Metabolic improvements following Roux-en-Y surgery assessed by solid meal test in subjects with short duration type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Glucose homeostasis improves within days following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. The dynamic metabolic response to caloric intake following RYGB has been assessed using liquid mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT). Few studies have evaluated the glycemic and hormonal response to a solid mixed meal in subjects with diabetes prior to, and within the first month following RYGB. METHODS: Seventeen women with type 2 diabetes of less than 5 years duration participated. Fasting measures of glucose homeostasis, lipids and gut hormones were obtained pre- and post-surgery. MMTT utilizing a solid 4 oz chocolate pudding performed pre-, 2 and 4 weeks post-surgery. Metabolic response to 4 and 2 oz MMTT assessed in five diabetic subjects not undergoing surgery. RESULTS: Significant reductions in fasting glucose and insulin at 3 days, and in fasting betatrophin, triglycerides and total cholesterol at 2 weeks post-surgery. Hepatic insulin clearance was greater at 3 days post-surgery. Subjects exhibited less hunger and greater feelings of fullness and satisfaction during the MMTT while consuming 52.9 ± 6.5% and 51.0 ± 6.5% of the meal at 2 and 4 weeks post-surgery respectively. At 2 weeks post-surgery, glucose and insulin response to MMTT were improved, with greater GLP-1 and PYY secretion. Improved response to solid MMTT not replicated by consumption of smaller pudding volume in diabetic non-surgical subjects. CONCLUSIONS: With a test meal of size and composition representative of the routine diet of post-RYGB subjects, improved glycemic and gut hormone responses occur which cannot be replicated by reducing the size of the MMTT in diabetic subjects not undergoing surgery

Pooled analysis of routine safety parameters observed in healthy participants at baseline and following placebo administration in early phase clinical studies

Abstract Phase I trials inform on the initial safety profile of a new molecule and impact whether further development is pursued or not. Understanding the effect of non‐pharmacological factors on the variability of routine safety parameters could improve decision making in these early clinical trials, helping to separate signals related to the new molecule from background “noise.” To understand the impact of non‐pharmacological factors on routine safety parameters, we evaluated pooled safety data from over 1000 healthy participants treated with placebo in phase I trials between 2009 and 2018. The phase I participants were predominantly men, less than or equal to 50 years, White, and non‐Hispanic; and approximately an equal proportion had body mass index in the normal and overweight/obese range. Following administration of placebo, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and laboratory parameters remained near predose baseline values. Large changes from baseline were observed for many safety parameters, but these occurred in a relatively small number of participants. At least one adverse event (AE) occurred in 49.7% of participants receiving placebo in single ascending dose (SAD) studies and in 72.4% of participants receiving placebo in multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies, with headache being the most commonly reported AE (18.7% in SAD and 28.3% in MAD studies). Overall, these analyses are consistent with non‐pharmacological factors having a small impact on routine safety parameters in a phase I trial. The provided supplemental data may be used to contextualize the magnitude and frequency of abnormal safety values and AEs observed in phase I trials

'In-house' data on the outside : a mobile health approach

Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have the potential to capture dense patient data on the background of real-life behavior. Merck & Co., Inc. (Kenilworth, NJ), in collaboration with Koneksa Health, conducted a phase I clinical trial to validate cardiovascular mHealth technologies for concordance with traditional approaches and to establish sensitivity to detect effects of pharmacological intervention. This two-part study enrolled 18 healthy male subjects. Part I, a 5-day study, compared mHealth measures of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) to those from traditional methods. Hypotheses of similarity, in the clinic and at home, were tested individually for HR, systolic BP, and diastolic BP, at a 2-sided 0.05 alpha level, with a prespecified criterion for similarity being the percentage differences between the 2 measurements within 15%. Part II, a 7-day, 3-period randomized balanced crossover study, evaluated the mHealth technology's ability to detect effects of bisoprolol and salbutamol. Hypotheses that the changes from baseline in HR were greater in the bisoprolol (reduction in HR) and salbutamol (increase in HR) groups compared with no treatment were tested, at a 1-sided 0.05 alpha level. Linear mixed-effects models, Pearson's correlation coefficients, summary statistics, and exploratory plots were applied to analyze the data. The mHealth measures of HR and BP were demonstrated to be similar to those from traditional methods, and sensitive to changes in cardiovascular parameters induced by bisoprolol and salbutamol

Assessment of pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability following twice-daily administration of molnupiravir for 10 days in healthy participants

Molnupiravir is an orally administered, small-molecule ribonucleoside prodrug of beta-D-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) that has demonstrated potent, broad-spectrum preclinical activity against RNA viruses and has a high barrier to the development of resistance. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I trial was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and tolerability of 10.5-day administration of multiple doses of molnupiravir and its metabolites in healthy, adult participants. Participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive molnupiravir (400 mg [n = 6], 600 mg [n = 6], and 800 mg [n = 12]) or matching placebo (n = 8) every 12 h (q12h) for 10.5 days. Blood was collected to evaluate the PKs of NHC in plasma and of its active metabolite, NHC-triphosphate (NHC-TP), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Molnupiravir was generally well-tolerated. All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and none led to treatment discontinuation. No clinically meaningful dose-related safety findings were observed. Mean time to maximal concentration was similar to 1.50 to 1.98 h for plasma NHC and similar to 4.00 to 8.06 h for PBMC NHC-TP. Accumulation was minimal (<1.2) for NHC and similar to 2-to 2.5-fold for NHC-TP. Plasma NHC PKs was generally dose proportional, and PBMC NHC-TP PKs was less than dose proportional over the dose range studied. NHC and NHC-TP PK support twice-daily administration. Overall, molnupiravir administered at up to 800 mg q12h for 10.5 days was generally well-tolerated in healthy participants with dose-linear PKs, supporting the evaluation of longer molnupiravir dosing up to 10 days in future clinical trials

Safety and pharmacokinetics of islatravir subdermal implant for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis : a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial

A subdermal implant of the HIV-1 antiretroviral islatravir delivers sustained drug release over 12 weeks in humans. Islatravir (MK-8591) is a highly potent type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor with a long intracellular half-life that is in development for the prevention and treatment of HIV-1. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial in adults without HIV-1 infection. Participants received islatravir or placebo subdermal implants for 12 weeks and were monitored throughout this period and after implant removal. The co-primary end points were safety and tolerability of the islatravir implant and pharmacokinetics, including concentration at day 85, of islatravir triphosphate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Secondary end points included additional pharmacokinetic parameters for islatravir triphosphate in PBMCs and the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of islatravir. Based on preclinical data, two doses were assessed: 54 mg (n = 8, two placebo) and 62 mg (n = 8, two placebo). The most frequently reported adverse events were mild-to-moderate implant-site reactions (induration, hematoma, pain). Throughout the 12-week trial, geometric mean islatravir triphosphate concentrations were above a pharmacokinetic threshold of 0.05 pmol per 10(6) PBMCs, which was estimated to provide therapeutic reverse transcriptase inhibition (concentration at day 85 (percentage of geometric coefficient of variation): 54 mg, 0.135 pmol per 10(6) cells (27.3); 62 mg, 0.272 pmol per 10(6) cells (45.2)). Islatravir implants at both doses were safe and resulted in mean concentrations above the pharmacokinetic threshold through 12 weeks, warranting further investigation of islatravir implants as a potential HIV prevention strategy