. Of the lesions, 70% were type B2/C; the post-dilation rate was very high (82%). In ZES and EES, TVF occurred in 8.2% and 8.1%, respectively (absolute risk-difference 0.1%; 95% confidence interval: −2.8% to 3.0%, pnoninferiority = 0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in TVF components. The definite-or-probable stent thrombosis rates were relatively low and similar for ZES and EES (0.9% and 1.2%, respectively, p = 0.59). Definite stent thrombosis rates were also low (0.58% and 0%, respectively, p = 0.12). In EES, probable stent thrombosis beyond day 8 was observed only in patients not adhering to dual antiplatelet therapy.ConclusionsResolute ZES were noninferior to Xience V EES in treating “real-world” patients with a vast majority of complex lesions and “off-label” indications for drug-eluting stents, which were implanted with liberal use of post-dilation. (The Real-World Endeavor Resolute Versus XIENCE V Drug-Eluting SteNt Study: Head-to-head Comparison of Clinical Outcome After Implantation of Second Generation Drug-eluting Stents in a Real World Scenario; NCT01066650