5 research outputs found
Smarter in the city? Lizards from urban and semi-natural habitats do not differ in a cognitive task in two syntopic species.
Urbanization occurs at a global scale, imposing dramatic and abrupt environmental changes that lead to biodiversity loss. Yet, some animal species can handle these changes, and thrive in such artificial environments. One possible explanation is that urban individuals are equipped with better cognitive abilities, but most studies have focused on birds and mammals and yielded varied results. Reptiles have received much less attention, despite some lizard species being common city dwellers. The Italian wall lizard, Podarcis siculus, and the common wall lizard, Podarcis muralis, are two successful lizards in anthropogenic habitats that thrive in urban locations. To test for differences in a cognitive skill between urban and semi-natural environments, we investigated inhibitory control through a detour task in syntopic populations of the two species, across 249 lizards that were tested in partially artificial field settings. Sophisticated inhibitory control is considered essential for higher degrees of cognitive flexibility and other higher-level cognitive abilities. In this task, we confronted lizards with a transparent barrier, separating them from a desired shelter area that they could only reach by controlling their impulse to go straight and instead detour the barrier. We found no differences between lizards in urban and semi-natural environments, nor between species, but females overall performed better than males. Moreover, 48% of the lizards in our study did not perform a correct trial in any of the 5 trials, hinting at the difficulty of the task for these species. This study is among the first to address lizard cognition, through their inhibitory control, as a potential explanation for success in cities and highlights one should be careful with assuming that urban animals generally have enhanced cognitive performance, as it might be taxa, task, or condition dependent
Smarter lizards in the city?
We performed a detour task in the field to two syntopic lizard species, to test for cognitive differences between urban and semi-natural population
Smarter in the city? Lizards from urban and semi-natural habitats do not differ in a cognitive task in two syntopic species
Damas Moreira I, Szabo B, Drosopoulos G, Stober C, Lisicic D, Caspers B. Smarter in the city? Lizards from urban and semi-natural habitats do not differ in a cognitive task in two syntopic species. Current Zoology. 2024: zoae010.Urbanization occurs at a global scale, imposing dramatic and abrupt environmental changes that lead to biodiversity loss. Yet, some animal species can handle these changes, and thrive in such artificial environments. One possible explanation is that urban individuals are equipped with better cognitive abilities, but most studies have focused on birds and mammals and yielded varied results. Reptiles have received much less attention, despite some lizard species being common city dwellers. The Italian wall lizard, Podarcis siculus, and the common wall lizard, Podarcis muralis, are two successful lizards in anthropogenic habitats that thrive in urban locations. To test for differences in a cognitive skill between urban and semi-natural environments, we investigated inhibitory control through a detour task in syntopic populations of the two species, across 249 lizards that were tested in partially artificial field settings. Sophisticated inhibitory control is considered essential for higher degrees of cognitive flexibility and other higher-level cognitive abilities. In this task, we confronted lizards with a transparent barrier, separating them from a desired shelter area that they could only reach by controlling their impulse to go straight and instead detour the barrier. We found no differences between lizards in urban and semi-natural environments, nor between species, but females overall performed better than males. Moreover, 48% of the lizards in our study did not perform a correct trial in any of the 5 trials, hinting at the difficulty of the task for these species. This study is among the first to address lizard cognition, through their inhibitory control, as a potential explanation for success in cities and highlights one should be careful with assuming that urban animals generally have enhanced cognitive performance, as it might be taxa, task, or condition dependent
GEO.Cool : Kühlung mit oberflächennaher Geothermie - Möglichkeiten, Grenzen, Innovation -
Das Verbundprojekt GEO.Cool von Partnern im Landesforschungszentrum Geothermie (LFZG) hat zum Ziel, Möglichkeiten sowie Grenzen der Kühlung mit oberflächennaher Geothermie in interdisziplinärer Arbeit zu erheben und daraus Impulse für Innovationen in diesem Bereich zu gewinnen.
Das Vorhaben ist in die folgenden sechs Arbeitspakete (AP) gegliedert:
AP 1: Bedarfe und Systemaspekte
AP 2: Systemtechnik und Planung von Anlagen zur Kühlung mit oberflächennaher Ge-othermie
AP 3: Analyse von Best-Practice-Beispielen
AP 4: Thermisches und hydrogeologisches Verhalten des Untergrunds
AP 5: Genehmigungspraxis und Grenzwerte
AP 6: Synopse, Innovationspotenzial und Transfer.
Das Projekt hat eine Laufzeit vom 23.01.2017 bis zum 30.09.2019 (Förderzeitraum für alle Arbeitspakete und Projektpartner)
GEO.Cool : Kühlung mit oberflächennaher Geothermie - Möglichkeiten, Grenzen, Innovation -
In dem durchgeführten Verbundvorhaben arbeiteten zum einen die Fachgebiete Geologie/Geothermie sowie Anlagen- und Systemtechnik von geothermischer Kältegewinnung und Kältenutzung der Projektpartner interdisziplinär zusammen, um den aktuellen Wissensstand der Kühlung mittels oberflächennaher Geothermie fachübergreifend zu erfassen, zu bewerten und Schnittstellenprobleme zu bearbeiten. Aus dieser interdisziplinären Betrachtungsweise wurden ganzheitliche Hinweise zur Optimierung des geothermischen Kühlpotenzials sowie Anstöße für technische und planerische Innovationen für die Praxis entwickelt und in diese transferiert.
Zu folgenden Zielen wurden Beiträge erarbeitet:
- Steigerung der Energieeffizienz der Kühlung und Kältebereitstellung
- Nutzung regenerativer Energien zur Kühlung und Kältebereitstellung
- Begrenzung der thermischen Belastung des Untergrunds und des Grundwassers
- Minimierung der Schäden und Risiken durch den Eingriff in den Untergrun